Jump to content

New Manager Debate

SambaMaverick

By SambaMaverick
in The Saints

 Share

Still In or Out?  

232 members have voted

  1. 1. Still In or Out?

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

skintsaint

skintsaint

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Pilchards said:

Brendan Rodgers 🤣
 

If he has thrown his hat in the ring then we should be on it. Best of the bunch and believe he got Swansea out of this league and stayed up following season.

image.png.e77ff60102f6e9b9bd78930e2b58e391.png

  • Like 2
Saint Scott

Saint Scott

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Pilchards said:

In the final 4 and he’s impressed the board.

Had no idea he lives in this area.

favourite is current manager as he really wants the job.

 

Thanks

Rogers would be a coup given our current predicament. If he's interested why would Tonda be the favourite among the board? Baffling

Miltonaggro

Miltonaggro

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

BREAKING: I’ve had it on good authority that a figure has been seen leaving alongside Johannes Spors and Rasmus Ankersen from a London restaurant on Thursday.

Sources say he was wearing a bow tie and had yellow dots all over his clothes.

They interviewed Mr Tumble but he wanted too much money and refused to play with three centre backs. Also a bit of a nasty cunt!

  • Haha 3
Midfield_General

Midfield_General

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CB Fry said:

Worked with Spors and Tonda at Gerona, that's all.

Sacked too recently for it to be a viable option. It is not going to happen but nice distraction.

I think Spors actually hired him for Genoa to be fair. So he must rate him and have a relationship with him. 

I agree that it’s probably a bit soon and a bit too far-fetched, but maybe not entirely out of the question and he’s probably about as good an option as we could realistically hope for. 

I think he’d be a great hire, personally. 

  • Like 1
washsaint

washsaint

Posted
Posted

Rodgers is a t**T and he ended up faling at Leicester and Celtic as his ego got in the way.

Wouldn't want him within a mile of the club.

O'Neill - no thanks.  Skate through and through.  Look at what happened with Redknapp.

Carrick - not averse 

Eckhert - I think he has something about him and just have a feeling he could be an inspired choice.  Similar to Rohl in a way and no-one would have been too disappointed with him.

Put it this way, if Eckhert  wins today from 2 games he'll be the joint 2nd best manager we've had in the SR era.  How mental is that?

  • Confused 2
LGTL

LGTL

Posted
Posted

Wow. If Rodgers is in the mix then he simple has to get the job. It’s a complete no brainer. 

  • Like 11
trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

If he has thrown his hat in the ring then we should be on it. Best of the bunch and believe he got Swansea out of this league and stayed up following season.

image.png.e77ff60102f6e9b9bd78930e2b58e391.png

Yep, pretty much a 'non brainer' if Rodgers is definitely interested. We need a big personality / strong character as manager and he ticks the box.

Dear Mssrs Spors & Solak,

Ignore my plea for Viera earlier... Rodgers is your man. 

Yours etc...

 

Edited by trousers
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
tdmickey3

tdmickey3

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, goodymatt said:

So the final four are assumed to be:

Eckhert

O’Neil

Carrick

Rodgers

Why on earth would you go with Eckhert from that list?

Ankerson will make his choice soon…. So it will be Eckhert

tdmickey3

tdmickey3

Posted
Posted
Just now, AlexLaw76 said:

Just how on gods earth is this Ekhart even a remote possibility?

Just why?

Because of SR led my the master of everything football…….Ankerson 

  • Like 1
Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, washsaint said:

Rodgers is a t**T and he ended up faling at Leicester and Celtic as his ego got in the way.

Wouldn't want him within a mile of the club.

O'Neill - no thanks.  Skate through and through.  Look at what happened with Redknapp.

Carrick - not averse 

Eckhert - I think he has something about him and just have a feeling he could be an inspired choice.  Similar to Rohl in a way and no-one would have been too disappointed with him.

Put it this way, if Eckhert  wins today from 2 games he'll be the joint 2nd best manager we've had in the SR era.  How mental is that?

