S-Clarke Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago If he's going, a bidding war is the best outcome for us.
OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 hours ago, S-Clarke said: If he's going, a bidding war is the best outcome for us. And from Everton previously being the only ones on the scene, now we've got Palace interested (and Spurs possibly?).......
OldNick Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint said: And from Everton previously being the only ones on the scene, now we've got Palace interested (and Spurs possibly?)....... Spurs will offer half what Everton did knowing their shananigans lol 3
S-Clarke Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Spurs will try to throw players in as part-ex, they always do. We don't want your next gen Tommy Forecast thanks.
AlexLaw76 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, S-Clarke said: Spurs will try to throw players in as part-ex, they always do. We don't want your next gen Tommy Forecast thanks. That was a masterstroke from Levy at the time 😂
ErwinK1961 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Spurs are not a credible option, they will never pay the money we want.
Turkish Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, ErwinK1961 said: Spurs are not a credible option, they will never pay the money we want. they stumped up 40m for Archie Gray in similar circumstances. 1
Smirking_Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Turkish said: they stumped up 40m for Archie Gray in similar circumstances. They’ve put in a bid apparently
SWLondon Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 23 minutes ago, Turkish said: they stumped up 40m for Archie Gray in similar circumstances. Well exactly, and that was without him playing a minute in the Prem. £50m completely reasonable expectation, so spuds probably offered £25m as usual.
Dman Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, SWLondon Saint said: Well exactly, and that was without him playing a minute in the Prem. £50m completely reasonable expectation, so spuds probably offered £25m as usual. Lets be honest, Dibbling didn't set the world alight last season. if we want 50m for fernandes, dibbling isn't anywhere near worth that. 1
Smirking_Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Dman said: Lets be honest, Dibbling didn't set the world alight last season. if we want 50m for fernandes, dibbling isn't anywhere near worth that. - RWs are in high demand - He’s english AND U21 - Super highly rated at youth level - He was fine last year, i a squad that struggled I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable 1
benjii Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said: - RWs are in high demand - He’s english AND U21 - Super highly rated at youth level - He was fine last year, i a squad that struggled I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable Yeah, 40-50m is the knock-down, you've been relegated price. If we were in the Prem he'd command 70m+. 1
iansums Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said: - RWs are in high demand - He’s english AND U21 - Super highly rated at youth level - He was fine last year, i a squad that struggled I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable Whatever happened to the word 'very'? 1
ally_uk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Start the bids at £40 mil if they want to throw in a loan in two the other way which could allow Still to implement system fair does. Edited 1 hour ago by ally_uk
Dman Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 21 minutes ago, Smirking_Saint said: - RWs are in high demand - He’s english AND U21 - Super highly rated at youth level - He was fine last year, i a squad that struggled I think 40-50m is comfortably reasonable 1 year left on his contract also accounts for a lot. You're paying for potential and nothing more at this stage. He had 6 good months and went off the boil for the other 6 last season and his g/a return was poor (probably becasue of the side he played in). For all his quality atributes, he's very, very one-footed and imo, pretty lazy. Personally, £40m+ is a very good deal for us. 1
ErwinK1961 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Dman said: 1 year left on his contract also accounts for a lot. You're paying for potential and nothing more at this stage. He had 6 good months and went off the boil for the other 6 last season and his g/a return was poor (probably becasue of the side he played in). For all his quality atributes, he's very, very one-footed and imo, pretty lazy. Personally, £40m+ is a very good deal for us. He has two.
Sheaf Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 19 minutes ago, iansums said: Whatever happened to the word 'very'? It's been superseded.
Matthew Le God Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, Dman said: 1 year left on his contract also accounts for a lot. Contract expires in 2027
Jimmy_D Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Going to Spurs perceived as the fallback option for a target they lost to Arsenal... that wouldn't be the easiest environment for a young player to develop, or to win over their fans. Just based on what the consensus is at youth levels on what he could end up being for England, I hope he ends up in a team where he's given every chance to reach that (hopefully us!)
iansums Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said: It's been superseded. Thanks for reaching out.
Midfield_General Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Smirking_Saint said: They’ve put in a bid apparently Not trying to be an MLG style pedant but making an approach doesn't necessarily mean they've put in a bid. Could mean they've just contacted the club to register interest and find out what the asking price is etc, in order to weigh up whether they want to make an official bid. 1
Dman Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago 1 hour ago, ErwinK1961 said: He has two. I'll shut up then
Smirking_Saint Posted 6 minutes ago Posted 6 minutes ago Really getting confused with this now, do we have a deal ? Don’t we have a deal ? Have they moved the goalposts ? Are we just trying to get the deal done ?
ErwinK1961 Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago 11 minutes ago, Dman said: I'll shut up then I think the second year is an option that we can chose to implement tbf.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now