Jump to content

25/26 - Non Saints Games

AlexLaw76

By AlexLaw76
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted (edited)

3 minutes of normal time left. At least 5 mins to add on I'd have thought.

Agent J'Rod on for Wrexham...

Edited by trousers
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said:

Watford hanging on 

They’re not really are they Wrexham have had a lot of the ball but created hardly anything 

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted

I thought Wrexham were shit, loads of the ball second half but just lumped long balls into the box which might have worked if Moore was there but didn’t really threaten Watford apart from corners and the cross the hit the top of the bar despite playing most of the second half in their half. 

  • Like 1
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
Just now, Midfield_General said:

We’ll lose tomorrow now

Nailed on 🤣

Did I mention that since I predicted we’d never lose another game we are in fact unbeaten?

  • Haha 5
RedArmy

RedArmy

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pamplemousse said:

Forget 6th, let's hunt down 5th.

Wouldn’t need to if we weren’t so shite agains them home and away. We’d be hunting down 2nd. 

  • Like 1
Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

The refereeing in this game has been appalling, the wrexham bias is just incredible. Obrian has had enough yellow card challenges to be sent off for starters.

What are you on about. It’s a man’s game, there was hardly a bad challenge all night. Man up. 

Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Hawkswood said:

Actually can't believe what Im seeing 

Beeb kindly typing out what I heard on the radio. Pretty clear that the rule was broken, and what the punishment would be. Not that this is definitely the end of it.

Article 82 states that if a team refuses to play or leaves the field before the end of regulation time without the referee's authorisation, it will be considered the loser and eliminated from the competition.

Article 84 complements this provision, stating that any team that violates Articles 82 will be permanently eliminated and will lose the match 3-0.

skintsaint

skintsaint

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Sarnia Cherie said:

90 minutes of the Comedy Club. Watching Rosenior try to overturn their 5-2 deficit into a win.  Not quite. 5-2 became 8-2.

image.png.8e53b9ecb1b2196bebf2ea38c257f49b.png

  • Haha 10
Sarnia Cherie

Sarnia Cherie

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, skintsaint said:

image.png.8e53b9ecb1b2196bebf2ea38c257f49b.png

Rosenior did that in the game against Newcastle. If anyone is out of their depth as a manager, it's him. You can't blame him for grabbing the chance to manage such a big club on a 6 year contract which will be a nice payout when he gets the push.

Willo of Whiteley

Willo of Whiteley

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Midfield_General said:

We’ll lose tomorrow now

Nailed on 🤣

This felt appropriate six weeks ago, now I have the utmost confidence we will finish in the play offs.

Hull will drop out, Middlesbrough will be displaced in 2nd by Ipswich.

Where the teams in the play offs finish is a complete lottery.

IMG_0791.jpeg

East Kent Saint

East Kent Saint

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, skintsaint said:

image.png.8e53b9ecb1b2196bebf2ea38c257f49b.png

The PSG goals came from a couple of triangular passing movements around Chelsea’s penalty box despite 5 defenders in the area , a bit Saintsy from the RM days 😃

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Midfield_General said:

‘LinkedIn Liam’

When will clubs realises these philosophy managers like LinkedIn Liam and Rusty are an embarrassment. It might all sound great in a boardroom on a PowerPoint but in a sport that is chaotic and so variable depending on so many factors some of which are out of the managers control sticking rigidly to a philosophy or this bollocks business speak is just laughable 

congratulations on LinkedIn Liam too, very good. 👏👏

  • Like 2
Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

When will clubs realises these philosophy managers like LinkedIn Liam and Rusty are an embarrassment. It might all sound great in a boardroom on a PowerPoint but in a sport that is chaotic and so variable depending on so many factors some of which are out of the managers control sticking rigidly to a philosophy or this bollocks business speak is just laughable 

congratulations on LinkedIn Liam too, very good. 👏👏

When they have competent people in the decision making structure. Not only to call it out when they see it. But also not to have been perpetuating it themselves, to their own bosses.

But also, there's a thread to the likes of Russ that sprinkles magic words. "I can deliver a style of play that is better than the sum of it's parts. As a result it is much cheaper in every area, will enable longevity as we bring in replacements, and give a profit in transfers." Rangers also got an extra line saying that such systems would make them more competitive in Europe, as it was modelled on Pep more than what St Mirren might be doing.

Gold dust in the air with these presentations. As SR know only too well.

Midfield_General

Midfield_General

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

congratulations on LinkedIn Liam too, very good. 👏👏

Much as I'd like to, I can't take the credit for that one unfortunately - the Chelsea fans coined it I think. They're not having him at all

Hawkswood

Hawkswood

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Beeb kindly typing out what I heard on the radio. Pretty clear that the rule was broken, and what the punishment would be. Not that this is definitely the end of it.

Article 82 states that if a team refuses to play or leaves the field before the end of regulation time without the referee's authorisation, it will be considered the loser and eliminated from the competition.

Article 84 complements this provision, stating that any team that violates Articles 82 will be permanently eliminated and will lose the match 3-0.

Tbh, I think I was most shocked that it had taken so long

  • Like 1
Doctoroncall

Doctoroncall

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Midfield_General said:

Much as I'd like to, I can't take the credit for that one unfortunately - the Chelsea fans coined it I think. They're not having him at all

It’s been in a few newspaper articles as well. A good nickname for him, definitely one on the Brent family tree. 

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Midfield_General said:

Much as I'd like to, I can't take the credit for that one unfortunately - the Chelsea fans coined it I think. They're not having him at all

Im not surprised when he comes out with this clap trap

Rosenior on Saturday had said his players "made a decision that they wanted to be around the ball, to respect the ball and show unity and leadership."

  • Haha 1
Doctoroncall

Doctoroncall

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Im not surprised when he comes out with this clap trap

Rosenior on Saturday had said his players "made a decision that they wanted to be around the ball, to respect the ball and show unity and leadership."

“Chelsea’s inability to respect the sacred sphere, perhaps, explained what came next: after the double huddle came the toil and the trouble.” Jonathan Wilson

Rosenior has a six year contract. 

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...