Summer Transfer Window 2026

[Matthew Le God]

15 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

I'd say we're weaker down the spine GK(backup assuming ramsdale still leaves), CB(starter), CM (rotational starter), CF (rotational starter)

Everywhere else i'd say we're level, though given the investment the hope would be Dobbin would be an improvement over archer.

The spine is stronger than it was for the first half of last season when we dropped lot of points and pretty similar in strength to the second half of last season when we did extremely well.

[Baird of the land]

9 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

The spine is stronger than it was for the first half of last season when we dropped lot of points and pretty similar in strength to the second half of last season when we did extremely well.

I don't think a comparison vs the bad 1st half season is particularly useful. Against post January we are definitely weaker all down the spine. The only debate is over the degree of weakness.

[West end Saints]

2 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

I don't think a comparison vs the bad 1st half season is particularly useful. Against post January we are definitely weaker all down the spine. The only debate is over the degree of weakness.

It's not definitely weaker, I accept your view but the counter argument is that Larin scored,I think 8 goals last season and was unfit and not sharp, he has 5 already. I would not be surprised if mubama  contributed more over a season than Stewart.

We didn't have any back up for Azaz, we signed Dobbin and JWP who can play there.

CM - Downes is fittest he has been. Bragg was just getting his first team experience during the winter and is likely to be better. Charles is a good player, and will have a very good career but played less than half our minutes in the second half of the season, and personally I rate JWP higher for the influence he will have on games, and delivery. I would say stronger.

CB  - too early to be definitive, we have lost THB and his passing , now have an experienced left footer and Abbott - I would say more competitive but undecided on quality

So I disagree, it is very debatable and respectfully disagree

[saintant]

15 hours ago, VectisSaint said:

Swansea have 2 + Stewart 😉

So just the two then.

[a1ex2001]

11 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

I don't think a comparison vs the bad 1st half season is particularly useful. Against post January we are definitely weaker all down the spine. The only debate is over the degree of weakness.

Weaker all down the spine seems a bit of an over reaction, we've lost three first team player in THB, Shea and Stewart.  The German lad looks a perfectly adequate replacement for THB, JWP is at least as good as Shea which just leaves us lacking a little upfront but looking at Swansea's squads so far Stewart has once again gone AWOL so it would be fair to say any forward is better than him right now!

[Baird of the land]

1 minute ago, a1ex2001 said:

Weaker all down the spine seems a bit of an over reaction, we've lost three first team player in THB, Shea and Stewart.  The German lad looks a perfectly adequate replacement for THB, JWP is at least as good as Shea which just leaves us lacking a little upfront but looking at Swansea's squads so far Stewart has once again gone AWOL so it would be fair to say any forward is better than him right now!

Is adequate a replacement word for weaker, because in no way is Schlotterbeck on the same level as THB. We've already seen we don't want him with the ball at his feet too much.

I also don't think a 31 yr old prowsey is as good as Shea.

Don't think Long is as good as McCarthy(hopefully we won't ever see him)

I wonder if Stewart would have got that injury here, as our team did seem to have a learned best way to prepare him. If anything Mubama is the most uncertain downgrade, as he's a very talented youngster so by year end he may have developed and be considered an upgrade for more than fitness reasons.

 

[saintant]

2 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

Is adequate a replacement word for weaker, because in no way is Schlotterbeck on the same level as THB. We've already seen we don't want him with the ball at his feet too much.

I also don't think a 31 yr old prowsey is as good as Shea.

Don't think Long is as good as McCarthy(hopefully we won't ever see him)

I wonder if Stewart would have got that injury here, as our team did seem to have a learned best way to prepare him. If anything Mubama is the most uncertain downgrade, as he's a very talented youngster so by year end he may have developed and be considered an upgrade for more than fitness reasons.

 

If Ramsdale stays my guess is we will only ever see Long off the bench if Peretz gets injured during a match. If Peretz is injured then I would think Ramsdale will start in his place.

[Give it to Ron]

35 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

Is adequate a replacement word for weaker, because in no way is Schlotterbeck on the same level as THB. We've already seen we don't want him with the ball at his feet too much.

I also don't think a 31 yr old prowsey is as good as Shea.

Don't think Long is as good as McCarthy(hopefully we won't ever see him)

I wonder if Stewart would have got that injury here, as our team did seem to have a learned best way to prepare him. If anything Mubama is the most uncertain downgrade, as he's a very talented youngster so by year end he may have developed and be considered an upgrade for more than fitness reasons.

