Jump to content

Donald Trump Appreciation Thread


Guided Missile

Saints Web Official US election  

87 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you vote for?

    • Biden
      70
    • Trump
      17


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Fan The Flames said:

You're mixed up again, there was no alarm when Trump was given ronapreve. The alarm was for him advocating a tremendous light and washing the inside of your body. Then there was a bit of mocking when he did get ill because he didn't go for the crazy alternative therapies he was advocating for the man in the street, but straight for proper regular medicine, you know the type developed and by those awful experts and scientists. It's good that this treatment is now available for everyone and not just shit American presidents.

Show a bit of gratitude to Trump, his government and cast that goldfish brain of yours and your fellow socialist ingrates, back a year ago, if you can:

Trump.jpg.ad56bae3dd29d75acd0b355148d935cc.jpg

Six months after the former GlaxoSmithKline executive, Moncef Slaoui, left the private sector to become President Donald Trump’s coronavirus vaccine tsar, Mr Slaoui feels his decision has been vindicated, and critics of the ability of Operation Warp Speed to develop a vaccine in record time having been proved wrong.

“The easy answer for experts was to say it was impossible and find reasons why the operation would never work,” he told the Financial Times. But the vaccine push is now hailed as the bright spot in the Trump administration’s Covid-19 response, as products from Pfizer and BioNTech, Moderna, and AstraZeneca and Oxford university move closer to approval.

Operation Warp Speed is a more than $10bn investment programme with a remit to fund vaccines, therapeutics — such as two recently approved antibody treatments — and diagnostics. The entire planet is going to benefit from it. We’re going to . . . hopefully have a vaccine available in France and Spain and Italy, all paid for by the US government
Stéphane Bancel, Moderna chief executive

So far it has spent the vast majority of its money on Covid-19 vaccines. 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guided Missile said:

Show a bit of gratitude to Trump, his government and cast that goldfish brain of yours and your fellow socialist ingrates, back a year ago, if you can:

Trump.jpg.ad56bae3dd29d75acd0b355148d935cc.jpg

Six months after the former GlaxoSmithKline executive, Moncef Slaoui, left the private sector to become President Donald Trump’s coronavirus vaccine tsar, Mr Slaoui feels his decision has been vindicated, and critics of the ability of Operation Warp Speed to develop a vaccine in record time having been proved wrong.

“The easy answer for experts was to say it was impossible and find reasons why the operation would never work,” he told the Financial Times. But the vaccine push is now hailed as the bright spot in the Trump administration’s Covid-19 response, as products from Pfizer and BioNTech, Moderna, and AstraZeneca and Oxford university move closer to approval.

Operation Warp Speed is a more than $10bn investment programme with a remit to fund vaccines, therapeutics — such as two recently approved antibody treatments — and diagnostics. The entire planet is going to benefit from it. We’re going to . . . hopefully have a vaccine available in France and Spain and Italy, all paid for by the US government
Stéphane Bancel, Moderna chief executive

So far it has spent the vast majority of its money on Covid-19 vaccines. 

 

The pharmaceutical company's with the massive government financial backing have pulled it off, that's for sure. But it was the only game in town, even for the conspiracy riddled idiot.

I wonder how many times in the last five years in light of new revelations you have had to double down and lie to yourself. You are truly a top trump solider, he would be proud of you, if he actually gave a shit.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Top US defence officials have said the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan can be traced back to a deal between the group and the Trump administration.

The so-called Doha agreement was signed in February 2020 and set a date for the US to withdraw its troops.

Gen Frank McKenzie said the deal had a "really pernicious effect" on the Afghan government and military.

Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin agreed, saying the agreement had helped the Taliban get "stronger"."

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-58738953

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

"Top US defence officials have said the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan can be traced back to a deal between the group and the Trump administration.

The so-called Doha agreement was signed in February 2020 and set a date for the US to withdraw its troops.

Gen Frank McKenzie said the deal had a "really pernicious effect" on the Afghan government and military.

Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin agreed, saying the agreement had helped the Taliban get "stronger"."

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-58738953

Better headline: 'Generals try to save their jobs by putting blame on someone else.'

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

So finally my thread has been justified by todays news and Putin has shown the socialist pussies on this site how wrong they were and Trump and I were right:

Quote

Putin wouldn't be invading if Trump were still in the White House
The enemies of the free world see this period as a window of opportunity within which to undermine and erode American leadership

Quote

Wuhan lab leak theory ‘accepted as likely behind closed doors at No 10’
Biosecurity expert helping Government to prevent future pandemics claims ministers consider leak as most likely origin of Covid pandemic

Quote

Thank God Jeremy Corbyn isn't in charge
As Russia invades Ukraine and challenges Nato, we are reminded why Corbyn's worldview is so dangerous

I hate to be so right. Don't get me started on Zero Carbon, though. Shame Boris got indoctrinated by a cult promoted by his latest wife. Trump saw it for what it was. Right about NATO cheapskates like Germany and Merkel's big mistake with Nord Stream 2 as well. 

