Jump to content

Donald Trump Appreciation Thread


Guided Missile

Saints Web Official US election  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you vote for?

    • Biden
      67
    • Trump
      17


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, View From The Top said:

Nothing to see here.

 

That has to be the most impressive of the state based frauds.

California's Presidential election result is certified as

Biden   63.5%    11,098,676 votes
Trump    34.3%    5,994,674  votes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
   
     
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, View From The Top said:

Nothing to see here.

It's escalating tonight.  LinWood and Powell have signed up to a call, along with pardonee Michael Flynn and others, for a 'temporary' imposition of martial law while the army supervises a rerun election to show Trump as the winner.  The US Trumpian right has literally gone insane.  I'm still sure none of this will change anything on 20 January, but how the mighty are falling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgia recount, unsurprisingly,  giving the same result as election night. As one of the officials said, "It's like watching a movie again, the ending is going to be the same". Meanwhile elsewhere, senior Republicans are slating the Attorney General, a Trump appointee, for saying that there is no evidence of fraud, and demanding he releases the 'evidence' that there is no fraud.

 As mass delusions go, this one is a belter.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either DT dosen't realize what a complete knob he's making himself look like, or it's the last desperate actions of a man knowing he's facing a massive battle to avoid jail when the presidential immunity disappears in January. He's been a total shower his whole life, his business ventures have been financially questionable (re the Atlanta casino venture, where he borrowed at such a high interest rate the casino would never be able to generate revenue to pay back the loan. His father sent an employee in one day who "bought" $1m worth of chips, then promptly left (without the chips), basically  a thinly veiled bail out).

I don't believe he expected to win the first time, and the massive hard-on that followed his victory has not abated. Mexico did not pay for his abhorent "wall", which will remain incomplete and utterly useless, and the COVID shambles makes him responsible for thousands of preventable deaths. The sad thing is that many thousands of Americans will believe the stolen election dogma for many years to come despite the total lack of any credible evidence. The distrust in the system that turned many voters towards him last time will only be consolidated by this bullshit. It's almost comparable to Hitler in his bunker as the Red Army rumbled through Berlin, planning counter-offensives with forces that didn't exist any more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another conspiracy theory on Twitter :- CoViD-19 is selectively targetting Republican members of Congress as compared to Democrats. ( Absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Dems take it seriously and mask up, whilst Reps congregate en masse and shun sensible precautions ).

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Donald is still at it. At a rally in Georgia ahead of the Senate runoff elections, which will decide control of the Senate, he told attendees, ( no masks or social distancing ), that if the Georgia Governor had any idea as to how to do his job he would overturn the election result, ( already signed off and certified ), and declare the state for Trump. He repeated all the lunatic conspiracy theories about the election being "rigged", and despite his claims about the electoral system urged his supporters to vote,"or else the communists", ( the Democrat candidates), "will win". ( Of course, if the system is rigged then there is no point in Republicans voting ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

The Donald is still at it. At a rally in Georgia ahead of the Senate runoff elections, which will decide control of the Senate, he told attendees, ( no masks or social distancing ), that if the Georgia Governor had any idea as to how to do his job he would overturn the election result, ( already signed off and certified ), and declare the state for Trump. He repeated all the lunatic conspiracy theories about the election being "rigged", and despite his claims about the electoral system urged his supporters to vote,"or else the communists", ( the Democrat candidates), "will win". ( Of course, if the system is rigged then there is no point in Republicans voting ).

He was on fine form yesterday. 90 minutes of rambling. Did you know that he likes cucumbers? He also likes blueberries and squashes.

He talks about running again in 2024 but by then surely even the Republican party will recognise his dementia?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

I can’t wait for the childish, petulant speech he’s going to give on Jan 20th, if he bothers to turn up at all.