Genuine question - what exactly do you see in him to make you think that?

Have you seen the line-up he has chosen for today's game at home to the bottom team in the league? 

We need someone who will definitely be a big improvement on Still, not yet another pet SR project who shows promise and might make go on to be a good manager at some point. We might have won at QPR but we played just as badly as we have at any point this season, and I see nothing to suggest today's game is going to be any different.

  • Like 4
Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Just how on gods earth is this Ekhart even a remote possibility?

Just why?

Because Rasmus cunt-face fucking prick Ankerson thinks it's a good idea.

Honestly, just seeing a picture of that smug cunt's face and knowing that he ever had any fucking thing to do with this club just makes my fucking blood boil.

  • Like 1
Saint Gifford

Saint Gifford

Posted
Posted

I’d have given Still more time, he will seriously walk into a top job. 

Koeman type no thank you, inherited a team not for me.

Frank absolutely, won’t happen, other Frank absolutely not. 

Internally no, from lower leagues no.

Hate to say it but Southgate to steady the ship instil discipline, Ralph 💯 %, Farq’s yes. Jose pipe dream. 

Should have gone for Warnock 5 or 6 managers ago, not now obviously. I’d even take the nutter Barton with his connections, but that ship has sailed now he is doing his “”Podcast””???

Roy Keane yes, Rooney no

But to be honest as a lot have said, who will come now apart from those looking for a payday.

  • Haha 3
ErwinK1961

ErwinK1961

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Because Rasmus cunt-face fucking prick Ankerson thinks it's a good idea.

Honestly, just seeing a picture of that smug cunt's face and knowing that he ever had any fucking thing to do with this club just makes my fucking blood boil.

Why is it Rasmus, and not Spors who worked with Eckhart previously at Genoa?

If he gets the job then it’s 100% Spors led.

Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, sockeye said:

Norwich

Middlesbrough would be a better option for him. (Although hoping they go for GON). 

for_heaven's_Saint

for_heaven's_Saint

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Saint Gifford said:

I’d have given Still more time, he will seriously walk into a top job. 

Koeman type no thank you, inherited a team not for me.

Frank absolutely, won’t happen, other Frank absolutely not. 

Internally no, from lower leagues no.

Hate to say it but Southgate to steady the ship instil discipline, Ralph 💯 %, Farq’s yes. Jose pipe dream. 

Should have gone for Warnock 5 or 6 managers ago, not now obviously. I’d even take the nutter Barton with his connections, but that ship has sailed now he is doing his “”Podcast””???

Roy Keane yes, Rooney no

But to be honest as a lot have said, who will come now apart from those looking for a payday.

Jesus wept. So you’d have kept Still and would take Barton or Keane? Thank fuck you’re not making the decisions. 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, washsaint said:

Rodgers is a t**T and he ended up faling at Leicester and Celtic as his ego got in the way.

Wouldn't want him within a mile of the club.

O'Neill - no thanks.  Skate through and through.  Look at what happened with Redknapp.

Carrick - not averse 

Eckhert - I think he has something about him and just have a feeling he could be an inspired choice.  Similar to Rohl in a way and no-one would have been too disappointed with him.

Put it this way, if Eckhert  wins today from 2 games he'll be the joint 2nd best manager we've had in the SR era.  How mental is that?

I know what you mean about Eckert but I still feel it is too early in his career for this job. He also needs to ‘find his feet’ by himself, and not be steamrollered into a style or selections to suit Rasmus.

For the above reason I can’t see Brendan Rodgers being brought in as he wouldn’t conform to suit skinny jeans fucking hipsters and their spreadsheet game.  Say what you want about Rodgers - and he comes across as a smug twat - but he probably does know his way round the football world. 

  • Like 2
Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ErwinK1961 said:

Why is it Rasmus, and not Spors who worked with Eckhart previously at Genoa?

If he gets the job then it’s 100% Spors led.

