Jump to content

The United Kingdom and the Death of Boris Johnson as we know it.


CB Fry

SWF (Non Legally Binding) General Election  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. SWF (Non Legally Binding) General Election

    • Conservatives
      42
    • Labour
      65
    • Liberals
      54
    • UKIP
      1
    • Green
      18
    • Brexit
      8
    • Change UK
      0
    • Other
      5


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, whelk said:

12 years of power. Their angle - it’s Labours fault.

 

A671A27A-5846-4DC5-A9B4-262E691C98D9.jpeg

That comment is wrong - in 2008/09 the Labour Government launched the "Next Generation" plan for nuclear power, it was the debate after Fukushima that stalled things, under the ConDem coalition.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not fair, why aren't we instigating a no fly zone, we should be interferering etc etc :

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/saudi-air-defences-destroy-houthi-drones-state-tv-2022-03-25/

Quote

RIYADH, March 26 (Reuters) - Yemen's Houthis said they launched attacks on Saudi energy facilities on Friday and the Saudi-led coalition said oil giant Aramco's petroleum products distribution station in Jeddah was hit, causing a fire in two storage tanks but no casualties.

On another note, maybe this time Boris's incompetence and failure to get any assurances from the Saudis regarding oil supply hasn't worked out too badly given the lack of security of the product in the country.  Looks like some more cracking news for fuel price rises :mcinnes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Headline on the BBC;

"England schools set for minimum week length in new rules".

Is there nothing this lot won't interfere with, surely 7 days is settled and accepted as the appropriate number ?

 

 

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Headline on the BBC;

"England schools set for minimum week length in new rules".

Is there nothing this lot won't interfere with, surely 7 days is settled and accepted as the appropriate number ?

 

 

Schools are going to be asked to 'teach' for 32.5 hours a week - The horror

standby for mass threats of strikes etc.

 

Edited by AlexLaw76
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Schools are going to be asked to 'teach' for 32.5 hours a week - The horror

standby for mass threats of strikes etc.

 

Empty bs from them as always but look their little uninformed darling is getting excited already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Schools are going to be asked to 'teach' for 32.5 hours a week - The horror

standby for mass threats of strikes etc.

 

32.5 hours you say? Where do I send my overtime form 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the spirit of Guided "shit for brains' Missile who likes to post right wing articles , I thought this from the other political wing was worth posting. 

A lot less turgid than SFB's posts and far more accurate about the current state of Britain.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/27/rishi-sunak-is-taking-us-for-mugs-180-smart-mugs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Schools are going to be asked to 'teach' for 32.5 hours a week - The horror

standby for mass threats of strikes etc.

 

You obviously don't have the faintest idea of how a teacher's working week pans out, and how many hours it requires. Your post is typical uninformed reactionary tripe.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warriorsaint said:

Human Rights Act next. Just waiting for the right wing knobheads who complained about lockdowns wetting themselves over getting rid of more rights.

They just don’t see it lol

Employment rights first. Most people wouldn't notice the HRA being undermined, ERA affects them directly every working day.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

You obviously don't have the faintest idea of how a teacher's working week pans out, and how many hours it requires. Your post is typical uninformed reactionary tripe.

It's as if the Daily Mail online comments section has achieved self awareness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Met have quietly issued 20 fines for breaking lockdown with the parties, but no names yet. Presumably Alexander will consider the matter closed, and we must move on, jabs in arms and CAPTAIN HINDSIGHT would have us all in LOCKDOWN fastest growing economy in the G7 (but not really) etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60957670

".…...one former insider told the BBC they had heard junior members of staff had been fined, while senior staff had not, and that this was "disgraceful"."

"One other government source said police had targeted "low-hanging fruit", and another agreed this appeared to be the police's approach."

"Civil servants have not been provided with help for legal costs and are being advised to pay any fines they receive, while senior staff and politicians have paid for private legal advice"

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60957670

".…...one former insider told the BBC they had heard junior members of staff had been fined, while senior staff had not, and that this was "disgraceful"."

"One other government source said police had targeted "low-hanging fruit", and another agreed this appeared to be the police's approach."

"Civil servants have not been provided with help for legal costs and are being advised to pay any fines they receive, while senior staff and politicians have paid for private legal advice"

Not that much of a surprise, although why they have only been issued £50 instead of the standard £100 is a mystery.

I guess that's what happens when you make the local 'constable' judge, jury and executioner with all the power to decide who does and doesn't get fined....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 items of interest on the news today;

First, Rishi Sunak's wife is a 'non-dom' for tax purposes, but nobody knows where she actually does pay tax, ( if at all  ).

Second, Kwasi Kwateng says that in this country 'we do not impose infrastructure on people, it requires local consent'. So that rules out any chance of reopening the fracking wells. Good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll be interesting to see how he spins this.  Up till now the only thing he's apologised for is giving the perception that he didn't follow the law, not that he actually did break it.  I imagine he'll apologise with a smirk on his face and say he's far too busy raising the cost of living to consider resigning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compared with the blatant corruption swilling around the party, lying to parliament is pretty lightweight, but I guess the occupants of no.10 and no.11 being issued fines confirms this cabinet as the worst in living memory.

