Turkish Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Kicking off at the end, love to see it! 2 points dropped. Paid for that poor first half 3
Lighthouse Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Fair play, that’s a decent point and you can’t fault our second half effort. I was going to credit Lampard for having them well organised with ten men but he’s now acting like a classless helmet after F.T. 12
Micky Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Early Xmas present from Coventry who are more than a level above us. I was pleased to get a point in the end.
Saint_clark Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 40 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: I actually think in terms of taking advantage of them being stretched, Robinson would be a better option. Not sure what Redarmy thought was so funny about this. Was obvious Fellows, despite his quality, wouldn't make a difference because of the way both teams were set up, and lo and behold...
Sheaf Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Hmmmm. We're still only capable of winning, or even scoring, when the other team plays right into our hands and falls for our pressing traps then. 3
tdmickey3 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Lee On Solent Saint said: Didn't do nearly enough in that second half Yep an absolutely pathetic effort in 2nd half for a different reason this time but TE is tactically lacking. Keeping 3 cetre backs on against 10 men. so so disappointing again 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago They were the better side with 11. not having Tonda I’m afraid. One way of playing it seems and teams have sussed it out 4 1
Crab Lungs Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) Cannot fault the players effort in the back end of the 2nd half. Really well done. Contrary to some no doubt. i like Lampard, but that’s proper small time behaviour… bellend Edited 8 hours ago by Crab Lungs 2
leeham_69 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Pretty familiar pattern for me - can't break down teams, resort to pumping it into the box to no one or shooting hopefully from range. The biggest frustration for me is how much of our attacking play goes through our centre backs - THB admirably presents for the ball and tries to carry forwards but really that should be Flynn Downes' job, he is such a handdbrake on everything. No quality on the ball whatsoever. I really want my CMs to be having 50% of the touches that our CBs are having on days like today. I honestly think he should rebrand as a CB - he spends most of the game there anyway. Honorable mentions to Manning who is garbage and Archer who I don't remember touching the ball. Prob would have taken a point but it is a very frustrating feeling. 5
obelisk Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Passing it slowly between the back three when up against 10 men is not what is required. Coventry defended well 2nd half whereas Saints in similar circumstances would have folded. 4
tdmickey3 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Sheaf Saint said: Hmmmm. We're still only capable of winning, or even scoring, when the other team plays right into our hands and falls for our pressing traps then. 1 trick pony management 1
tdmickey3 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Crab Lungs said: Cannot fault the players effort in the 2nd half. Really well done. i like Lampard, but that’s proper small time behaviour… bellend It was all huff and puff
Raging Bull Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Any videos of the FT handbags??? What was the hunchback upset about?
Saint NL Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Can't help but love Scienza. Best player on the pitch, he played peacemaker with Lampard at the end, and just saw a shot of him giving some kid his shirt to make his day. What a man. 11
Crab Lungs Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, tdmickey3 said: It was all huff and puff It wasn’t scintillating but imo could see they were having a pop - which I like. Annoying we couldn’t put it to bed though, especially after Lampards behaviour
Patches O Houlihan Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Baird of the land said: The lack of a big target man really hampered us there. Only real threat was coming from scienza. Maybe that's why we "played a back 5" second half - actually it was Wood and Quashie at the back - THB played midfield and got into the box for crosses. Remember we are a team of midgets. We cannot afford to take off our tall, solid good headers of the ball when we know they will be packing their box to defend and every shot from a twinkle toes will have to go through a mass of bodies. 4
Jimmy_D Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Coventry managed to hang on for a point with absolute ****house tactics but at least we stopped the worthless ****s stealing all three. 2
Saint_clark Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Raging Bull said: Any videos of the FT handbags??? What was the hunchback upset about? My stream died, hopefully there's footage of it somewhere I love a bit of argie bargie at the football.
Streaky Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Micky said: Early Xmas present from Coventry who are more than a level above us. I was pleased to get a point in the end. Didn't see that at all but you are entitled to your opinion. 1
obelisk Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I'll be happy with that point just as long as Saints come back from Oxford with three. 1
Suhari Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) Fucking hell. Nathan Wood is an intelligent sounding young man. Edited 6 hours ago by Suhari 3
Big M Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Saint NL said: Welington getting stuck in at the end 😂 Brazilian, all a bit short tempered. 🤣
LGTL Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Would we have got a point in similar circumstances? Course we fucking wouldn’t have. Easy to be tough after the game. 1
notnowcato Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: Not sure what Redarmy thought was so funny about this. Was obvious Fellows, despite his quality, wouldn't make a difference because of the way both teams were set up, and lo and behold... Yeah apart from 2 quality crosses sticking it where at least one of the strikers should’ve been. It was the most obvious change from our bench.
Saint NL Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Suhari said: Fucking hell. Nathan Wood is an intelligent sounding you man. It's hard to watch, Christ, someone should take him off media duties
Monk Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Micky said: Early Xmas present from Coventry who are more than a level above us. I was pleased to get a point in the end. I beg your pardon.
disconnect Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Suhari said: Fucking hell. Nathan Wood is an intelligent sounding you man. Makes Stephens seem like Einstein. He'd be good on a night out with Matty Targett 🤣 1
notnowcato Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago What the fuck was Lampard’s issue at the end. What a bell.
