LocationRemot3 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Badger said: Probably going against today’s tide of thought here but I thought Dan Neil would have been a good addition and business (especially if we sell Charles for upwards of £25m). From what I’d read and his promotion experience I can’t join the “well he wasn’t good enough …” , “we didn’t really want him…” pile on. That’s not to say we can’t do better, although it will cost more. The Mulligan of Hibs rumour might now resurface, although we don’t seem to have been active recruiting in Scotland for years. Or perhaps Spors/Tonda will know a Bundesliga 2 gem to come in. You could argue he's got a similar profile to Joe Rothwell who I remember contributed nothing apart from a wonder goal whilst he was here. We have better midfielders already than Neil. Downes, Jander and Charles (the latter likely going) would all start ahead of him. 1
revolution saint Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Badger said: Another MF mentioned on the thread is the 6’4” Norwegian Dahl. Young, and built like a proverbial brick shithouse, which seems a good start for a DM. It's only YouTube and I don't think he's playing at a particularly high level but thought the lad looked pretty good in the videos I saw.
Willo of Whiteley Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Scandinavia has tons of good players that could do a job. We’re probably a very attractive proposition. 1
SuperSAINT Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Badger said: Another MF mentioned on the thread is the 6’4” Norwegian Dahl. Young, and built like a proverbial brick shithouse, which seems a good start for a DM. Where did the link for this one come from?
Badger Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Just now, SuperSAINT said: Where did the link for this one come from? Further up the thread in last couple of days. Probably not a reliable source though. 1
ally_uk Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Badger said: If we’re spending serious Charles/Fernandes dosh on it then someone mentioned the Millwall strikers (Ivanovic ? and Coburn) on here previously, worth considering. Of the four you mention Tolaj apparently has something about him, Futkeu seems to match some of our tickboxes ( Bundesliga 2, affordable etc).Lankshear - did he really show anything at Oxford last year ? Lankshear scored 12 on loan for Oxford, could be worth a punt if we can get him on loan. Noel Futkeu 6.0, 22 years old, 18 goals in Bundesliga 2. Salech 6.5 24 years old, 15 goals Andrea Adorante 26 years old, 6 foot, good at holding ball up. 17 goals, Venezia. Kaliman and Hornby are two other options in the Bundesliga 2 who have the classic target man attributes and scored >10 goals last season. We got to be looking at a few of these.... Fukeku or Salech for me would be superb signings for a Ross Stewart replacement
Badger Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 7 minutes ago, ally_uk said: Lankshear scored 12 on loan for Oxford, could be worth a punt if we can get him on loan. Noel Futkeu 6.0, 22 years old, 18 goals in Bundesliga 2. Salech 6.5 24 years old, 15 goals Andrea Adorante 26 years old, 6 foot, good at holding ball up. 17 goals, Venezia. Kaliman and Hornby are two other options in the Bundesliga 2 who have the classic target man attributes and scored >10 goals last season. We got to be looking at a few of these.... Fukeku or Salech for me would be superb signings for a Ross Stewart replacement Thanks. Interesting as 12 goals for a struggling Oxford last season isn’t a bad return. My only first hand memory of him is slicing a good chance wide at St Mary’s (but then look at Kane the other night). Trouble with Lankshear is that he’ll probably be a last minute loan after De Zerbi has sorted his squad. Hornby has signed for Wolfsburg this summer. He’s good for ‘derailing’ transfer threads though. 1
JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said: I suspect that was never the case Right.
Saint86 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Willo of Whiteley said: Dom Ballard was sold for a reason. He was deemed not good enough. Frankly if we want to be pushing for the Premier League we need proven experience and someone that has the potential to do it. DB with his injury record and one season in League One doesn’t warrant that. He was sold by Spors/Still prior to Eckert taking the reigns, to be replaced by Downs and considered a worse prospect than Archer for the team. Both terrible calls. We won't always play 1 big man up top, and equally there are numerous times where Eckert changed it up to go 2 Strikers or to introduce pace. Dom Ballard should still be on the books, he's a very promising and young home grown player who was top scorer in the league below whilst playing for an awful (and nearly relegated) side. He'd be very cheap and competent depth for the first team squad, would almost certainly be a money spinner for SR, and to be frank, should never have been let go in the first place compared to the money spent (wages/transfer/agent fees) for Downs and Archer. Edited 11 hours ago by Saint86 6
Saint NL Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Spurs now spending £100m on Tonali. They are throwing some serious money around
skintsaint Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Saint NL said: Spurs now spending £100m on Tonali. They are throwing some serious money around Yet Villa who made Europe again this season have to sell to buy I think 😅 1 1
Saint NL Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago https://fixvx.com/jburttelegraph/status/2072337397489016955?s=46 Glasner to Forest Weird move. Thought he'd go to a big club, not a sideways move 1 1
bugenhagen Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 34 minutes ago, skintsaint said: Yet Villa who made Europe again this season have to sell to buy I think 😅 Just shows how poorly, or perfectly, designed these rules are
Badger Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Saint NL said: https://fixvx.com/jburttelegraph/status/2072337397489016955?s=46 Glasner to Forest Weird move. Thought he'd go to a big club, not a sideways move I’d say Forest have more potential than Palace so don’t see it as a sideways move (I’ll avoid the ‘bigger’ club debate so not to awaken MLG). But the Forst owner is probably more volatile to work for so good luck with that! Like you I thought he’d go somewhere else but a lot of the ‘bigger’ and more prestigious jobs he was linked to ( Chelsea, Man Utd, AC Milan) have gone elsewhere. 1
Disco Stu Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) Wrong thread. Edited 8 hours ago by Disco Stu
Ted Bates Statue Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, Saint NL said: https://fixvx.com/jburttelegraph/status/2072337397489016955?s=46 Glasner to Forest Weird move. Thought he'd go to a big club, not a sideways move Must have a holiday booked for November already 1 2
Willo of Whiteley Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, Saint NL said: https://fixvx.com/jburttelegraph/status/2072337397489016955?s=46 Glasner to Forest Weird move. Thought he'd go to a big club, not a sideways move Basket case of an ownership at Forest 2
Fabrice29 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, Saint86 said: He was sold by Spors/Still prior to Eckert taking the reigns, to be replaced by Downs and considered a worse prospect than Archer for the team. Both terrible calls. We won't always play 1 big man up top, and equally there are numerous times where Eckert changed it up to go 2 Strikers or to introduce pace. Dom Ballard should still be on the books, he's a very promising and young home grown player who was top scorer in the league below whilst playing for an awful (and nearly relegated) side. He'd be very cheap and competent depth for the first team squad, would almost certainly be a money spinner for SR, and to be frank, should never have been let go in the first place compared to the money spent (wages/transfer/agent fees) for Downs and Archer. I think you have wildy mis judged the context of his situation when we sold him. Saints had to judge if a lad who was still growing, a little behind his development because of his injuries and had underwhelmed in the lower league loans he had, was able to justify the playing time he needed to progress ahead of a player who had scored goals in the PL and a lad who had scored some goals in the German 2nd division and had broken into the USA set up (albeit due to rotation and injuries). All well and good you judging them on hindsight and all well and good you just not realising that his top scorer season in the lower league doesn't happen without the move and doesn't immediately translate into being able to push us to promotion either but it's not the reality Saints or Ballard faced last summer. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now