 

Dont want him with ball at his feet much! Christ did you miss all the passes he was making into feet? His passing was what led to most of our attacks. Yes he buggered up twice but who didn’t the other night. How many times did Leo lose it or Azaz letting them break on us.

Stewart not got that injury here ….are you forgetting he was out 3 months after a dive header. 

Edited 13 hours ago by Give it to Ron

[Give it to Ron]

Interesting a lot of people are ignoring Romeo West Ham performance. Where he actually carried it forward Shea like of course not on his level yet but I am hopeful we will see him blossom into that role.

[Gloucester Saint]

7 minutes ago, Give it to Ron said:

Interesting a lot of people are ignoring Romeo West Ham performance. Where he actually carried it forward Shea like of course not on his level yet but I am hopeful we will see him blossom into that role.

Has developed physically as well, won’t be easy to bully. 

[Rebel]

I am not sure JWP is better than Charles defensively. 

Maybe his experience will make him better positionally and his passing better at keeping possession but physcially I think we will miss Charles. 

We look very lightweight in midfield when it comes down to physical battle - which in some games it will.  

We are definitely weaker at centre forward without Stewart and Archer.  Mubama and Dobbin is a downgrade for now - despite Stewart's injury record.  

And until Roerslev proves his fitness probably weaker at right back without Jelert.  Although maybe that is where Zach Abbot comes in as cover at right back as much as centre back.

[Give it to Ron]

1 minute ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Has developed physically as well, won’t be easy to bully. 

I think that’s what struck me too he wasn’t easily pushed off the ball

[Sheaf Saint]

10 minutes ago, Rebel said:

I am not sure JWP is better than Charles defensively. 

Maybe his experience will make him better positionally and his passing better at keeping possession but physcially I think we will miss Charles. 

Agree with this. Charles, for all his good points, was often very sloppy with his passing and frequently put our defence under pressure with misplaced passes straight to opponents in our own half. JWP is light years ahead of him in this regard.

[a1ex2001]

1 hour ago, Baird of the land said:

Is adequate a replacement word for weaker, because in no way is Schlotterbeck on the same level as THB. We've already seen we don't want him with the ball at his feet too much.

I also don't think a 31 yr old prowsey is as good as Shea.

Don't think Long is as good as McCarthy(hopefully we won't ever see him)

I wonder if Stewart would have got that injury here, as our team did seem to have a learned best way to prepare him. If anything Mubama is the most uncertain downgrade, as he's a very talented youngster so by year end he may have developed and be considered an upgrade for more than fitness reasons.

 

I've yet to see anything from Schlotterbeck to suggest he isn't a good enough replacement for THB at this level particularly, so he misplaced a couple of passes in a poor team performance the other night it's not like THB never made a mistake, prior to christmas last season plenty of people would have told you he was average at best and happily seen him move on for 30million.  Yes he was a good player for us but lets not turn him into peak van Dijk!

I really don't see it with Shea, again he was a good player for us (mainly off the bench in the second half of the season) JWP is still in the prime of his career it's not like he is some unfit 36 year old with a terrible injury record, he might not have the potential to get better that shea still has but he should be comfortably one of the best midfielders in the Championship.

Lets not pretend Stewarts injury problems had miraculously disappeared last year, how many times did he play 90 minutes or start two games in a week he was a carefully managed crock who managed to stay just about fit long enough to score a few goals.  There is every chance he would have missed large chunks of the season once again  and a top prospect like Mubama would likely not have come here had Stewart still been here.

If we loose Peretz is injured I would be amazed if Ramsdale wasn't suddenly available for selection but only time will tell and McCarthy was pants so replacing a pants player (who hardly played last season) with another pants player (who will hardly play) isn't weakening our spine!

[Hengistbury Header]

In reference to the number of concerns voiced here about our transfer business at CB  and CF, the latest Echo article by Alfie House makes it clear how many times we were turned down or outbid when shopping for those positions.

[revolution saint]

6 minutes ago, a1ex2001 said:

I've yet to see anything from Schlotterbeck to suggest he isn't a good enough replacement for THB at this level particularly, so he misplaced a couple of passes in a poor team performance the other night it's not like THB never made a mistake, prior to christmas last season plenty of people would have told you he was average at best and happily seen him move on for 30million.  Yes he was a good player for us but lets not turn him into peak van Dijk!

