benjii Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 8 minutes ago, die Mannyschaft said: Mexico unbeaten at home 21 games I think bbc said They've only lost eleven matches at the Azteca stadium since it was built. In 1966. But they haven't beaten many good teams either. Edited 16 hours ago by benjii
Saint Fan CaM Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 8 minutes ago, Window Cleaner said: Norway's game is too complicated for their skill set. Looks like they’ve sorted that out. Or rather Haaland did. Edited 16 hours ago by Saint Fan CaM
die Mannyschaft Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 1 minute ago, Baird of the land said: Haaland was nearly embarrassed by his attempt at an uber casual finish. How many tap ins does this guy get ! 1
die Mannyschaft Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Baird of the land said: Haaland was nearly embarrassed by his attempt at an uber casual finish. How many tap ins does this guy get !
die Mannyschaft Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago France 5-0 Sweden? This cant go to extra time or pens. Sweden must be 5,000/1 to win on pens.
Turkish Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 34 minutes ago, benjii said: These Norway fans are ghey. Don’t like the row? It’s cool as fuck embrace the bantz bro
East Kent Saint Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Saint Fan CaM said: Looks like they’ve sorted that out. Or rather Haaland did. They failed to supply him for the rest of the match , he just stood around waiting for a cross or ball to feet that never came ! Norway got in a couple of good positions but failed to shoot at the goal Odegaard a prime example .
Sheaf Saint Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 37 minutes ago, die Mannyschaft said: How many tap ins does this guy get ! You make your own luck.
Lee On Solent Saint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 49 minutes ago, Turkish said: Don’t like the row? It’s cool as fuck embrace the bantz bro Odegaard with the drum was a fun touch. 1
hypochondriac Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago France look ridiculously good. How anyone thinks England would have a prayer against them I have no idea. 3
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 4 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: France look ridiculously good. How anyone thinks England would have a prayer against them I have no idea. Sweden have had some chances though.
hypochondriac Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Just now, Holmes_and_Watson said: Sweden have had some chances though. I missed the first 15 minutes but it was one way traffic from the bits I saw.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 7 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: I missed the first 15 minutes but it was one way traffic from the bits I saw. Well obviously I'm going to say that's when Sweden were world beaters, as it supports my view. 🙂 1
hypochondriac Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: Well obviously I'm going to say that's when Sweden were world beaters, as it supports my view. 🙂 I bow to your superior knowledge!
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 45 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: I bow to your superior knowledge! It's just a shame that, due to rights issues, there's no highlights of that game available. Ever. So, you'll have to take my word for it. 🙂
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Advertised handily just ahead of the World Cup... For a mere 1400 dollars Football: The Impossible Collection distills the sport into 100 defining moments, not simply the greatest, but the most culturally seismic. 236 pages, most of which are covered by over 150 pics.
Dark Munster Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 7 hours ago, Window Cleaner said: Yes, there are so many teams playing below their level. Hard to pick a winner of the WC really,any team could go out on an off day. France. Easy! 2
AlexLaw76 Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago (edited) We ain’t getting beyond Mexico in their own backyard I know the yanks can’t stop patting themselves on the back for having large stadiums and the world should be thankful, but they have nothing in terms of an iconic arena compared to the Azteca Edited 4 hours ago by AlexLaw76 3
hypochondriac Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 34 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: We ain’t getting beyond Mexico in their own backyard I know the yanks can’t stop patting themselves on the back for having large stadiums and the world should be thankful, but they have nothing in terms of an iconic arena compared to the Azteca Yep. No guarantees but more likely than not to win today I would have thought. After that it will take something really special to beat Mexico and I don't think we have it in us. Out in the round of 32. 1
Osvaldorama Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Dunno why there’s so much negativity about us, we haven’t been that good so far but we’ve still topped the group easily which is a lot better than most world cups in my life time. That said, everyone may as well pack up now as no one is beating France.
hypochondriac Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: Dunno why there’s so much negativity about us, we haven’t been that good so far but we’ve still topped the group easily which is a lot better than most world cups in my life time. That said, everyone may as well pack up now as no one is beating France. It's not negativity I'm just being realistic. Obviously I'd love us to smash Congo and look brilliant doing so which would improve our chances of giving Mexico a game. If lose to them people will start suckling off Southgate but there's zero chance he would beat Mexico.
