AlexLaw76 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Given how the world works, I assume we will be reinstated to a FA Cup final. 4
The Kraken Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 12 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Given how the world works, I assume we will be reinstated to a FA Cup final. Given how none of the charges relate to last season, I assume we won’t.
Sarnia Cherie Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Given how the world works, I assume we will be reinstated to a FA Cup final. BBC News said clubs will be looking into some form of recompense now and why not us?
do i not like fizzy pop Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Steady on all, 114 guilty counts of serious financial breaches pale in to insignificance compared to sending a lad with an iPhone to watch a training session. 5
Baird of the land Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago After the Chelsea incident Waiting for the joke punishment.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Guilty of 114 charges?! What did Parsons confess to?! Oh, City... 1
UpweySaint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 24 minutes ago, The Kraken said: Given how none of the charges relate to last season, I assume we won’t. Technically true and it’s never going to happen but surely if you cheat financial rules in previous seasons you still benefit from it for a number of reasons for years to come? If City don’t win their appeal I’m curious to see just how hard they get hit. 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 20 minutes ago, The Kraken said: Given how none of the charges relate to last season, I assume we won’t. I am being flippant, (which I am sure you knew), but is there a right-hand marker for any remuneration/remedies to their shortcomings? Their charges go up to 2023 (in some cases), does that mean they can never ever get the suggested "Asterix" next to their 2024 premier league title? Quote In relation to Manchester City, the Premier League's current rules expressly preserve its ability to initiate or continue enforcement action concerning PSR breaches for seasons ending 2025/26 and earlier, even though PSRs have been replaced by the new SCR system from 2026/27. I am guessing not judging by your comment.
tdmickey3 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, UpweySaint said: Technically true and it’s never going to happen but surely if you cheat financial rules in previous seasons you still benefit from it for a number of reasons for years to come? If City don’t win their appeal I’m curious to see just how hard they get hit. 1
coalman Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago The only crime they're guilty of is caring too much about football.
beatlesaint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Baird of the land said: After the Chelsea incident Waiting for the joke punishment. £500 and they have to buy the cakes for every Prem League meeting for a whole year
Turkish Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, coalman said: The only crime they're guilty of is caring too much about football. Agreed. These charges should be ignored given the enjoyment we’ve all got from seeing them bring such amazing players to the premier league, the worlds greatest manager and entertaining us all with amazing football. Football is an entertainment industry and no one can argue they haven’t done that. So they broke a few rules? Small price to pay for what they’re done for the premier league brand globally and that’s all that matters
The Kraken Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) What should happen is that they get a Rangers style punishment and sent down to League 2. Some of the charges are awful, it’s way beyond overspending, it’s a huge deception, corruption and then cover up of finances from Man City. What will actually likely happen will be a massive dilution and Everton’s punishment will stay as being more severe. Much like Chelsea just got a slap on the wrist, but on a much bigger scale. Edited 4 hours ago by The Kraken 4
die Mannyschaft Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Is getting -10 points for going into administration similar to these financial 115 breaches ? Or are City in a totally different financial situation? So its just the Everton and Derby cases that are comparable?
sfc4prem Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 13 minutes ago, trousers said: Has spoken a lot of sense in the last year, this man. 7
Turkish Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 23 minutes ago, The Kraken said: What should happen is that they get a Rangers style punishment and sent down to League 2. Some of the charges are awful, it’s way beyond overspending, it’s a huge deception, corruption and then cover up of finances from Man City. What will actually likely happen will be a massive dilution and Everton’s punishment will stay as being more severe. Much like Chelsea just got a slap on the wrist, but on a much bigger scale. Sadly you’re probably right. I know it’s a completely different offence but it will really show how serious they are about apply the rules consistently to the big and the lesser clubs. I fully expect them to get a relatively light punishment, probably a large fine which will be a drop in the ocean to their owners and a points deduction which might mean it’s tough for them to qualify for the champions league this season.
Lighthouse Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I would be curious to see how many Haaland scored in the National League North, if he stayed. 2
coalman Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago What needs to happen is the FA dish out a punishment so severe to Eckert and Southampton such that nobody notices them letting Man City off with a slapped wrist.
Miltonaggro Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I wonder what the Cambridge United manager and Charlie Austin have to say about this! 3
DrSuess1979 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, do i not like fizzy pop said: Steady on all, 114 guilty counts of serious financial breaches pale in to insignificance compared to sending a lad with an iPhone to watch a training session. Madness isn’t it!!! The football world is such a toxic shit hole 2
Draino76 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Miltonaggro said: I wonder what the Cambridge United manager and Charlie Austin have to say about this! We should interview this manager, then fuck him off.
John Boy Saint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago PL head must be spinning - many moons ago they propped up p*mpey to “protect the Premier League product” until the season ended when they naturally dropped through the trapdoor.. What damage does this do the Premier League product if they get the full force of the punishment - let them off lightly and the lid is off Pandora’s box. I’m just waiting for the FA to smokescreen the City hullabaloo by destroying Tonda as he’s small potatoes compared to a multi billion pound product.
Roo1976 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Kraken said: What should happen is that they get a Rangers style punishment and sent down to League 2. Some of the charges are awful, it’s way beyond overspending, it’s a huge deception, corruption and then cover up of finances from Man City. What will actually likely happen will be a massive dilution and Everton’s punishment will stay as being more severe. Much like Chelsea just got a slap on the wrist, but on a much bigger scale. fantasy football could look very different next season........?
bpsaint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, sfc4prem said: Has spoken a lot of sense in the last year, this man. Yep, big fan of Jordan these days, happy to ask the questions and state the facts most other pundits are too afraid to.
Willo of Whiteley Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Relegation (which won’t happen), 114 point deduction (which won’t happen), spread over the number of years they were implicated in cheating (which won’t happen). 🤷🏻♂️
Willo of Whiteley Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Miltonaggro said: I wonder what the Cambridge United manager and Charlie Austin have to say about this! Don’t forget James Cordan and Roman Kemp.
ooh it's a corner Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) I find it surprising that every article on the BBC allowed a have-your-say comments section on the Spygate saga. Most of which was opposing fans laughing at Saints or baying for blood. The multiple articles on the beeb are not opening up for public opinion on City's 115 charges result. Funny that. Personally I would like to see HMRC go after the "payments off record" piece and find out if anybody has got a dog with a Monaco bank account. Obviously, that is after the expulsion from the league, removal of all titles gained, permanent ban for all directors and senior staff, worldwide FIFA ban for all good players, (unless they are English and quite useful), public flogging of all Saudi Arabian directors etc.,etc., Edited 2 hours ago by ooh it's a corner
saintant Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago As Cloughie would say, 'Collect up all your medals and chuck them in the bin cos you won them by cheating' 2
Colinjb Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 1 hour ago, saintant said: As Cloughie would say, 'Collect up all your medals and chuck them in the bin cos you won them by cheating'
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now