I miss him. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guided Missile said:

So finally my thread has been justified by todays news and Putin has shown the socialist pussies on this site how wrong they were and Trump and I were right:

I hate to be so right. Don't get me started on Zero Carbon, though. Shame Boris got indoctrinated by a cult promoted by his latest wife. Trump saw it for what it was. Right about NATO cheapskates like Germany and Merkel's big mistake with Nord Stream 2 as well. 

I miss him. 

Once a twat, always a twat.

( Trump, GM, or both - dear reader, you decide )

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

In a statement released Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump said the Russian aggression toward Ukraine would not have happened if he were still president. During the radio interview, Mr. Trump said he and Mr. Putin discussed a potential invasion of Ukraine when Mr. Trump was in the White House. “I knew that he always wanted Ukraine. I used to talk to him about it,” Mr. Trump said. “I said, ‘You can’t do it. You’re not going to do it.’ But I could see that he wanted it. I used to ask him. We used to talk about it at length.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Guided Missile said:
Quote

In a statement released Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump said the Russian aggression toward Ukraine would not have happened if he were still president. During the radio interview, Mr. Trump said he and Mr. Putin discussed a potential invasion of Ukraine when Mr. Trump was in the White House. “I knew that he always wanted Ukraine. I used to talk to him about it,” Mr. Trump said. “I said, ‘You can’t do it. You’re not going to do it.’ But I could see that he wanted it. I used to ask him. We used to talk about it at length.”

Of course it would not have happened the same way, the US would have done even less to stop him. Donnie would have been in Vlad's pocket.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Guided Missile said:
Quote

In a statement released Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump said the Russian aggression toward Ukraine would not have happened if he were still president. During the radio interview, Mr. Trump said he and Mr. Putin discussed a potential invasion of Ukraine when Mr. Trump was in the White House. “I knew that he always wanted Ukraine. I used to talk to him about it,” Mr. Trump said. “I said, ‘You can’t do it. You’re not going to do it.’ But I could see that he wanted it. I used to ask him. We used to talk about it at length.”

Expand  

So because Trump said it wouldn’t have happened, it wouldn’t have happened?

Love is truly blind.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

So because Trump said it wouldn’t have happened, it wouldn’t have happened?

Love is truly blind.

The reverse is just as true. The myopic hatred for trump does not mean he would not have done better than Joe. The political bias and blindness on here is bewildering. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jessinkalasin said:

The reverse is just as true. The myopic hatred for trump does not mean he would not have done better than Joe. The political bias and blindness on here is bewildering. 

You have to the remember that Southampton has historically been a socialist, bordering on a Stalinist, state. This was a consequence of the unions iron grip on the docks and the generations of hypocritical dockers and their spawn, that suckled on the teats of the fat cow, that was Southampton docks, until containerisation turned the consequent unemployed labour force and their children into bitter, Tory hating, envy ridden socialists. Luckily for them the burgeoning public sector, largely financed by tax paying Tories and recalcitrant socialists, turned capitalists, gave them well paid jobs, from which they could continue to bite the hands that feed them. Keep posting, mate and you'll be able to taste the bitter envy that is Southampton. It is only bewildering to those that didn't grow up here in the 60's and 70's. Forget the stereotypes about lazy, rich Tories. The laziest and richest friends I had growing up, were all stevedores; union men and communists, the lot of them.    

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Guided Missile said:

You have to the remember that Southampton has historically been a socialist, bordering on a Stalinist, state. This was a consequence of the unions iron grip on the docks and the generations of hypocritical dockers and their spawn, that suckled on the teats of the fat cow, that was Southampton docks, until containerisation turned the consequent unemployed labour force and their children into bitter, Tory hating, envy ridden socialists. Luckily for them the burgeoning public sector, largely financed by tax paying Tories and recalcitrant socialists, turned capitalists, gave them well paid jobs, from which they could continue to bite the hands that feed them. Keep posting, mate and you'll be able to taste the bitter envy that is Southampton. It is only bewildering to those that didn't grow up here in the 60's and 70's. Forget the stereotypes about lazy, rich Tories. The laziest and richest friends I had growing up, were all stevedores; union men and communists, the lot of them.    