Vote for a clown, get a circus.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He not only has broken the law, he has broken one that he implemented. I think it is a given that he has to resign now but knowing what a brazen bastard he is no doubt he will try and tough it out. He has already prepared the ground by saying that he had been misadvised. Not that he held any moral high ground before, but how can he maintain his position now that he is a proven liar and law breaker? He has to go. Now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No chance Boris goes willingly, and the timing of this means Parliament is on a break until next week, by which time they will have done their best to come up with as many distractions as possible. I'm sure Putin will be willing to help!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Add to this a Tory MP being convicted of sexual assault against a teenager and Crispin Blunt (MP) immediately posting on social media that it is a "dreadful miscarriage of justice".

The Government is clearly a morality free zone.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They both should go now of course, but this Conservative government and wider parliamentary party are as spineless as any I have ever seen. 

The wider party will need an electoral reason to get rid of him and if the opposition parties can hammer the point hard enough over the next three weeks, the local elections might just be that opportunity. Any new leader will then have two years to sort this out, most likely with the benefit of a recovering economy and the option to bring in a new Chancellor and reverse some of the tax rises Sunak has brought in (I personally don't think the tax rises are inherently wrong, we have to pay for the last two years somehow - just the timing, but he certainly hasn't helped himself with the Tax situation of his wife and even his own)

In terms of replacements, I haven't got a clue. There aren't any immediate front runners that spring to mind, but if Sunak is being taken down too it may actually help the situation. Liz Truss is apparently in with a shout (I can't understand why), but I have repeatedly seen support for Penny Mordaunt too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Those at the heart of power, and with all the information, were not scared of covid! Did their best to scare the rest of us though

Why?  What do think their big plan is?

I just assumed they were selfish cunts that just expected everyone else to do the hard work of sacrificing their freedoms for the greater good (to restrict the spread and prevent scenes in our hospitals like the ones than happened in Italy etc.).

Edited by StDunko
additons
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, aintforever said:

What information did they have that we didn’t?

The Lizard People had informed the Bilderberg Group that Microsoft had engineered nano-bots that could be injected to effect either mind control or global de-population.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, StDunko said:

Why?  What do think their big plan is?

I just assumed they were selfish cunts that just expected everyone else to do the hard work of sacrificing their freedoms for the greater good (to restrict the spread and prevent scenes in our hospitals like the ones than happened in Italy etc.).

They clearly were not worried one bit about getting COVID and getting seriously ill/dying.  They were not worried one bit it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

They clearly were not worried one bit about getting COVID and getting seriously ill/dying.  They were not worried one bit it seems.

Yeah Boris hardly noticed when he caught Covid.

Not many equated no socialising with actually staying safe but did it as we are not rule breakers by and large

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whelk said:

Yeah Boris hardly noticed when he caught Covid.

Not many equated no socialising with actually staying safe but did it as we are not rule breakers by and large

Boris got Covid, and still was not worried about it afterwards - clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

They clearly were not worried one bit about getting COVID and getting seriously ill/dying.  They were not worried one bit it seems.

Two years in and you still haven't grasped the following simple reality:

- for most individuals the risk presented by Covid is low

- for societies, the risk presented by huge waves of simultaneous covid is high.

That is why "personal responsibility" or "its my choice" doesn't wash, unless you're a sociopath. It is why a leader needs to follow the rules that are set.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, benjii said:

Two years in and you still haven't grasped the following simple reality:

- for most individuals the risk presented by Covid is low

- for societies, the risk presented by huge waves of simultaneous covid is high.

That is why "personal responsibility" or "its my choice" doesn't wash, unless you're a sociopath. It is why a leader needs to follow the rules that are set.

essentially, covid was/is not dangerous for almost the entire population. 

We all know it now, knew it then.  Their parties demonstrated it.

During that time, we stopped people from seeing their dying loved ones and such like.

Edited by AlexLaw76
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

essentially, covid was/is not dangerous for almost the entire population. 

We all know it now, knew it then.  Their parties demonstrated it.

During that time, we stopped people from seeing their dying loved ones and such like.

Is there any subject you aren’t basically clueless on?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, whelk said:

Is there any subject you aren’t basically clueless on?

No need to be rude.  Just pointing out that even obese people like Boris, who had covid, were not worried 1-jot about their (and their loved-ones) safety, whilst keeping us locked in our houses.

Maybe, the lockdown/restrictions were just too severe, as claimed by so many at the time and since?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many people have backed him this far that they cannot admit now that they got it so wrong.

The brave would admit it, but the stubborn will never accept the facts - the worst PM in our history, he's turned us into an international joke.

We need our country back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lighthouse changed the title to The United Kingdom and the Death of Boris Johnson as we know it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...