I really don't see it with Shea, again he was a good player for us (mainly off the bench in the second half of the season) JWP is still in the prime of his career it's not like he is some unfit 36 year old with a terrible injury record, he might not have the potential to get better that shea still has but he should be comfortably one of the best midfielders in the Championship.

Lets not pretend Stewarts injury problems had miraculously disappeared last year, how many times did he play 90 minutes or start two games in a week he was a carefully managed crock who managed to stay just about fit long enough to score a few goals.  There is every chance he would have missed large chunks of the season once again  and a top prospect like Mubama would likely not have come here had Stewart still been here.

If we loose Peretz is injured I would be amazed if Ramsdale wasn't suddenly available for selection but only time will tell and McCarthy was pants so replacing a pants player (who hardly played last season) with another pants player (who will hardly play) isn't weakening our spine!

Is Schlotterbeck a replacement for THB?  Had we not sold him, THB would have been playing alongside him.  Club clearly wanted someone else in which is why they were going for Falchener and the Austrian lad.

[Pip]

I’m interested to see how Nathan Wood does alongside a more composed partner. Not done too much wrong so far.

[Oh no Mick Mills]

14 minutes ago, Pip said:

I’m interested to see how Nathan Wood does alongside a more composed partner. Not done too much wrong so far.

Schlotterbeck looks decent but he got away with 2 bad errors on Tues with Stansfield hitting the post .

We all know the reaction on social media if Stephens had done this but Schlotterbeck is newbie and deserves a run of games . 

It's going to be interesting to see who ends up being the 2 main men at the back as the season progresses.  

Edited 11 hours ago by Oh no Mick Mills

[trousers]

9 minutes ago, Oh no Mick Mills said:

Schlotterbeck looks decent but he got away with 2 bad errors on Tues with Stansfield hitting the post .

We all know the reaction on social media if Stephens had done this but Schlotterbeck is newbie and deserves a run of games . 

It's going to be interesting to see who ends up being the 2 main men at the back as the season progresses.  

I guess the difference between Stephens' and Schlotterbeck's cock ups is the context...

When Stephens messes up, it's often against the backdrop of an overall sub-par performance, whereas Schlotterbeck's misdemeanors were in stark contrast to the other 99% of his game...

In other words, people tend to forgive the odd mistake here and there if they're more the exception than the rule... 

Edited 11 hours ago by trousers

[Baird of the land]

4 minutes ago, trousers said:

I guess the difference between Stephens' and Schlotterbeck's cock ups is the context...

When Stephens messes up, it's often against the backdrop of an overall sub-par performance, whereas Schlotterbeck's misdemeanors were in stark contrast to the other 99% of his game...

In other words, people tend to forgive the odd mistake here and there if they're more the exception than the rule... 

People tend to forgive mistakes if they don't lead to goals. If he keeps gifting opposition glorious chances like that it won't matter how the other 99% of his game is.

[trousers]

6 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

People tend to forgive mistakes if they don't lead to goals. If he keeps gifting opposition glorious chances like that it won't matter how the other 99% of his game is.

Fair point 👍🏻

[Oh no Mick Mills]

56 minutes ago, Pip said:

I’m interested to see how Nathan Wood does alongside a more composed partner. Not done too much wrong so far.

 

35 minutes ago, trousers said:

I guess the difference between Stephens' and Schlotterbeck's cock ups is the context...

When Stephens messes up, it's often against the backdrop of an overall sub-par performance, whereas Schlotterbeck's misdemeanors were in stark contrast to the other 99% of his game...

In other words, people tend to forgive the odd mistake here and there if they're more the exception than the rule... 

Stephens is pretty average imo , many feel he's alot worse than that! 

I've always felt he's prejudiced against because he replaced arguably our best ever CB pairing in VVD and Fonte and he's miles off that level and that has stayed with many fans.

We all know his weaknesses but overall I thought he was fine last season and he made no more errors than THB or Wood ....but , I'm all for replacing him if we can find genuine upgrades... for me the jury is still out on Wood, Schlotterbeck and the new young lad as well ...let's see what happens. 

 

[Saint Pete]

1 hour ago, Hengistbury Header said:

In reference to the number of concerns voiced here about our transfer business at CB  and CF, the latest Echo article by Alfie House makes it clear how many times we were turned down or outbid when shopping for those positions.