The difference between the corrupt, bullshitting, narcissist that is Trump, and yourself, is that I don't know enough about you to work out if you are corrupt.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guided Missile said:

You have to the remember that Southampton has historically been a socialist, bordering on a Stalinist, state. This was a consequence of the unions iron grip on the docks and the generations of hypocritical dockers and their spawn, that suckled on the teats of the fat cow, that was Southampton docks, until containerisation turned the consequent unemployed labour force and their children into bitter, Tory hating, envy ridden socialists. Luckily for them the burgeoning public sector, largely financed by tax paying Tories and recalcitrant socialists, turned capitalists, gave them well paid jobs, from which they could continue to bite the hands that feed them. Keep posting, mate and you'll be able to taste the bitter envy that is Southampton. It is only bewildering to those that didn't grow up here in the 60's and 70's. Forget the stereotypes about lazy, rich Tories. The laziest and richest friends I had growing up, were all stevedores; union men and communists, the lot of them.    

Southampton has never been a socialist bordering on Stalinist state.  I doubt you even know what those terms mean because if you did, you wouldn't be using them.   I suspect you may be suffering from dementia.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jessinkalasin said:

The reverse is just as true. The myopic hatred for trump does not mean he would not have done better than Joe. The political bias and blindness on here is bewildering. 

Trump would have been hopelessly compromised by his financial dependence on Russia. That's why he's always so full of praise for Putin because the survival of his business empire rests on him being compliant with Putin's wishes.

If Trump was still in the Whitehouse, the only way it would have changed the outcome in Ukraine is that the invasion would have happened sooner.

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jessinkalasin said:

The reverse is just as true. The myopic hatred for trump does not mean he would not have done better than Joe. The political bias and blindness on here is bewildering. 

Russia occupied part of Ukraine the whole time he was president and he did fuck all.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, revolution saint said:

Southampton has never been a socialist bordering on Stalinist state.  I doubt you even know what those terms mean because if you did, you wouldn't be using them.   I suspect you may be suffering from dementia... or have hit the bottle earlier than normal today.

Added a bit for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Guided Missile said:

You have to the remember that Southampton has historically been a socialist, bordering on a Stalinist, state. This was a consequence of the unions iron grip on the docks and the generations of hypocritical dockers and their spawn, that suckled on the teats of the fat cow, that was Southampton docks, until containerisation turned the consequent unemployed labour force and their children into bitter, Tory hating, envy ridden socialists. Luckily for them the burgeoning public sector, largely financed by tax paying Tories and recalcitrant socialists, turned capitalists, gave them well paid jobs, from which they could continue to bite the hands that feed them. Keep posting, mate and you'll be able to taste the bitter envy that is Southampton. It is only bewildering to those that didn't grow up here in the 60's and 70's. Forget the stereotypes about lazy, rich Tories. The laziest and richest friends I had growing up, were all stevedores; union men and communists, the lot of them.    

An alcoholic poisoner writes 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Throughout the post-war period dockers vied with coal miners as Britain's most strike-prone occupational group. The dockers' ‘occupational culture’, built on the casual nature of the employment, was believed by many to be a principal factor behind this militancy, but this alone cannot account for the pattern or level of conflict in Southampton Docks. Following decasualisation in 1967 and the progressive containerisation of cargo handling operations in the 1970s and 1980s, this occupational culture of the dockers, supported by their union, the T&GWU, was progressively undermined. By the late 1980s the National Dock Labour Scheme had become the central pillar of what remained of the dockers' occupational culture, and as the 1989 national dock strike illustrated, without the support of the Scheme the dockers were unable to mount any effective resistance to the attack on their terms and conditions of employment initiated by the employers and fully supported by Thatcher's Tory government. 
It is only a sociological study of working class imagery and consciousness, with an industrial relations analysis of the institutions, processes and structural conditions of workplace negotiations, over the wage-effort bargain, that it is possible to explain the nature and causes of dock strikes per se, the intensity of conflict in the Docks, and the consummate failure of the dockers in the 1989 strike and the resulting class divisions and bitterness that remains to this day. Since 1997, Southampton Test has been a comfortable Socialist seat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of these days GM wil make a post of more than one sentence that he has composed all on his own, mind you that would require that very rare occurrence - an original thought. You can sense the spittle flecking his lips and the twitch in the corner of his eye as he reads or types the word 'socialist'.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump called Putin a genius for occupying Ukraine for $2 of sanctions. 
Theres your democracy loving patriot right there.

For all the loathing I have for Tories I would never choose a Russian over my own people. A traitor of the highest order.

Should be tarred and feathered along with Farage and Banks for appeasing dictators.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Quote

 

Putin took Crimea in 2014, under Obama, and invaded Ukraine in 2022, under Biden, so it’s reasonable to guess that this invasion wouldn’t have happened under Trump because it didn’t.

Trump says this is because he told Putin he was ready to drop a bomb on Moscow (“He sort of believed me like 5 per cent or 10 per cent – that’s all you need”), which is embarrassing if a lie and terrifying if true, but it does fit with the substantive record of his administration.