Verbal Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said: We ain’t getting beyond Mexico in their own backyard I know the yanks can’t stop patting themselves on the back for having large stadiums and the world should be thankful, but they have nothing in terms of an iconic arena compared to the Azteca I've seen it up close and the Azteca is glorious. And nothing quite irritates me more about this World Cup (aside from the scandalous, vindictive abuse by the Trump regime of the Iran team) than the common American claim that their stadiums outshine European ones. They are bigger, yes, but most are utter shit for football. They're built not just for different sports but for a different sporting culture. The vast and numerous parking lots that surround them are designed for American football and baseball fans who can never stop eating, with "tailgate parties" starting hours before the game. This eating frenzy then continues in the stadiums with food hawkers going up and down the extra-wide, extra-numerous aisles passing blobs of fat burger to ever fatter people. In American sports, attention paid to what's going on on the pitch is slight. Sport is experienced as an individual - it isn't a collective, communal thing at all. Hence, among other things, no real actual noise other than when a goal is scored, no edge, and no humour (oh god how I'd miss this if stuck there). My son went to the England Panama game, played at the MetLife in a New Jersey wasteland. This is the venue for the final. Whoever designed it thought that as an East Coast venue of a winter sport, the stadium didn't need a roof of any kind. The downpour before and during the match meant there wasn't a dry seat, or person, in the stadium. Unfettered commercialism makes the pitch-side parts of the stadium - weirdly devoid of fans and consisting, seemingly, of air ducts, ad screens and scaffolding - a cluttered, ugly mess. It's also not designed to have well built-up ends (because: see above) - the one in Foxborough is even worse, with one end taken up with the largest screen you've ever seen along with what appears to be a vast abandoned greenhouse. Oh, and the pitch at MetLife is worse than anything you'd see in League 2 - swampy and weirdly uneven. It seems FIFA has applied no quality to control at all to pitch preparation and devoted their attention to dynamic pricing instead. Great football (often) but shit major US venues. 4
skintsaint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Congo, then Mexico - piece of piss. Brazil will be the tasty game.
Window Cleaner Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said: Dunno why there’s so much negativity about us, we haven’t been that good so far but we’ve still topped the group easily which is a lot better than most world cups in my life time. That said, everyone may as well pack up now as no one is beating France. Who knows, France can be shaky at the back and the keeper sometimes panics. They haven't played anyone serious yet, same as most teams, because of the enlarged group stages. 1
saintant Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, skintsaint said: Congo, then Mexico - piece of piss. Brazil will be the tasty game. If we manage to scrape past Congo I don't see us beating Mexico in the Azteca - it will be a cauldron and their record there is very impressive.
Nordic Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 15 hours ago, benjii said: They've only lost eleven matches at the Azteca stadium since it was built. In 1966. But they haven't beaten many good teams either. Mexico have only lost 2 out of 89 competitive matches at the Azteca. The only teams to beat them in any competition - Costa Rica in 2001 and Honduras in 2013 -were used to similar conditions.
Osvaldorama Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago (edited) Could throw out all kinds of pro-England stats. I think they are beatable. Will be tough but we’ve beaten better teams with Kane/Jude/Rice. With some luck we can beat anyone in this tournament except France, imo Edited 49 minutes ago by Osvaldorama
Nordic Saint Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago (edited) 16 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: Could throw out all kinds of pro-England stats. I think they are beatable. Will be tough but we’ve beaten better teams with Kane/Jude/Rice. With some luck we can beat anyone in this tournament except France, imo Just as long as our players have secretly been having altitude training for the past few months, they'll be fine at the Azteca. At Estadio Azteca’s elevation there is about 25% less oxygen available per breath than at sea level. So, you’re breathing in about a quarter less oxygen at Azteca compared with Wembley. If you're not used to it, you'll find any physical activity difficult. Edited 33 minutes ago by Nordic Saint
Window Cleaner Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago What a lot of nervous nellies. England will beat Mexico on Sunday.
Sarnia Cherie Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago 15 hours ago, benjii said: These Norway fans are ghey. Why? Embracing their Viking heritage? At least people will remember them. Much like the Netherlands and their Orange Dance. Respect their ways.
Sarnia Cherie Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago 2 hours ago, skintsaint said: Congo, then Mexico - piece of piss. Brazil will be the tasty game. Hopefully it will be Norway, not Brazil.
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted 18 minutes ago Posted 18 minutes ago If we make it to the Azteca I guess there won’t be so many England fans nabbing tickets so will be up against it in, as someone mentioned, a cauldron of a stadium. Add in the altitude and I think we would be setting up to conserve energy which they may thrive on. Tough gig but let’s try and get past ‘Doctor’ Congo first!
M271 Posted 11 minutes ago Posted 11 minutes ago (edited) If we win today it would be wise to travel to an at altitude training camp ASAP. It doesn’t take long for the body to initially adapt to the reduced oxygen content but the longer the better, although it takes some weeks to fully adapt for strenuous activities. Edited 6 minutes ago by M271
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted 2 minutes ago Posted 2 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, M271 said: If we win today it would be wise to travel to an at altitude training camp ASAP. It doesn’t take long for the body to initially adapt to the reduced oxygen content but the longer the better, although it takes some weeks to fully adapt for strenuous activities. At least the weather forecast is favourable on Sunday, around 23 degrees, plenty of cloud and some rain. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now