Well yes, in terms of the striker position, those who insist we are fine in terms of backup might want to consider why Saints were bidding £5m+£2m on deadline day for Charlton striker Mbick? Clearly, the club themselves thought we could do with one more as cover after all of the departures or they wouldn't have done that, no?

[a1ex2001]

2 hours ago, revolution saint said:

Is Schlotterbeck a replacement for THB?  Had we not sold him, THB would have been playing alongside him.  Club clearly wanted someone else in which is why they were going for Falchener and the Austrian lad.

Which ever way you look at it he has replaced him in the team, maybe not like for like but he is clearly going to be our first choice going forward, obviously the club wanted another but couldn't get them doesn't stop him being a replacement.

[revolution saint]

1 minute ago, a1ex2001 said:

Which ever way you look at it he has replaced him in the team, maybe not like for like but he is clearly going to be our first choice going forward, obviously the club wanted another but couldn't get them doesn't stop him being a replacement.

He's only replaced him in the team because we couldn't sign the players we'd initially targeted.  He was brought in to push Stephens and Wood down the pecking order and improve the left side of central defence. 

Doesn't really make much difference but just seems a bit of a revisionist argument to suggest this was the plan all along.

[Daft Kerplunk]

We are weak up front if Larin gets injured but should we be there or there or therabouts come January and Mumbama hasn't shown he can step up to the level of a promotion-chasing team, you'd hope that resources would be allocated to buy a decent CF.  If we don't go up this year, it will be a long time before we are in a position to do so again given the nature of the game so we all have to hope there is a plan beyond the start of the season's squad.  

[Saint Pete]

14 minutes ago, Daft Kerplunk said:

We are weak up front if Larin gets injured but should we be there or there or therabouts come January and Mumbama hasn't shown he can step up to the level of a promotion-chasing team, you'd hope that resources would be allocated to buy a decent CF.  If we don't go up this year, it will be a long time before we are in a position to do so again given the nature of the game so we all have to hope there is a plan beyond the start of the season's squad.  

I guess the worry with that is that we may not be there or thereabouts if Mubama doesn't cut it and we have left ourselves without enough suitable options to cover Larin until January, but let's hope for the best! On the positive side, Larin has by and large looked superb so far (with a bit of a dip on Tuesday) so if he avoids injury and we can find ways of keeping him fresh, we should have enough to at least be in contention, especially if we can continue to find goals amongst the rest of the team. 

[Saint86]

2 minutes ago, Saint Pete said:

I guess the worry with that is that we may not be there or thereabouts if Mubama doesn't cut it and we have left ourselves without enough suitable options to cover Larin until January, but let's hope for the best! On the positive side, Larin has by and large looked superb so far (with a bit of a dip on Tuesday) so if he avoids injury and we can find ways of keeping him fresh, we should have enough to at least be in contention, especially if we can continue to find goals amongst the rest of the team. 

Suspect there is a view from the club that (as per last season) we can strengthen in January and go on a run. Probably with a great degree of confidence that we'll be in a far better position come the start of 2027 than we were at the start of 2026. 

[hypochondriac]

8 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

Suspect there is a view from the club that (as per last season) we can strengthen in January and go on a run. Probably with a great degree of confidence that we'll be in a far better position come the start of 2027 than we were at the start of 2026. 

Wed have to go some to have another 22 game unbeaten run though. Those sort of runs are relatively uncommon.

[Saint86]

3 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Wed have to go some to have another 22 game unbeaten run though. Those sort of runs are relatively uncommon.

Yeah ofc, but my point is that we really shouldn't be needing that sort of run this season.

[manji]

Tonda said recently he wants/expects goals from all positions ( Peretz last minute header ?) and why wouldn’t we be after striker at last minute it doesn’t mean they thought we wouldn’t get goals.

And as for or Scholotterbeck he has had a ridiculous amount of experience in Bundesliga quite often turning into a shouty leader bit like Stevens without the mistakes. He has said he expects to score goals when he gets used to EPL. You can see what a really good player he is. He could easily seen out his career in Bundesliga so to go for the EPL shows good motivation. 
I still believe Spors and all are already thinking ahead and already there’s a big expectation we will be in Premier League next season. That’s not arrogance that’s good attitude. 

