Jump to content

The Spygate Saga

St Chalet

By St Chalet
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Midfield_General

Midfield_General

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Sheaf Saint said:

I'd love to believe this, just like I really wanted to believe that they were keeping a dignified silence in the lead up to the hearing and had an ace up their sleeve to play. 

Sadly, as has been pointed out many times of the last few weeks, wherever SR are concerned you should always lean heavily towards incompetence as the explanation. Because it always turns out the be right one. 

Every. Single. Time.

image.gif.6c87c54d9293b8d69f972f1ce1663c2b.gif

  • Like 1
Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, BarberSaint said:

There was no 'crime'. 

 

There was an alleged breach (admitted) of a thing that has no real weight in law directly: Uberrima Fides and breach of a specific article, the terms surrounding which had not been drafted anywhere near well enough for them to not be subject to serious scrutiny and certainly watering-down were they ever tested robustly.

I went to the pictures with Uberrima Fides once. The Firm, as that's the sort of thing she liked. It were all right.

benjii

benjii

Posted
Posted (edited)

CAS is an arbitral body, it's not a sovereign court. Any arbitration is only possible if the parties involve have signed a valid arbitration agreement. In this case, the EFL rules are the arbitration agreement and the arbitral panel was the band of eeejits cobbled together by the appointed resolution body. If the arbitration agreement says no recourse to CAS then it's binding.

However, an arbitration agreement must still comply with the law and cannot be used to create perverse legal consequences. So a court challenge is still possible.

I don't think we will do; but that's the framework.

Edited by benjii
  • Like 3
OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint

OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, benjii said:

CAS is an arbitral body, it's not a sovereign court. Any arbitration is only possible if the parties involve have signed a valid arbitration agreement. In this case, the EFL rules are the arbitration agreement and the arbitral panel was the band of eeejits cobbled together by the appointed resolution body. If the arbitration agreement says no recourse to CAS then it's binding.

However, an arbitration agreement must still comply with the law and cannot be used to create perverse legal consequences. So a court challenge is still possible.

I don't think we will do; but that's the framework.

I'm hoping this isn't over. As time goes on, there will be a feeling of 'it's done, let's forget about it and move on' and as the events of the last couple of weeks become more distant, there's a likelihood this feeling will become more entrenched

Middlesbrough acted sub-judice. Their 'integrity' has to be questioned. Process wasn't followed and decisions were made by a kangeroo panel and board. There's plenty to investigate and a lot riding on it. So, I for one, want to see a court challenge.

  • Like 1
St Chalet

St Chalet

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The EFL should ask all teams, on the the threat of automatic relegation or expulsion should it be proved otherwise untrue, to sign an affadavit that they did not spy on opponents in season 2025/26.

Loads of this would have gone on, we just got caught.

 

  • Like 1
trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted (edited)

Even Gary Barlow's started to take the piss now... ;)

 

Screenshot_20260527-084052.Facebook.png

 

 

P.s. first post on this thread for 11 hours... 'spygate' fatigue kicking in at long last...? :)

Edited by trousers
  • Haha 1
Saint Garrett

Saint Garrett

Posted
Posted
On 15/05/2026 at 00:30, LeG said:

Will say more when it’s done and give context. I’d be moronic to do that now on a public forum. No order from the top though. 
 

 

Cmon then LeG...

trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted
On 14/05/2026 at 17:15, LeG said:

Dragan / the board are fuming. 

 

On 15/05/2026 at 00:30, LeG said:

Will say more when it’s done and give context. I’d be moronic to do that now on a public forum. No order from the top though. 
 

 

 

2 hours ago, Saint Garrett said:

Cmon then LeG...

 

2 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

Yeah I was waiting for this too. The only true ITK on the forum.

I assume we're not yet up to the "when it's done" point on @LeG's timeline, given we're still waiting for the club to deal with the fallout....?

  • Like 3
hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, trousers said:

 

 

 

I assume we're not yet up to the "when it's done" point on @LeG's timeline, given we're still waiting for the club to deal with the fallout....?

Doing some snooping on his profile and the last thing he liked was a comment about Tonda being keen to speak. I wonder if that is a suggestion that he isn't as bang to rights or as clearly guilty as we may think? Also said that Larin will sign if we want him which is good news. Hope Stewart can too.

Viking Saint

Viking Saint

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, LGTL said:

I received my refund today, so that’s something at least. 

Did you get an email to let you know or does it just appear back on your account??

RedArmy

RedArmy

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, LGTL said:

I received my refund today, so that’s something at least. 

I got a notification to say it’s been issued but still waiting for the money in the bank. 

West Dean FC Legend

West Dean FC Legend

Posted
Posted

Bad news everyone. 

Looks like we might have lost our Champions of Cheating title. West Bromwich Albion are now being investigated thoroughly - not sure what they did to Middlesbrough but lots of talk of them being 'huge cheats'....oh well we can't even win that challenge.

  • Sad 1
tdmickey3

tdmickey3

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, West Dean FC Legend said:

Bad news everyone. 

Looks like we might have lost our Champions of Cheating title. West Bromwich Albion are now being investigated thoroughly - not sure what they did to Middlesbrough but lots of talk of them being 'huge cheats'....oh well we can't even win that challenge.

Lots of teams are at it, the whole thing is an complete overreaction to very little

Edited by tdmickey3
Graffito

Graffito

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Doctoroncall said:

Just for the record 

Spy gate the original

Guardian certainly changed their tune 7 years on, but that was the great Bielsa. 

Spy gate 2.0

Different author and no comments on the last article.

 

Yeah quite a turnaround in 7 years (and not just the Guardian of course)which can’t be explained simply by the introduction post Bielsa of rule 127. The media onslaught instigated by Boro probably helped set the tone.

Incidentally, the author of the second article says “The EFL regulation [127] refers to “sporting sanction”. It is hard to see what that could amount to and still be meaningful if it were not to award the game to Middlesbrough.”

Does it? Perhaps I’m misreading it the regulation. This is one of the issues. Had the EFL introduced a clear sporting sanction with regulation 127 none of this would have happened. As it was, we know at least one club was stupid enough to think it could observe opposition training during the 72 hour prohibition and simply pay a £200,000 fine.

Tamesaint

Tamesaint

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, West Dean FC Legend said:

Bad news everyone. 

Looks like we might have lost our Champions of Cheating title. West Bromwich Albion are now being investigated thoroughly - not sure what they did to Middlesbrough but lots of talk of them being 'huge cheats'....oh well we can't win that challenge.

Bloody hell. Just when I thought we had won some silver. 

Source??? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...