Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Turkish said:

A player we MUST sign but will miss out on due to our LACK of ambition. It’s VERY concerning 

Fiddling while Rome burns as usual. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, CB Fry said:

Fiddling while Rome burns as usual. 

We might as well give up any thoughts of promotion now and save the hope 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Saint86 said:

They will absolutely walk the league with that kind of budget and Nuno at the helm. Very unfortunate.

Nah! This is the season that Saints set new all time records and walk the league. Record points, most goals, fewest against COYR

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Turkish said:

We might as well give up any thoughts of promotion now and save the hope 

Anyone mentioned Alpine’s run like a ‘B&B’ theory yet ? 

Posted
1 hour ago, benjii said:

He'll look back and wish he'd done something else. He can earn a pile of cash in England and be respected and then do a couple of years in Saudi later, or he can sit around in Saudi being bored shitless and disrespected by me.

Like what? We're talking about a West Ham player, not Lamine Yamal. He's not good enough to sign for a title-competing team like City or Arsenal. The best I could see him doing would be about another seven years at a club like Spurs or Everton and maybe having an outside chance of winning a domestic cup.

Posted
2 hours ago, Saint86 said:

They will absolutely walk the league with that kind of budget and Nuno at the helm. Very unfortunate.

Only if they re-invest it wisely. Their track record of buying expensive flops over recent years is quite something.

  • Like 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, SuperSAINT said:

 

Harrison Reed coming back this way would be nice. He'd surely be surplus to requirements there if they sign Charles. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, egg said:

Harrison Reed coming back this way would be nice. He'd surely be surplus to requirements there if they sign Charles. 

Not at all the player we would need though 

Edited by Fabrice29
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Saint86 said:

They will absolutely walk the league with that kind of budget and Nuno at the helm. Very unfortunate.

We will be done with them by January, so in the run up to the finish they will be taking points off our rivals. They play Boro and wolves near the end too.  Let them run away with it, they'll help us solidify second.

  • Like 1
Posted

West Ham are not running away with the league 😂 Has nobody watched them recently? Clubs a mess both off the pitch and on it. They aren’t suddenly turning into a winning machine whatever money they make and PR they get.

Posted
1 minute ago, Fabrice29 said:

West Ham are not running away with the league 😂 Has nobody watched them recently? Clubs a mess both off the pitch and on it. They aren’t suddenly turning into a winning machine whatever money they make and PR they get.

They'll finish top 2 fairly comfortably IMO

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said:

West Ham are not running away with the league 😂 Has nobody watched them recently? Clubs a mess both off the pitch and on it. They aren’t suddenly turning into a winning machine whatever money they make and PR they get.

Agreed. 

Wolves are most likely to run away with it. You watch, it'll be Stoke or someone random now. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

They'll finish top 2 fairly comfortably IMO

That’s a far cry from walking the league. I’m happy to revisit this but they scream meltdown potential to me. Ownership is a mess with some serious allegations going on. Fans will be keen to jump on anyone’s back they can. Coach always give the vibe he’s doing everyone a favour despite bang average results. And they even have an ex player with friends in the media who will be waiting in the wings to jump in at the first sign of a bad result or two.

Big reputation, big media focus, big money to be splashed but until they’ve proven they can actually handle that hype and spend money wisely I’m quite happy to oppose them. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Patrick Bateman said:

Agreed. 

Wolves are most likely to run away with it. You watch, it'll be Stoke or someone random now. 

Don’t really like Wolves that much either or any of the relegated teams but agree they are the most likely. Pretty sure if I was looking at it neutrally I’d be looking at the form team in the league last season, who have an injustice to motivate them and will have a pretty similar squad to choose from….🫣

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Lighthouse said:

Like what? We're talking about a West Ham player, not Lamine Yamal. He's not good enough to sign for a title-competing team like City or Arsenal. The best I could see him doing would be about another seven years at a club like Spurs or Everton and maybe having an outside chance of winning a domestic cup.

I thought he looked petty damn good for West Ham and Holland in the World Cup and that clubs like Liverpool and Barca might fancy him. Perhaps the price put them off.

Posted

Wolves seem like a bit of a basket case off the field. Player rows behind the scenes, lots of disruption going on. If anyone is going to do a Leicester it'll be them

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Pamplemousse said:

Wolves seem like a bit of a basket case off the field. Player rows behind the scenes, lots of disruption going on. If anyone is going to do a Leicester it'll be them

Really? I'd say Burnley look the most basket case like with their managerial shenanigans and lack of signings. 

Posted

To be fair, all three are going through some pretty major changes. Burnley have left it late too and would be surprised if they replicate their last four championship seasons quite so easily this time.

Posted

There was me thinking that this is the summer transfer thread. Turns out it’s a discussion about which team is most likely to melt down 😮

Posted
27 minutes ago, Pamplemousse said:

Wolves seem like a bit of a basket case off the field. Player rows behind the scenes, lots of disruption going on. If anyone is going to do a Leicester it'll be them

Just read about that. Seem strange and could possibly lead to more if they dont get off to a good start

Posted
39 minutes ago, Cuddles said:

Who else thought Leicester might run away with it last season? Before it started of course.

