Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint said:

And from Everton previously being the only ones on the scene, now we've got Palace interested (and Spurs possibly?).......

Spurs will offer half what Everton did knowing their shananigans lol

  • Like 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

Spurs will try to throw players in as part-ex, they always do.

We don't want your next gen Tommy Forecast thanks.

That was a masterstroke from Levy at the time 

😂

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ErwinK1961 said:

Spurs are not a credible option, they will never pay the money we want.

they stumped up 40m for Archie Gray in similar circumstances.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Turkish said:

they stumped up 40m for Archie Gray in similar circumstances.

Well exactly, and that was without him playing a minute in the Prem. £50m completely reasonable expectation, so spuds probably offered £25m as usual.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SWLondon Saint said:

Well exactly, and that was without him playing a minute in the Prem. £50m completely reasonable expectation, so spuds probably offered £25m as usual.

Lets be honest, Dibbling didn't set the world alight last season. 

if we want 50m for fernandes, dibbling isn't anywhere near worth that. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Dman said:

Lets be honest, Dibbling didn't set the world alight last season. 

if we want 50m for fernandes, dibbling isn't anywhere near worth that. 

- RWs are in high demand

- He’s english AND U21

- Super highly rated at youth level

- He was fine last year, i  a squad that struggled

I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said:

- RWs are in high demand

- He’s english AND U21

- Super highly rated at youth level

- He was fine last year, i  a squad that struggled

I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable 

 

Yeah, 40-50m is the knock-down, you've been relegated price.

If we were in the Prem he'd command 70m+.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said:

- RWs are in high demand

- He’s english AND U21

- Super highly rated at youth level

- He was fine last year, i  a squad that struggled

I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable 

 

Whatever happened to the word 'very'?

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Start the bids at £40 mil if they want to throw in a loan in two the other way which could allow Still to implement system fair does. 

Edited by ally_uk
Posted
21 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said:

- RWs are in high demand

- He’s english AND U21

- Super highly rated at youth level

- He was fine last year, i  a squad that struggled

I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable 

 

1 year left on his contract also accounts for a lot. 

You're paying for potential and nothing more at this stage. He had 6 good months and went off the boil for the other 6 last season and his g/a return was poor (probably becasue of the side he played in). 

For all his quality atributes, he's very, very one-footed and imo, pretty lazy. 

Personally, £40m+ is a very good deal for us. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, Dman said:

1 year left on his contract also accounts for a lot. 

You're paying for potential and nothing more at this stage. He had 6 good months and went off the boil for the other 6 last season and his g/a return was poor (probably becasue of the side he played in). 

For all his quality atributes, he's very, very one-footed and imo, pretty lazy. 

Personally, £40m+ is a very good deal for us. 

He has two.

  • Like 1
Posted

Going to Spurs perceived as the fallback option for a target they lost to Arsenal... that wouldn't be the easiest environment for a young player to develop, or to win over their fans.

Just based on what the consensus is at youth levels on what he could end up being for England, I hope he ends up in a team where he's given every chance to reach that (hopefully us!)

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Smirking_Saint said:

They’ve put in a bid apparently 

 

Not trying to be an MLG style pedant but making an approach doesn't necessarily mean they've put in a bid. 

Could mean they've just contacted the club to register interest and find out what the asking price is etc, in order to weigh up whether they want to make an official bid. 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said:

Really getting confused with this now, do we have a deal ? Don’t we have a deal ?

Have they moved the goalposts ?

Are we just trying to get the deal done ?

Being discussed in detail in that actual thread 😀

Posted

I think that it’s not impossible the Krasnodar President may expect a brown envelope from Saints as part of the deal - and we apparently don’t do brown envelopes in the Club Shop. That might explain why agreement is at an impasse even though transfer fee and wages seem agreed or agreeable. This nonsense about not wanting a player to player championship level is 100% bollocks. Show him enough money and he’d sell him to the National League. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SouSaint said:

Echo saying Saints stood firm on valuation but the Everton journalists are saying that we reduced our asking price significantly. 

Sounds like every transfer, ever

Posted
3 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

£42m fixed fee, with £6m add-ons. 20% sell on.

So pretty much what we wanted all in.

Wonder if Mr Levy is counting his cash with a view to an offer...

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

Who has said upto £48m?

Athletic say just over £40m

 

There's all sorts on twitter, impossible to know what to believe really. I saw something which said £42m fixed fee, with £6m achievable add ons + 20% sell on.

There's obviously agendas at play, Everton journos wanting to say they got him for much much less, and our side making us want to believe we stood our ground. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.

Edited by S-Clarke
Posted
3 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Goodbye…

Lets move on

Exactly.

I don't believe this is the best move for him, but he and his agent have made their bed now they have to lie in it. Shame he didn't stay long enough to become the player we expected and hoped he might be. Perhaps now he never will.

Posted
1 minute ago, Saint Matty 76 said:

Nah looks like Sky are actually saying £36m with £6m in easily achievable add-ons, alongside the 20% sell-on.

Seems most parties are aligned with a £42m total package.

That's where the benefit might be rather than add-ons.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Saint Matty 76 said:

Sky apparently saying £42m+6m on SSN.

 

3 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

There's all sorts on twitter, impossible to know what to believe really. I saw something which said £42m fixed fee, with £6m achievable add ons + 20% sell on.

There's obviously agendas at play, Everton journos wanting to say they got him for much much less, and our side making us want to believe we stood our ground. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.

Sky say it is a "£42m package" and "including £6m of easily achievable add ons and a 20% sell on".

Sounds more like it is £36m plus £6m. Rather than £42m plus £6m.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...