benjii Posted yesterday at 12:25 Posted yesterday at 12:25 14 hours ago, Lighthouse said: I'm not sure what your preoccupation with 'big, powerful athletes' stems from but it hasn't been our problem this season, nor was it in either of the two relegations. We got relegated because our players were terrible and we're 18th now because Still has no idea how to get the best out of the squad he asked for. Quarshie is 6'5", Wood is 6'2", so are THB and Charles and we've a few other players North of 6ft. I don't know what collection of large, muscular men you had in mind but the one we've got is sufficient. 4
Lighthouse Posted yesterday at 15:29 Posted yesterday at 15:29 17 hours ago, saintant said: Go watch Brentford, Bournemouth and Palace plus Man City, Liverpool, Arsenal etc etc You list our centre backs but you need these powerhouses in midfield, on the flanks and up front. Go watch some games with teams who get the blend right and if you think we're even coming close you're wearing your red and white tinted specs. Last years top three in the PL were the 12th, 20th and 15th tallest squads respectively, according to Give Me Sport. There is no correlation between that and performance, we went down because our team was the crappest, nothing more. Furthermore our biggest (Paul) and quickest (Sully) players were both useless. 1
Galway saint Posted yesterday at 16:29 Posted yesterday at 16:29 55 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: Last years top three in the PL were the 12th, 20th and 15th tallest squads respectively, according to Give Me Sport. There is no correlation between that and performance, we went down because our team was the crappest, nothing more. Furthermore our biggest (Paul) and quickest (Sully) players were both useless. Yes but those squads were assembled for a small fortune - those who can’t spend that big have to compensate to some degree with physicality and athleticism. We didn’t do that. remember the crazy gang ? 2
saintant Posted yesterday at 16:50 Posted yesterday at 16:50 1 hour ago, Lighthouse said: Last years top three in the PL were the 12th, 20th and 15th tallest squads respectively, according to Give Me Sport. There is no correlation between that and performance, we went down because our team was the crappest, nothing more. Furthermore our biggest (Paul) and quickest (Sully) players were both useless. Thanks for your research but you'll probably not be surprised that it fails to convince me. I still maintain our team would benefit greatly from having a lot more physicality all over the pitch and it's something we've lacked for a while. Having seen Brentford recently completely overpower West Ham I dread to think what they would do to our weaklings. 1
RedArmy Posted yesterday at 16:57 Posted yesterday at 16:57 28 minutes ago, Galway saint said: Yes but those squads were assembled for a small fortune So has ours for this league. 1
Lighthouse Posted yesterday at 18:12 Posted yesterday at 18:12 1 hour ago, Galway saint said: Yes but those squads were assembled for a small fortune - those who can’t spend that big have to compensate to some degree with physicality and athleticism. We didn’t do that. remember the crazy gang ? You pay for any attribute, be it physical or technical. Besides, Brentford have about five players who would have been our record signing, their squad wasn't exactly cheap either. The crazy gang was as close to WWII as it is to today, so not really relevant to modern PL transfer fees. Put simply; if it was that easy everyone would be doing it.
Lord Duckhunter Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Lighthouse said: Furthermore our biggest (Paul) He’s clearly not talking about lanky streaks of piss. We’re not powerful, physical or robust enough, that’s been obvious for years. Joe Jordan was only 5ft 11, Alan Shearer only just 6ft. It’s not about raw data, it’s about putting your foot in, and knocking people around. Brentford have bullied us the last few times we e met, that’s fuck all to do with money and everything to do with mentality. We’re soft as shite. Edited 23 hours ago by Lord Duckhunter 7
Lighthouse Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said: He’s clearly not talking about lanky streaks of piss. We’re not powerful, physical or robust enough, that’s been obvious for years. Joe Jordan was only 5ft 11, Alan Shearer only just 6ft. It’s not about raw data, it’s about putting your foot in, and knocking people around. Brentford have bullied us the last few times we e met, that’s fuck all to do with money and everything to do with mentality. We’re soft as shite. Yep, not true either, just a lazy go-to argument. Brentford just have better players than us, it’s really that simple. Our ‘soft as sh*te’ team got the third most bookings last season, Brentford had the second least. https://www.myfootballfacts.com/premier-league/all-time-premier-league/cards/premier-league-red-and-yellow-cards-2024-25/
Galway saint Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Lighthouse said: You pay for any attribute, be it physical or technical. Besides, Brentford have about five players who would have been our record signing, their squad wasn't exactly cheap either. The crazy gang was as close to WWII as it is to today, so not really relevant to modern PL transfer fees. Put simply; if it was that easy everyone would be doing it. Put simply - not everyone need do it; just us.