Spors won't have the final say in the matter though. 

  • Like 1
Miltonaggro

Miltonaggro

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, trousers said:

Yep, pretty much a 'non brainer' if Rodgers is definitely interested. We need a big personality / strong character as manager and he ticks the box.

Dear Mssrs Spors & Solak,

Ignore my plea for Viera earlier... Rodgers is your man. 

Yours etc...

 

Bloody fickle 😂

  • Haha 3
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, washsaint said:

.

Put it this way, if Eckhert  wins today from 2 games he'll be the joint 2nd best manager we've had in the SR era.  How mental is that?

Ekhart is the type of appointing you make in Sheffield Wednesday's position 

It would signal SR have given up entirely by appointing him. It would be fucking comically unbelievable.

Edited by AlexLaw76
  • Like 1
Dr Who?

Dr Who?

Posted
Posted

My Reading supporting friends could not stand Rogers. I think it is the only club he has been crap at. Then he went to Swansea and did a great job. 

sfc4prem

sfc4prem

Posted
Posted

From reading posts I get a feeling that many posts are, perhaps without realising it, genuinely advising Sport Republic to hire the manager they are suggesting.

We've lost trust in the bunch of fucking jokers to such an extent that we're desperately hoping they read our fucking posts and it gives them ideas that they hadn't considered 😂

  • Haha 1
SW11_Saint

SW11_Saint

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Just how on gods earth is this Ekhart even a remote possibility?

Just why?

Because ‘Sports Republic’…

If they’re so desperate to develop him, just insist he’s in the coaching set-up for whoever takes over. Is that beyond them?

LGTL

LGTL

Posted
Posted

What the fuck are we waiting for. Jesus if Rodgers wants it we should be all out for him. 

  • Like 1
Harry_SFC

Harry_SFC

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Ekhart is the type of appointing you make in Sheffield Wednesday's position 

It would signal SR have given up entirely by appointing him. It would be fucking comically unbelievable.

It would be a terrible, terrible gamble. We should be beating this Sheffield Wednesday regardless of who is in charge. Even if he wins this it means fuck all in my eyes. 

  • Like 1
AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
Just now, Harry_SFC said:

It would be a terrible, terrible gamble. We should be beating this Sheffield Wednesday regardless of who is in charge. Even if he wins this it means fuck all in my eyes. 

Agree. Yet we will have melons chattering about how he has 2 in 2 and deserves/should get the job

DT

DT

Posted
Posted

I really hope the twat Rasmus isn't pointing his little fingers at Brentford again, saying, look, it CAN work to employ the guy that's been there already.

Really think he is the prime, root cause of all of our bad decisions over the last years.

Eckhert would be a bad move. The players are too billy big bollocks (we should sell all of the troublemakers in January) to 'allow' anyone but their friend Russell or somebody who can command respect immediately (Rodgers would do that, O'Neill less so) rather than the stand-in teacher.

  • Like 1
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Pilchards said:

Brendan Rodgers 🤣
 

Well if Pilchards has seen Brendan at Staplewood from up his tree, then that’s good enough for me. 
 

(Plus he broke the story of the Nathan Jones link well ahead of it happening)

  • Like 1
Dr Who?

Dr Who?

Posted
Posted

I love the fact that all that is posted on here is pretty much speculation, well 99%. We have no idea what is going on, and I would say at this stage no one who is betting do as well, apart from snippets that are put out there by media sources. 

Fun though! More fun than our game thread will be. 

trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted (edited)

Surely Rodgers has got to be lowest risk option for Sport Republic? Even if he fails they can always turn around and say to us fans: "well, you wanted a high profile manager rather than one of our usual project / experimental managers and look where it's got us...". 

If they go for another of their 'clever' options then it's high risk and all on them (yet again)...

Edited by trousers
Saint NL

Saint NL

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pilchards said:

Oh dear GON is in one of the boxes so it’s clear he is one of the 4.

We're going to need a stealthy photo

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...