It's been rumoured that he is planning to stage a rally where he will announce his plans to stand again in 2024, instead of attending the inauguration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Safe Harbour Day - enough states have certified their results to ensure Biden wins, subject to somebody on Trump's side trying get Congress to go against it's own rules, and possibly challenge the Constitution.

The ultimate irony will be Vice President Pence chairing the meeting of Congress that affirms Biden's Presidency.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Now the Attorney General in Texas has filed a complaint asking for the results in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Michigan to be set aside. He claims that changes made to dates and procedures for mail-in ballots by those 4 states in advance of the election were unlawful, despite Texas making exactly the same changes - which he isn't worried about because Trump won.

 And the Supreme Court, ( with 3 Trump appointees and a strong Republican majority ), issued a unanimous 1 line dismissal of the first case from the Trump side, so far, to reach them.

 I didn't realise the US was so keen on pantomime season.

 

As gets so often posted on the Brexit thread - "You lost, get over it !".

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Picard said:

Hmm, some Democrats not accepting election results...

Iowa Democrat to challenge 6-vote loss in appeal to US House

A 6 vote margin, the closest ever, for a single seat is being disputed here, with many votes appearing to have not been counted for various reasons. I don't see her bringing in a 'World Class" legal hit squad to try to overturn the entire national poll by claiming a dead Venezualan dictator fed suitcases full of votes to a secret server farm in Germany funded by China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean... do you think he genuinely has no idea that the ballots can be scanned an infinite number of times but still only be *counted* once due to the unique ID on them?

And does he still not grasp the fact that GA did a manual recount and the result came out the same?

I previously thought that he knows damn well none of this guff is true and is just trying to incite his base support, but I'm starting to wonder if he is genuinely that stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

I mean... do you think he genuinely has no idea that the ballots can be scanned an infinite number of times but still only be *counted* once due to the unique ID on them?

And does he still not grasp the fact that GA did a manual recount and the result came out the same?

I previously thought that he knows damn well none of this guff is true and is just trying to incite his base support, but I'm starting to wonder if he is genuinely that stupid.

The President of the US posts something like this and only 16,000 have tweeted about it. Shows just how low his credibility has fallen. People are just inured to whatever he says now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, scally said:

You boys might find this interesting, only saying

 

Not interesting, just desperate, pathetic, anti-democratic, and against the constitution. States are individually responsible for how they regulate and administer elections, Texas cannot determine how any other state makes it's regulations.

( PS, Texas made exactly the same changes as they are complaining about in the swing states. The only difference is that Trump won, so they aren't crying to SCOTUS ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Not interesting, just desperate, pathetic, anti-democratic, and against the constitution. States are individually responsible for how they regulate and administer elections, Texas cannot determine how any other state makes it's regulations.

( PS, Texas made exactly the same changes as they are complaining about in the swing states. The only difference is that Trump won, so they aren't crying to SCOTUS ).

😂😂 If it's not in the MSM I'm not interested

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Not interesting, just desperate, pathetic, anti-democratic, and against the constitution. States are individually responsible for how they regulate and administer elections, Texas cannot determine how any other state makes it's regulations.

( PS, Texas made exactly the same changes as they are complaining about in the swing states. The only difference is that Trump won, so they aren't crying to SCOTUS ).

Go to 4:50 This pisses on your bonfire that Texas did the same

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, scally said:

Go to 4:50 This pisses on your bonfire that Texas did the same

The whole idea of the appeal pisses on democracy and common sense.

The case revolves around whether the organisation managing the election in a specific state can make administrative or scheduling changes without reference to that state's legislature. The Supreme Court has previously ruled that this is entirely within the law and constitution, as such regulations are purely devolved and of no interest to Federal institutions, and this time around various states made changes to bring key dates forward to account for mail-in ballots and extend voter access due to the pandemic. Each state named in the suit made different specific changes, but none referred up to their State Congress.