Lord Duckhunter Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, Lighthouse said: Yep, not true either, just a lazy go-to argument. Brentford just have better players than us, it’s really that simple. Our ‘soft as sh*te’ team got the third most bookings last season, Brentford had the second least. https://www.myfootballfacts.com/premier-league/all-time-premier-league/cards/premier-league-red-and-yellow-cards-2024-25/ What’s lazy is taking stats that are meaningless. What are booking for, arguing, not retreating 10 yards, celebrating a goal (maybe not, I’ll give you that). How many bookings were for putting in a reducer or showing some physicality, not many. Anyone who can’t see Brentford are far more physical than us, is clueless, probably the same type who rate Baz. 4
AlexLaw76 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) how can anyone, with a straight face, believe this man should remain in the job Absolutely appalling patterns of play, appalling formation, appalling selections, appalling results and, as highlighted today, appalling game management. SFC for the love of god, sack him Edited 2 hours ago by AlexLaw76 2
ant Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Shambolic mismanagement, and I maintain it isn't going to get better. Whatever the challenges of this squad, how the fuck have we contrived to end up facing a potential relegation battle? 1
Sheaf Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Lost the plot. No way he turns this round. Seems a good bloke, but woefully out of his depth here. The game management today has been spectacularly inept. 3
benali-shorts Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The worst in-game subs management I’ve ever seen 5
AlexLaw76 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Nathan Jones is miles ahead of this idiot. Still is a fucking embarrassment to the club
trousers Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Taking off Scienza this afternoon has pushed me off the fence... He has to go, and go now.... let's not repeat the same mistake we made this time last year when the clowns in charge gave Martin chance after chance when it was obvious he wasn't up to the job... 7
Simo is back Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Get him gone and do it before the team gets home !
Matthew Le God Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Hard to see him turning this around. He has now lost the support of the travelling fans. Shame Danny Rohl went to Rangers.
Baird of the land Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Gotta be saccked surely. Unless Sports Rebublic's goal is to play in league one. 1
RedArmy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Goes without saying now really doesn’t it. You’d have to be blind or mentally challenged to still want this man in charge.
ally_uk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Léo Scienza best player on the pitch we take him off...... Bring on Jack Stephens, immediately invite more pressure on ourselves..... what's the logic behind this ? Then weaken our attack we have two strikers on the bench... I'm sorry but what a fucking doughnut haha 🤣🤣🤣 Yeah I've seen enough of this shit show pull the trigger now.
stknowle Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) He gotsta go folks! Edited 2 hours ago by stknowle
Football Special Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The person who appointed him needs sacking as well 7
bpsaint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Hard to see him turning this around. He has now lost the support of the travelling fans. Shame Danny Rohl went to Rangers. You still of the opinion none of this is on Spors and his team, and Solak has taken steps to turn things around?
Baird of the land Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, sfc4prem said: His subs really do impact games. I thought some of our previous managers were weak at substitutions but still makes them seem like geniuses.
Suhari Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago It's simple: he has to go. Despite the lack of a 'proper number 9' we have a squad that is quality for this league. Should be doing far, far better. There's no patterns, style, organisation. It's a bunch of strangers kicking a ball, not a team. Get him out. 4
Turkish Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago Just got back to the car that was an absolute disgrace takes off the best player on the pitch brings on Stephens ffs fans rightly turned on the players at the end, chants of you’re not fit to wear the shirt, sacked in the morning at Still And sports republic get out of our club the fans have finally turned on this bunch of cunts from top to bottom 13
Disco Stu Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago He has this weird habit of taking off our best performing player. 3
Matthew Le God Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, bpsaint said: You still of the opinion none of this is on Spors and his team I have never said that. Why are you making things up?
RedArmy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Football Special said: The person who appointed him needs sacking as well Along with anybody who didn’t challenge it and ask what his credentials were. 1
Sheaf Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Didn't Still say he wanted to move back to the UK because of his partner's ill health? Maybe his plan was to take the job and then deliberately fuck it up as much as possible so he could get a massive payoff and then spend his free time with her. It's the only explanation I can think of for those utterly horrific subs today. It's like he wants to be sacked.
Winnersaint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Like many I wanted this to work. Its not! Now there is a manager who is currently without a job.
Lighthouse Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Winnersaint said: Like many I wanted this to work. Its not! Now there is a manager who is currently without a job. I know who you’re getting at but Branfoot’s got to be in his eighties by now. 1
Monk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago His brothers are clearly the brains. Trollope living up to his name. Carl Martin is just a glorified grassroots coach, been in the building too long. This level of anger is on par of the 9-0’s and some of RM’s gems. They have to go, it’s borderline negligence that set up and reaction in game. Blackburn were absolutely awful. I doubt this comment is going to be popular but it’s the Armstrong situation I can’t fathom. Misses two clear 1on1’s and stays on the pitch! He should’ve been hooked immediately!! Players couldn’t give a flying fuck except Leo. Hats off to the fans. I hope we give them hell if they’re in post for the next game. 5
saintstowin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) There is no control and organisation. It felt like a grassroots game. Other games have too. Not as bad as today was, but similar. No pattern, everyone rushing around, all individual play, no thoughtful, calm possession. And that is the manager's responsibility. I have sadly reached the conclusion he should go. Edited 2 hours ago by saintstowin
Elmore Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago He sounds so weak in interviews - how can he ever fire up a side to go and give it their all? Energy mirrors energy - and he has none.... 1
Saint NL Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Monk said: the Armstrong situation I can’t fathom. Misses two clear 1on1’s and stays on the pitch! He should’ve been hooked immediately!! Replace him with who? Downs? Or some kid that's never played for the senior team before? Besides, Archer was even worse than Armstrong and should have been replaced first 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now