Obama resisted sending lethal aid to Ukraine; Trump did so. From 2017-19, the Trump administration carried out 52 policy actions against Russia, ranging from sanctions to military action against Putin’s client Bashar al-Assad. When Assad used chemical weapons under Obama, America did not reply with force. When he tried the same trick under Trump, Trump hit a Syrian airbase with 59 tomahawk missiles. Separately, US commandos engaged directly with Syrian soldiers and Russian mercenaries. The details were classified but the President bragged about it at a fundraiser.

Russia wants, and will always want, a buffer zone to the West. Trump had no problem with that, in theory, and it was a mistake to needle Moscow with the threat of Nato extension.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just finished reading 'Disloyal' a book by Michael Cohen who was Trumps Personal Attorney for many years.

What a insight into the life of a proven liar, fraudster, racist, cheat and many other disparaging adjectives.

Trumps association with Putin was based on his admiration for Putin as 'the richest man in the world' and the fact that he was essentially the absolute ruler of Russia and could basically do want he wanted something that Trump did in a much smaller way as head of the Trump Organisation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, spyinthesky said:

I have just finished reading 'Disloyal' a book by Michael Cohen who was Trumps Personal Attorney for many years.

What a insight into the life of a proven liar, fraudster, racist, cheat and many other disparaging adjectives.

Trumps association with Putin was based on his admiration for Putin as 'the richest man in the world' and the fact that he was essentially the absolute ruler of Russia and could basically do want he wanted something that Trump did in a much smaller way as head of the Trump Organisation.

And probably had ideas on how to do so as POTUS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

“reasonable to guess”

A guess is just that. A wild stab in the dark.

Since when has a "reasonable guess" been a "wild stab in the dark"? What isn't a "wild stab in the dark" is that Putin invaded Ukraine during Biden's presidency, just after his surrender to the Taliban. Still, you stick with your socialist agenda, one that Putin has permanently killed, along with net zero carbon, appeasement and all the rest of the woke bollox. 

Great to see the clueless lefties squirm, while their third rate class warriors are destroyed with most of Ukraine. Thankfully, Blair is one of the latest, following on from Corbyn, et al.

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Guided Missile said:

Since when has a "reasonable guess" been a "wild stab in the dark"? What isn't a "wild stab in the dark" is that Putin invaded Ukraine during Biden's presidency, just after his surrender to the Taliban. Still, you stick with your socialist agenda, one that Putin has permanently killed, along with net zero carbon, appeasement and all the rest of the woke bollox. 

Great to see the clueless lefties squirm, while their third rate class warriors are destroyed with most of Ukraine. Thankfully, Blair is one of the latest, following on from Corbyn, et al.

Trump and GM rewriting history.....

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/18/politics/trump-afghanistan-troop-withdrawal/index.html

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/08/donald-trump-joe-biden-afghanistan

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-pledges-withdraw-troops-afghanistan-christmas-taliban-cheer-n1242590

 

https://eu.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/2021/03/17/us-troop-withdrawal-afghanistan-trumps-deadline-weighs-biden/4667248001/

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doha_Agreement_(2020)

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Guided Missile said:

Since when has a "reasonable guess" been a "wild stab in the dark"? What isn't a "wild stab in the dark" is that Putin invaded Ukraine during Biden's presidency, just after his surrender to the Taliban. Still, you stick with your socialist agenda, one that Putin has permanently killed, along with net zero carbon, appeasement and all the rest of the woke bollox. 

Great to see the clueless lefties squirm, while their third rate class warriors are destroyed with most of Ukraine. Thankfully, Blair is one of the latest, following on from Corbyn, et al.

I take it that you have never read Orwell? Boy did he nail people like you and the people your like enable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

11 July 2018
Trump tells Nato chief that Germany is "totally controlled by Russia"
US President Donald Trump has clashed with German Chancellor Angela Merkel over Russian influence and defence spending, ahead of a Nato summit.
Mr Trump said Germany was "totally controlled by Russia" because of the high level of natural gas it imported, and this was a "bad thing for Nato".
Mrs Merkel hit back, comparing German independence now with the time when she grew up in the former East Germany.
"I want to say that I have experience of when a part of Germany was controlled by the Soviet Union," she told reporters.
"I am very happy that today we are united in freedom as the Federal Republic of Germany. Because of that we can say that we can make our independent policies and make independent decisions. "That is very good, especially for people in eastern Germany." She also defended her country's contribution to the Western alliance.

Quote

Many countries in NATO, which we are expected to defend, are not only short of their current commitment of 2% (which is low), but are also delinquent for many years in payments that have not been made. Will they reimburse the U.S.?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 10, 2018

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, benjii said:

Trump was a Russian asset, FFS. They even had him trying to extort Ukraine a couple of years ago.

Using the word asset and Trump in the same sentence seems wrong.

Edited by moonraker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when I think this piece of human shit can't sink any lower he always manages to surprise me. I'm also surprised that the sniveling turd Hannity dared risk his dear leader's wrath with this line of questioning.

Edited by cloggy saint
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})