Jump to content

Euro 2016


Batman

Recommended Posts

So our useless striker goes and ****s it up for Italy. The only thing I'm surprised at is that he didn't spend the next 10 minutes moaning at other people.

 

The sooner he leaves, the better.

 

Not being able to hit the target is criminal.

 

Haha! Yep Muller too I wouldn't have him in a Saints shirt either. Inept penalty takers every one. I can't agree with you enough.

In fact it's impossible to imagine a summing up more concisely done than is one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are the joke..Pelle has had a great tournament.

 

he's had an ok tournament. Two goals in the last minute of games against teams chasing a goal.

 

Appalling penalty.

 

He's a distinctly average player that brings very little to our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pele played for Italy in the same way as he plays for us , the commentators noticed him more as it's the Euros . His link up play was the same , lots of chesting down etc but not much domination in the box for a No9 . His goals were scored late on when defence was stretched but he did get in the right place . Still few attempts on target etc as for us ! So I suspect he will still be a Saint this coming season .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pele played for Italy in the same way as he plays for us , the commentators noticed him more as it's the Euros . His link up play was the same , lots of chesting down etc but not much domination in the box for a No9 . His goals were scored late on when defence was stretched but he did get in the right place . Still few attempts on target etc as for us ! So I suspect he will still be a Saint this coming season .

 

You make a very good point East Kent Saint. Conte has allowed Pelle to play the same way for club and country. This is one reason why England perpetually fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So our useless striker goes and ****s it up for Italy. The only thing I'm surprised at is that he didn't spend the next 10 minutes moaning at other people.

 

The sooner he leaves, the better.

 

Not being able to hit the target is criminal.

 

Stupid comment. Probably a wind up !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So our useless striker goes and ****s it up for Italy. The only thing I'm surprised at is that he didn't spend the next 10 minutes moaning at other people.

 

The sooner he leaves, the better.

 

Not being able to hit the target is criminal.

 

 

Got to be up with the most stupid of posts written on here....... clueless...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ray Wilkins was kicking off about England yesterday. Started off thinking he has been on the sauce but he actually made some sense.

He was hyper critical of the players saying they are bottlers. Too many English players in the country are bottlers.

 

He ripped into the likes of Walcott, Chamberlain, Loftus-Cheek and such like. saying not only are they failing the country, they are failing themselves. They should not go out on loan, they should have demanded to be sold a long time ago. He stated that they should go to clubs like southampton, west ham and stoke where they would play most weeks and shine. Not sit on their respective benches stealing a living.

 

He said he was saddened that about 3 players from the U21s that won their competition will actually feature fairly regularly for their premier league clubs with too many happy on their disgusting fat contracts and never playing (or happy to be sent out to Vitese)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ray Wilkins was kicking off about England yesterday. Started off thinking he has been on the sauce but he actually made some sense.

He was hyper critical of the players saying they are bottlers. Too many English players in the country are bottlers.

 

He ripped into the likes of Walcott, Chamberlain, Loftus-Cheek and such like. saying not only are they failing the country, they are failing themselves. They should not go out on loan, they should have demanded to be sold a long time ago. He stated that they should go to clubs like southampton, west ham and stoke where they would play most weeks and shine. Not sit on their respective benches stealing a living.

 

He said he was saddened that about 3 players from the U21s that won their competition will actually feature fairly regularly for their premier league clubs with too many happy on their disgusting fat contracts and never playing (or happy to be sent out to Vitese)

 

I was listening to the that and it was enjoyable listening when trying to cut the garden hedges

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which part of it is clueless?

 

Useless striker (not true), ****s it up for Italy (Zaza did the damage), the sooner he leaves the better (stupid), not being able to hit the target is criminal (no its just unfortunately something that can happen in a penalty shootout).

 

I reckon those bits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Them learning from mistakes very heavily relied on a few Italian players taking awful penalties tonight! Huge amount of luck is involved in any shootout. There have to be a team or two with a good record in shootouts over the years, that will always happen. Beyond that, people build up this great at shootouts, rubbish at shootouts mentality based on the first decade or so of what they've seen.

 

It's different players, managers, tournaments, fans. But there's no doubt if you buy into it you can handle the pressure better, or like England, fail miserably. Hard to come back when you've ingrained rubbish at penalties into your culture. That said, we've scored a lot of penalties in shootouts too so it clearly hasn't effected everyone.

Since their loss to Czechoslovakia, Germany have won 6 out of 6 shootouts, with only two misses prior to yesterday.

 

We all know England's record, 6 losses out of 7, in some cases not practicing because "you can't recreate the pressure during practice."

 

But that's ok, penalty taking is a lottery, and England are just unlucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

England’s Euro 2016 undermined by friction between Roy Hodgson and Gary Neville

• England manager’s methods were openly questioned by his own staff

• ‘The players got on fine. It was the coaches who fell out,’ the Observer is told

 

Exclusive by Daniel Taylor

Published: 22:30 BST Saturday, 02 July 2016

 

England’s Euro 2016 campaign was undermined by a deterioration in the working relationship between Roy Hodgson and Gary Neville and a series of disagreements among the coaching staff, the Observer can reveal.

 

While the England players bonded well during the tournament, it has emerged there was friction behind the scenes when it came to Hodgson and members of his backroom staff.

 

Although the relevant people all have considerable respect for one another, in the worst moments there was a clear divide about the team’s methods and, in particular, signs of tension between Hodgson and Neville.

 

England showed they never learn, never improve and never bounce back | Paul Wilson

Others became involved, with Hodgson’s methods openly being questioned by his own staff. “The players got on fine,” this newspaper has been told. “It was the coaches who fell out.”