[Mr X]

Damion downes has been a great signing.... No way should we ship that one out 

[Weston Super Saint]

19 minutes ago, manji said:

Tonda said recently he wants/expects goals from all positions ( Peretz last minute header ?) and why wouldn’t we be after striker at last minute it doesn’t mean they thought we wouldn’t get goals.

And as for or Scholotterbeck he has had a ridiculous amount of experience in Bundesliga quite often turning into a shouty leader bit like Stevens without the mistakes. He has said he expects to score goals when he gets used to EPL. You can see what a really good player he is. He could easily seen out his career in Bundesliga so to go for the EPL shows good motivation. 
I still believe Spors and all are already thinking ahead and already there’s a big expectation we will be in Premier League next season. That’s not arrogance that’s good attitude. 

Is that a quote from him not knowing which league we play in or is it you that is confused?

[qwertyell]

Perhaps we were a little cautious with our spending with one eye on January, and the prospect of having to bring in a few new players that suit a possibly different manager's style.

[Saint Pete]

45 minutes ago, manji said:

Tonda said recently he wants/expects goals from all positions ( Peretz last minute header ?) and why wouldn’t we be after striker at last minute it doesn’t mean they thought we wouldn’t get goals.

And as for or Scholotterbeck he has had a ridiculous amount of experience in Bundesliga quite often turning into a shouty leader bit like Stevens without the mistakes. He has said he expects to score goals when he gets used to EPL. You can see what a really good player he is. He could easily seen out his career in Bundesliga so to go for the EPL shows good motivation. 
I still believe Spors and all are already thinking ahead and already there’s a big expectation we will be in Premier League next season. That’s not arrogance that’s good attitude. 

Well, folks on here have been arguing our options and depth in strikers is absolutely fine, so if that's true, why would the club choose to spend £5m+ add ons on another striker? Particularly as the view seems to be we needed to bank much of the cash from the outgoings against our debts. 

Edited 6 hours ago by Saint Pete

[Saint86]

14 minutes ago, Saint Pete said:

Well, folks on here have been arguing our options and depth in strikers is absolutely fine, so if that's true, why would the club choose to spend £5m+ add ons on another striker? Particularly as the view seems to be we needed to bank much of the cash from the outgoings against our debts. 

Has anyone said its absolutely fine? I think best case there has been a general acknowledgement that needs must and we are gambling on no injury to Larin.

[saintant]

4 hours ago, Pip said:

I’m interested to see how Nathan Wood does alongside a more composed partner. Not done too much wrong so far.

In his two games alongside Schlott I think Wood has been pretty good so stick with that and hope the partnership grows.

[saintant]

2 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

Has anyone said its absolutely fine? I think best case there has been a general acknowledgement that needs must and we are gambling on no injury to Larin.

Hopefully, rather than gambling on no injury to Larin, we are working in training sessions to utilise Mubama to his strengths. Clearly it is pointless knocking long balls around his head because that is not his style of centre forward play.  I see him as an alternative to Larin rather than a like for like so presumably Tonda is working on drills at Staplewood. Assuming that is the case he's going to have to start him in a match sooner rather than later to see how it goes. Otherwise Mubama just becomes a sub for 20 minutes with us lumping balls to him which will achieve very little.

[VectisSaint]

1 hour ago, hypochondriac said:

Wed have to go some to have another 22 game unbeaten run though. Those sort of runs are relatively uncommon.

We had a long unbeaten run in the previous Championship season as well, 23/24. I can't recall/find the exact numbers.

OK the alternate years are a bit of a problem where we are lucky to get a 1 game unbeaten run.

[MarkSFC]

I am a little disappointed (and a tad nervous) that an injury to Larin will derail us a bit too much. Clearly we only need to get through to Jan 1st in that sense. I hope that the lack of an addition in attack was a principled one and not a foolish one. I mean,  that they were only prepared to bring in the right player rather than just anyone, and also that they were not going to pay way over the odds. 

Time will of course as always, prove what was right.

We have a decent squad. Im excited by Schlotterbeck and also Abbott now Ive researched him a bit and we may well be stronger in CB now. 

Prowsey dictated the tempo when we had the ball on Tuesday and looked a class above Bragg in terms of touch and passing, and keeping the ball moving. JWP will be a great teacher for Bragg and the others. When Jander is back in full flow we will have as strong a CM as lasy year even if a little different in attributed overall. 