I thought Ipswich would. I expected an Ipswich Leicester one two before a balls was kicked. West Ham should have enough about them to win this time around but I guess they may need to add to their squad. I’m not 100% sold on Nuno but he did amazing with Forest so it’s probably my own bias. 
 

All that being said I think we’ll be in the mix. My only major worry is losing/struggling to replace THB and the Stewart shaped hole up top - may resolve soon!

Posted

The playoffs also include more teams this season (3rd - 8th) so all the relegated teams have a little extra safety net to get back up.

Posted
11 hours ago, SuperSAINT said:

 

Decent club for us for him to goto, would play enough there and if he smashes it I hope we get a nice selling on fee for the next big move on from there.,

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, musesaint said:

There was me thinking that this is the summer transfer thread. Turns out it’s a discussion about which team is most likely to melt down 😮

I know right, and the best part is that we're not in the running for it 🤣😂

Posted
33 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

Decent club for us for him to goto, would play enough there and if he smashes it I hope we get a nice selling on fee for the next big move on from there.,

Agreed. Seems a sensible move for him. Hopefully we include a good sell on fee as I can see him doing well there and then earning a bigger move in a couple of seasons.

Posted
19 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

One way to spend all your Morgan Rogers riches in one go.

They're paying £8m initially, with a further £12m in potential add-ons.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Oi, I made that joke first 😀

Did you, Imissed that, I skip past your posts lol 😀...only kidding

Edited by OldNick
Posted
13 hours ago, Fabrice29 said:

That’s a far cry from walking the league. I’m happy to revisit this but they scream meltdown potential to me. Ownership is a mess with some serious allegations going on. Fans will be keen to jump on anyone’s back they can. Coach always give the vibe he’s doing everyone a favour despite bang average results. And they even have an ex player with friends in the media who will be waiting in the wings to jump in at the first sign of a bad result or two.

Big reputation, big media focus, big money to be splashed but until they’ve proven they can actually handle that hype and spend money wisely I’m quite happy to oppose them. 

Blimey are they?  Seems to me that they've sold 2 good players for an extroadinary amount of money, kept their best player along with looking like they're going to keep a load of others, sorted out their ownership, and will likely invest a chunk of what they've brought in. Sold 50k season tickets, and fans (like us) will enjoy winning most weeks. If they carry on with the squad they seem to have and add a couple of very good players for this league, they should walk it. Anything else for them surely is a failure

  • Like 4
Posted
37 minutes ago, westmidlandsaint said:

I mean god they needed a striker - they were toothless upfront in the playoffs

Interesting to see how they do. They’ve lost Hackney and Fry so two pretty big holes to fill. Shame we didn’t get Lankshear, he may well prove his worth but it’s a big gamble at that price tag. 

Posted
58 minutes ago, Saint Garrett said:

Blimey are they?  Seems to me that they've sold 2 good players for an extroadinary amount of money, kept their best player along with looking like they're going to keep a load of others, sorted out their ownership, and will likely invest a chunk of what they've brought in. Sold 50k season tickets, and fans (like us) will enjoy winning most weeks. If they carry on with the squad they seem to have and add a couple of very good players for this league, they should walk it. Anything else for them surely is a failure

I’m not sure they have sorted their ownership and not convinced their squad is that good, aside from an obvious couple of stand outs.
 

But my point is the idea they just turn everything around into a winning team and ‘walk it’ seems a long way away to me. Maybe they will, but not many do straight away after relegation do they? Recently anyway. Not without exceptional managers who go on to some of the biggest jobs in the world and Nuno isn’t that. They haven’t spent that money yet either. And yes, if they win games everything will be rosey but if they don’t then I think it turns quickly. We’ll see I guess.

Posted
29 minutes ago, do i not like fizzy pop said:

Good job Gibbo is such a tough negotiator 🤣

 

Screenshot_20260722_160233_X.jpg

Lot of money for a championship team, for a guy with one full season under his belt.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Can't say I had noticed Lankshear before the link but I can imagine if we signed him for this amount, after 18 months in championship, 11 goals in 55 games there would have been a lot of negativity.

Particularly when he is described as a goal poacher.

No idea if he is any good.

Edited by West end Saints
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Bored of their antics. He was always worth close to 30.

If Rogers is worth over 100M then  he is deffo worth 30 M. 

I had Rogers in my fantasy league team for a few weeks and he did nothing. It would not suprise me if Charles got more goalsand assists  than Rogers this   calander year.  

  • Like 1
Posted

The same West Brom ITK who had all the Fellows to Saints info last summer is saying that they’re in talks with us to sign Cameron Archer for £5m (£3m initial payment, £2m in bonuses) 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...