Saint_clark Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, notnowcato said: Yeah apart from 2 quality crosses sticking it where at least one of the strikers should’ve been. It was the most obvious change from our bench. But where strikers weren't because we don't have attackers who score regularly from crosses. Robinson has the close control that would challenge their defenders one on one in the box and in front of goal. They were more than happy defending against us out wide over and over.
Lighthouse Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Raging Bull said: Any videos of the FT handbags??? What was the hunchback upset about? Looked like he was shouting ‘f**k off’ at the Northam and fist bumping towards them. THB the gave him a few words, then Lamps got his handbag out. Wely clearly took exception to something and came in for a bit of a go. All a bit silly, I guess the tension just spilled over a bit.
notnowcato Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago From 80 onwards either wood or THB should’ve been upfront. Cov were more than happy for us to sling it in to our midgets. 2
Toadhall Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Lighthouse said: Looked like he was shouting ‘f**k off’ at the Northam and fist bumping towards them. THB be gave him a few words, then Lamps got his handbag out. Wely clearly took exception to something and came in for a bit of a go. All a bit silly, I guess the tension just spilled over a bit. All very very much handbags.
notnowcato Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: But where strikers weren't because we don't have attackers who score regularly from crosses. Robinson has the close control that would challenge their defenders one on one in the box and in front of goal. They were more than happy defending against us out wide over and over. So you’re saying Fellows should never play then given our strikers. Have a day off fella.
Edmonton Saint Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago I do hope Stewart is back soon. I feel he could thrive under this system if he stays fit. 3
austsaint Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: Fair play, that’s a decent point and you can’t fault our second half effort. I was going to credit Lampard for having them well organised with ten men but he’s now acting like a classless helmet after F.T. Lampard seemed to be singling out THB, what a prize wanker. Completely battered them second half. Yes they sat deeper being a man short but there was a different attitude from Saints, more urgency. It was an enthralling second half. Scienza once again magnificent, THB and Quarshie were both excellent, and it’s hard to see how he can drop Quarshie on that performance. Wood was better, Manning improved second half, and needed to. Armstrong busy all day. Two points dropped. Hard to believe Coventry are so far ahead of the pack judged on today. 4
Turkish Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 11 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: They were the better side with 11. not having Tonda I’m afraid. One way of playing it seems and teams have sussed it out We set up all wrong, Monk said it, showed them too much respect. It was a bit gutless. However we did have two very good chances and should have been at least level half time. 3
Sheaf Saint Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Viking Saint said: Wood sounds as thick as mince TBF he looks it as well.
Turkish Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: Looked like he was shouting ‘f**k off’ at the Northam and fist bumping towards them. THB the gave him a few words, then Lamps got his handbag out. Wely clearly took exception to something and came in for a bit of a go. All a bit silly, I guess the tension just spilled over a bit. Good on him, love to see a bit of that, stop being so precious. 1
madge Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Even against 10 men Tonda is too scared to move away from his 3 central defenders. He’s really not the answer and total lack of tactical awareness showed.any true ambition and we win that match. 4
LGTL Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Incredible that we ended that game with 3 CB’s on the pitch, and yet we were sending fucking Bazunu up for a corner. Want to win it that much? Take a fucking defender off. All 3 were spectators second half. 4
Turkish Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Just now, LGTL said: Incredible that we ended that game with 3 CB’s on the pitch, and yet we were sending fucking Bazunu up for a corner. Want to win it that much? Take a fucking defender off. All 3 were spectators second half. It was unreal really. They had one up front, 5 at the back and barely got into our half second half. 1
RedArmy Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Just now, LGTL said: Incredible that we ended that game with 3 CB’s on the pitch, and yet we were sending fucking Bazunu up for a corner. Want to win it that much? Take a fucking defender off. All 3 were spectators second half. Sending him up for a short corner too couldn’t fucking make it up. 1
saintant Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Another generally poor performance and only the sending off allowed us a point because Coventry would likely have won otherwise. We are almost a good side and I think something is missing - possibly we need to play a back four but don't have two good enough full backs. Also we badly need a big number nine whether starting or to bring on and mix the game up. Still, a point is the most I was expecting and thought we'd probably lose so onwards to Oxford.
Sheaf Saint Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, LGTL said: Incredible that we ended that game with 3 CB’s on the pitch, and yet we were sending fucking Bazunu up for a corner. Want to win it that much? Take a fucking defender off. All 3 were spectators second half. That's not what I saw. THB was pushed right up and involved in a lot of our build up play from a midfield position. 2
hypochondriac Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago We were alright. Shame we couldn't get the win but that happens sometimes when the other team has to shut up shop. Overall a good point and keeps us in the playoff hunt. 1
RedArmy Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 subs. We made 2 fucking subs when chasing a winner against 10 men. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now