 Texas extended the early voting period for the November 3, 2020 general election, extending it by six days to open on October 13, 2020, instead of October 19, 2020, as originally scheduled. Rules were also changed so that voters were required to be notified if their absentee ballots might be rejected due to signature mismatch, and election officials were required to give such voters a 'meaningful opportunity to cure' their ballots. Absentee/mail-in return locations were limited to one per county.

 Ergo - Texas made changes in the same way that they are disputing in the other states.

 

https://ballotpedia.org/Changes_to_election_dates,_procedures,_and_administration_in_response_to_the_coronavirus_(COVID-19)_pandemic,_2020

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

The whole idea of the appeal pisses on democracy and common sense.

The case revolves around whether the organisation managing the election in a specific state can make administrative or scheduling changes without reference to that state's legislature. The Supreme Court has previously ruled that this is entirely within the law and constitution, as such regulations are purely devolved and of no interest to Federal institutions, and this time around various states made changes to bring key dates forward to account for mail-in ballots and extend voter access. Each state named in the suit made different specific changes, but none referred up to their State Congress.

 Texas extended the early voting period for the November 3, 2020 general election, extending it by six days to open on October 13, 2020, instead of October 19, 2020, as originally scheduled. Rules were also changed so that voters were required to be notified if their absentee ballots might be rejected due to signature mismatch, and election officials were required to give such voters a 'meaningful opportunity to cure' their ballots. Absentee/mail-in return locations were limited to one per county.

 Ergo - Texas made changes in the same way that they are disputing in the other states.

Don't you just love copy and paste, sorry if it's in the MSM it's bullshit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, scally said:

Don't you just love copy and paste, sorry if it's in the MSM it's bullshit

The first paragraph is mine, the second is basically from the linked site - but then again I didn't try to hide the fact. Most of the first paragraph summarises the Texas lawsuit, as submitted to the Court, so it that's MSM then so is the lawsuit. ( It's posted on the Internet and quite easily found if you want to make your oiwn mind up for a change ).

Keep your tinfoil hat on, they're coming to find you. Out of interest, what OS do you use, what browser, what e-mail service, and what Social Media do you access ?

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently is is the protocol to stay any executions due in the transitional period and leave the decisions to the next President. Trump has signed off on the executions of 5 convicts. 
 

Playing a blinder? What a vindictive cunt. This has nothing to do with justice or basic humanity and everything to do with his bruised ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Apparently is is the protocol to stay any executions due in the transitional period and leave the decisions to the next President. Trump has signed off on the executions of 5 convicts. 
 

Playing a blinder? What a vindictive cunt. This has nothing to do with justice or basic humanity and everything to do with his bruised ego.

Bit of a segue but did you see that programme "I am a Killer"? The general prison regime is so brutal that at least two of the people interviewed committed a further murder solely to get onto the relatively cushy life on Death Row - where people typically lived for 20 years before sentence.  Perverse.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, buctootim said:

Bit of a segue but did you see that programme "I am a Killer"? The general prison regime is so brutal that at least two of the people interviewed committed a further murder solely to get onto the relatively cushy life on Death Row - where people typically lived for 20 years before sentence.  Perverse.    

No I didn’t, sounds crazy! That however is a separate issue. What Trump is doing here is being done out of spite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sadoldgit said:

No I didn’t, sounds crazy! That however is a separate issue. What Trump is doing here is being done out of spite. 

Yesterday they carried out the execution of a man who was convicted in 1999 - over 20 years ago!

If Trump was doing it 'out of spite' wouldn't it have made more sense for him to do so at the beginning of his Presidency?  It's not like the guy wasn't already in prison on 'death row' at that time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Yesterday they carried out the execution of a man who was convicted in 1999 - over 20 years ago!

If Trump was doing it 'out of spite' wouldn't it have made more sense for him to do so at the beginning of his Presidency?  It's not like the guy wasn't already in prison on 'death row' at that time!

It's to do with the traditional pause that takes place between presidencies, a tradition going back 150 years. 

Trump has decided to ignore this and push ahead with federal executions.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})