 

The Football Association was so concerned about high jinks at the team’s base in Chantilly it has also emerged the £500-a-night Auberge du Jeu de Paume was told to remove its chandeliers before the players arrived or risk them being smashed. The hotel reopened this weekend and staff have revealed they took down their most expensive glass fittings because the FA was worried they might be damaged.

 

While the players were generally supportive of Hodgson and angered by reports that they questioned Raheem Sterling’s selection in the Iceland game, the fact they took it upon themselves to remove Harry Kane from corner-taking duties indicates they were not always happy with the manager’s tactics.

 

Hodgson’s training methods – questioned by Steven Gerrard after the last World Cup – were one source of the disagreements. Neville had a close ally in Dave Watson, the goalkeeping coach. Players have complained of mixed messages and the general sense of confusion is not eased by the revelation that one turned to the dugout during the Iceland defeat and asked where a team-mate was supposed to be playing.

 

The revelations come on the same day the FA’s chief executive, Martin Glenn, described his predecessors as “naive” for paying so much to previous England managers and made it clear the next appointment would be offered a performance-related salary.

 

Hodgson’s annual £3.5m pay meant he had the highest basic salary of all the managers at Euro 2016, though still considerably less than the £6m-a-year packages that were put in place for Fabio Capello and Sven-Goran Eriksson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty mundane event then. Ne'er a day goes by with a shooting somewhere or other.

Still not being reported by the French media though.

 

 

Ah just filtering through to the newsrooms now. Probably a stolen car just dumped somewhere near the Stadium.

Pure routine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the FA’s chief executive, Martin Glenn, described his predecessors as “naive” for paying so much to previous England managers and made it clear the next appointment would be offered a performance-related salary.

 

........And hopefully, a 3 month sentence in a "don't drop the soap" prison for any result similar to the the Iceland debacle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iceland being shown up for what they really are!

what happened to all that super coaching of Icelandic kids that negated Engalnds 150 to 1 population advantage that was being spouted when we lost

Or the excuse that premier players are overworked ( nearly all Frances team play in England too)

 

4-0 HT to France

 

What happened was that France passed the ball to each other and the ones who didn't have the ball all ran around to make things more difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said it was JUST luck?

 

I said England have bought into the failure mentality with shootouts after losing their first couple. That was always going to be possible for the team that lost the first couple. They aren't exactly things that come round often so nations have time to obsess on them. Germany went the other way.

 

In reality it's entirely different groups of footballers and shouldn't matter. The fact that it does it down to mentality.

 

As for 'you can't recreate the pressure...', you hear this all the time and it just makes me think 'why practice anything then?!'. Finishing a one on one is infinitely more pressured in a big game than training. Set pieces are, free kicks, everything. Yet teams practice over and over. The best penalty takers seem to practice. Why on earth wouldn't a player practice? Even if it helps you deal with the pressure just a tiny bit, it's worth it.

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/skills/4188836.stm

 

Mental strength and the repetition of movements.

 

And also this:

 

"Anxiety is the most significant contributing factor to performance failure in football penalty shootouts (Jordet et al., 2007, 2012). Indeed, the penalty is one of very few occasions in this predominantly fast-moving, team sport when players are under individual scrutiny and have sufficient time to think about the consequences of failure (Jordet & Elferink-Gemser, 2012). Furthermore, unlike most other skills that are susceptible to choking effects (e.g., golf putting), the opposing team’s goalkeeper increases uncertainty and has a direct influence on performance success"

 

http://www.bases.org.uk/Psychological-Preparation-for-Football-Penalty-Shootouts

 

"players score on fewer than 60% of their attempts when a miss will instantly result in a loss for the team compared to 92% of their attempts when a goal will win the game (Jordet et al., 2007). Jordet and colleagues have suggested that penalty takers’ perceptions of control may explain why some ‘choke’ under the pressure of the shootout and some players succeed. Players’ perceptions of control are influenced by both beliefs about the role of skill or luck (contingency), and their beliefs about their penalty taking ability (competence). Players with low perceived competence and contingency (who believe the outcome is dependent on luck or the goalkeeper’s actions rather than skill) experienced more cognitive anxiety symptoms than those who perceived their competence and contingency level as high (Jordet et al., 2006). "

 

So even practicing and giving yourself the belief that you're "good at penalties" is beneficial to being successful at them, even if the practice itself has no effect - which it does.

Edited by The9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genuinely cannot believe this front page. :lol:

 

If you can't read the text, basically The Sun and 'some fans' are outraged that the FA's comms manager for the tournament posted a photo on his Facebook and Twitter of his personalised headrest cover on the plane before the flight out there.

 

He posted the photo before the tournament even started!

 

 

CmeQT1xWIAA5lgt.jpg:large

Edited by Saint-Armstrong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, there has to be a loser. England weren't bad at penalties in 1996. We talk as if it's a national trait, but Gareth Southgate was the only one that missed out of 6. 5 players out of 6 converting doesn't suggest it has anything to do with technique for me, or that many players suffer from the mentality problem, just enough of them to see us consistently lose!

Venables partially learnt from past mistakes by having 5 players well-drilled and prepared for penalties. It worked against Spain. Unfortunately, he didn't seem to anticipate preparing more than 5 penalty takers.

 

In fairness, he had more players prepared than previous English managers, and some after too.

Edited by Dark Munster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guus Hiddink is still interested in being a national team coach, judging by his reaction to the interest from Russia. Could he do a job for England?

 

"Guus Hiddink wants to be considered for the England manager’s job and is seeking talks with the FA.

 

The Dutchman had intended to retire after ending his second spell as caretaker manager of Chelsea at the end of last season. However, he would consider returning to work for the right challenge, and the FA has indicated it would like to speak to the 69-year-old."

 

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/sport/football/article4758845.ece

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})