Jump to content

Saints 1-2 Hull - Match Thread

Lighthouse

By Lighthouse
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mattio

Mattio

Posted
Posted
Just now, Greedyfly said:

Just 10 other positions to sort out now....

 

No, sorry, 11. Manager.

Don’t forget however many come with SR

  • Like 1
sockeye

sockeye

Posted
Posted

That ‘miss’ shows the mentality of these losers clearly: someone else will do it, I’ll just pass, I have no agency

  • Like 5
RedArmy

RedArmy

Posted
Posted
Just now, sockeye said:

That ‘miss’ shows the mentality of these losers clearly: someone else will do it, I’ll just pass, I have no agency

Yeah pretty pathetic from Azaz. 
 

He had the best opportunity and passed it to Jander ffs 

Baz Fl

Baz Fl

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, bugenhagen said:

This is not directed at you spesifically, but I love all the different reasoning from people trying to justify 5 at the back:

First we were told we could not play a back four due to all our right backs were out injured.
Then it is because we have no suitable left back...
No, now it's becuase we have poor CB's

I think we do have poor center backs and the number of goals we concede from crosses worries me, hopefully new GK will help us out in that dep 🤞

  • Like 1
SaintsRoyalty

SaintsRoyalty

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, NewYorkSaint said:

 

Remind me what our formation was when we blew away every team in the first half on four different occasions?   Oh... that's right... five at the back.          It's weird that once the fan-base gets locked into a single explanation for our woes, any appeal to actual evidence goes out the window.   The first 20 comments on X on the team announcement are all winging about that one thing. As opposed to saying... this is about the best line-up we can field right now.     To me the main thing that's needed is a real commitment to moving the ball fast, even if that sometimes goes wrong.   When it goes right, confidence builds and we become unstoppable.  I think it's 50/50 that we return today to a thrilling first half and a minimum of two goals.

And how do you move the ball fast if more than half the team are defenders and are inclined to stay in our half? If you play with an extra CB then your attack is going to be less affective but you should be tighter at the back. It’s why small teams park the bus when the play a big team.

Are you seriously questioning why fans of one of the biggest clubs in the league who have more expensive clubs than most opponent’s whole squads are annoyed that we play a defensive formation at home?

And as I write our defensive focused team makes another screw up that leads to a goal!

  • Like 2
bpsaint

bpsaint

Posted
Posted

Fucking manning you shit cunt. Honestly cannot stand that little rat, hope he gets injured so I don’t have to watch him play for us anymore.

  • Like 1
coalman

coalman

Posted
Posted

Manning doing Manning things.

At least the post match interview writes itself. "I thought it was two games. We were on top until they scored. We just need a bit of luck"

Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saint Fan CaM said:

And there we go. Utterly shite management to allow that goal to happen. And guess what side…Manning nowhere to be seen.

It was Manning that played the through ball.

  • Like 1
tdmickey3

tdmickey3

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Just got in, how is it?

Ignore this just heard it’s another defensive masterclass.

And no surprise it’s manning 

Joke player, joke system, joke of a coach all overseen by a club run like a joke

Edited by tdmickey3
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted

As per, the opposition are man-marking our midfield....

hence we are (again) passing around in our defensive 3rd.

The manager is soooo out of his depth

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...