With Ramsdale still here even an injury to Peretz does not full me with dread even if TE has hinted at Long being 2nd choice. I can believe he would be if Peretz was out for a few months. 

Lets hope that by January 1st arrives we have clawed back our 4 point deficit and are at least in the top 4 if not top 2. I think we might well be. 

[hypochondriac]

1 hour ago, VectisSaint said:

We had a long unbeaten run in the previous Championship season as well, 23/24. I can't recall/find the exact numbers.

OK the alternate years are a bit of a problem where we are lucky to get a 1 game unbeaten run.

I know. Doesn't make it a common occurance though!

[VectisSaint]

1 hour ago, MarkSFC said:

I am a little disappointed (and a tad nervous) that an injury to Larin will derail us a bit too much. Clearly we only need to get through to Jan 1st in that sense. I hope that the lack of an addition in attack was a principled one and not a foolish one. I mean,  that they were only prepared to bring in the right player rather than just anyone, and also that they were not going to pay way over the odds. 

Time will of course as always, prove what was right.

We have a decent squad. Im excited by Schlotterbeck and also Abbott now Ive researched him a bit and we may well be stronger in CB now. 

Prowsey dictated the tempo when we had the ball on Tuesday and looked a class above Bragg in terms of touch and passing, and keeping the ball moving. JWP will be a great teacher for Bragg and the others. When Jander is back in full flow we will have as strong a CM as lasy year even if a little different in attributed overall. 

With Ramsdale still here even an injury to Peretz does not full me with dread even if TE has hinted at Long being 2nd choice. I can believe he would be if Peretz was out for a few months. 

Lets hope that by January 1st arrives we have clawed back our 4 point deficit and are at least in the top 4 if not top 2. I think we might well be. 

We won't sign anyone on Jan 1st whatever state we are in. Jan 31st more reasonable target. 5 league matches later.

[Weston Super Saint]

46 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

I know. Doesn't make it a common occurance though!

It's happened 66% of the time over the last 3 seasons.  That's pretty common

[swedish dave]

On 02/09/2026 at 15:51, trousers said:

Dave... I think I've asked this before, so apologies for not remembering the answer...

Is there a particular reason why you break up your sentences with carriage returns and blank lines?

It's just that it jars a tad when reading your posts, and i often find myself skipping over them as a result, which is a shame given I enjoy your content. 

Bit of a first world gripe, admittedly, but just my curiosity getting the better of me (for once  )

🙂

well firstly trousers, thanks for your comment. I  realise that my "style" maybe a bit personal, and you're not 

the first person to make such a comment. I don't do it to annoy, but it's the product of 30-odd years working

as language consultant with "a lot of foreigners" mostly Swedes, and re-working / creating speeches and 

presentations. It's nearly all verbal, and grammar often goes out of the door in favour of strong emphasis on 

meanings and explanations plus a little humour, and occasional sarcasm. Don't know if that makes sense ?

 

Your tally of 60K postings is very impressive, and I often find myself agreeing with your comments.

The fan site "lost" umpteen thousand of my old posts last year (going back a decade or more) and I had to 

"re-invent" myself with a variation of my name in order to placate the system, and get back onto the site. 

 

The "broken sentences" you refer to are a likely fall back to my schooldays, when teachers used to write

" paragraph this work" in red ink when returning my essays. I'm still trying to do this when I change the subject

and keep to the context. Well that's my excuse, and it's going to be a bit tough to try and change now 

as I am rapidly approaching 80 (!)

My first Dell game was back in 1959, watching Stanley Matthews in an FA Cup game for Blackpool. 

Nowadays, I often watch games online, as health issues are beginning to limit travel plans to the UK.

 

 

 

[trousers]

Cheers Dave - appreciate you going to the trouble of answering my somewhat intrusive question!

I wouldn't call my post tally "impressive" as most of it is meaningless twaddle! (With the odd nugget of genius secreted discretely here and there, I'll grant you that... ) 

Keep posting sir!

Edited 3 hours ago by trousers

[Zorba]

38 minutes ago, trousers said:

Cheers Dave - appreciate you going to the trouble of answering my somewhat intrusive question!

I wouldn't call my post tally "impressive" as most of it is meaningless twaddle! (With the odd nugget excreted discretely here and there, I'll grant you that... ) 

Keep posting sir!

😳

[suewhistle]

Excreted nugget of what!?

[Paulwantsapint81]

Any chance of some free agents signing ?