egg Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, Saint Fan CaM said: Thanks to Parsons fessing up like a naughty schoolgirl the club had no choice but to batten down the hatches and attempt to control what was an utter shitshow. Tonda was part of it yes, but he’s no child killer FFS. Accountability starts at the top. Parsons opening his mouth was stupid, but the evidence may have meant we were screwed anyway. Who knows. I'd like to know whether Tonda has lost the dressing room, but regardless, his position is untenable for me.
Cuddles Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, egg said: I'd like to know whether Tonda has lost the dressing room, but regardless, his position is untenable for me. You've made him Tonda Egg-hurt with that comment 😭 2
Pilchards Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The more I think about it the more I prefer him to stay. (1) Don’t trust them to get a decent replacement (Will Still springs to mind) (2) Everyone hates us so they might as well hate us with him in charge. (3) He actually knows his stuff and brings on subs to win games. (4) The players work and respect him. (5) He’s a mean bastard and has a part of Fergie/Jose about him. 6
Saint86 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Every club is going to refer to us as "the cheats" etc., next year. May as well own it and rub their faces in it to boot... Everyone knows he's a quality coach, every club wants us to sack him or be made to sack him. It's not disputable that he is class manager, possibly the best in the league, and he's tainted now - so basically he's our if we want him. If he doesn't get banned and the 26/27 squad will stick with him, we would be stupid to sack him... Really is that simple. I know some fans struggle with the media/peer pressure and engaging their own critical thinking skills (the voting on this thread is proof enough of that with the initial sway from 70% "sack" to near 50/50 now - thankfully). Blackmore is a prime example of someone who gets wrapped up in it and just goes with the flow. But bottom line - we are all saints, as it tonda and the squad, sod the outside - they've already judged us... It is time to close ranks and stick together. None of the outside noise changes that this team and manager would have been in contention for the best ever championship team... Imagine if city hasn't scored an 82nd minute deflected bouncing shot from outside the box, imagine if we had got promotion... yes we stupidly broke a stupid rule, but this team was performing near miracles. You don't blow that up unless we're forced to. Edited 1 hour ago by Saint86 8
Wade Garrett Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 59 minutes ago, Saint Fan CaM said: He’s a nipper probably living with his parents, but that’s not the point. He’s no better off now than if he resigned with his head held high. As I keep saying I don’t blame him - I blame Parsons as the architect of policy. And yes, in another life in the past I’ve resigned because I disagreed with corporate policy - I took on that responsibility for myself. Don’t blame Eckert then for instigating the whole sorry episode. Righto.
Tom & Gerry Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I'm coming round, but he's going to be banned isn't he? Mind you he only needs half a season and will he have the players next season? We could wait for the FA verdict and then it would take one hell of an apology.
Graffito Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago From the information in the public domain his position is untenable. I’m surprised he’s still there. You wonder whether that’s more indecision and dithering by SR or whether there’s something else holding it up. Nonetheless, this article for me adds to the sense that we may be losing an excellent coach. (I read the article in the newspaper. This is behind a paywall so can’t help if you don’t have a subscription). https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/tonda-eckert-southampton-spygate-play-offs-dn722kv26 2
Oldandtired Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) I take it that all the hard line moralists on here will be rocking up to Fratton Park next season if he keeps his job? Edited 51 minutes ago by Oldandtired 3
saintant Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago If the players are happy then let him carry on. This will have taught him a huge lesson and he'll know he's cost the club big time. The noise will subside in time. The press and pundits have had more than their pound of flesh. So keep him if at all possible, circle the wagons and work doubly hard next season. Tonda has all the motivation he needs. I get this may be all too simplistic and may not be possible. However, he's a young manager and we can allow him this mistake albeit is a big one. Let's not cut off our nose to spite our face if there is an alternative. People including Saints fans can forgive and forget.
SaintsLoyal Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago Show me a player that would play for Eckert EVER again ! I expect most of our squad want his head on a stick for whats happened and rightly so. 1
OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago In the main, I get my 'news' from the SaintsWeb site and form an opinion on the various views. But speaking to other Saints' fans today, they said there's texts between Tonda and analysts where he's saying go back and watch the team again because he wasn't happy with the results and analysts texting him saying are you sure we should be doing this? Surely he knew he was breaking the rules. I can see SFC releasing this kind of stuff to make it sound like he was a loose cannon, but given his connection to Spors, it's hard to believe he also did not know what was going on. So it's not just Tonda that needs to go. If the last two weeks are anything to go by, the Saints hierarchy will drag their feet and wait for the FA's decision. But if SFC want to keep him, they need to get going and trivialise the rules he broke, threaten to sue anyone who continues to call him a cheat (he's only a rule breaker) and generally go on the offensive. Nah, you're toast Tonda.
saintant Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, SaintsLoyal said: Show me a player that would play for Eckert EVER again ! I expect most of our squad want his head on a stick for whats happened and rightly so. You don't know that. 1
Bakovnetski Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago The trust is lost. He can't come back from that. 1
pimpin4rizeal Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, SaintsLoyal said: Show me a player that would play for Eckert EVER again ! I expect most of our squad want his head on a stick for whats happened and rightly so. What makes you sure they knew nothing about it anyway .
2Morrow Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago Changed my mind. Keep the prick, hes our prick. First unbeaten season in the champ. 1
saintant Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago The punishment meted out by the heavyhanded EFL has turned this into a 'let's all hate Eckert' feeding frenzy. Let's be honest the punishment in no sense fitted the crime. So let's be critical of him because he was stupid but we shouln't multiply our criticism just because the EFL decided to play to the crowd and bow to the demands of a bunch of blood thirsty journos and pundits. 1
egg Posted 28 minutes ago Posted 28 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, SaintsLoyal said: Show me a player that would play for Eckert EVER again ! I expect most of our squad want his head on a stick for whats happened and rightly so. I spoke with a prominent ex player in the week. He thinks the lads will feel that way, and won't want to play for him.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 27 minutes ago Posted 27 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Cuddles said: I don't think they will ban him you know. Not unless they can prove he was bullying really badly. If they're going to apply HR practices that exist elsewhere to football squads, coaching and back room, there's going to be a lot of vacancies coming up.
Oldandtired Posted 7 minutes ago Posted 7 minutes ago 19 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: If they're going to apply HR practices that exist elsewhere to football squads, coaching and back room, there's going to be a lot of vacancies coming up. That seems to be a lot of people on here who would do it better... or at least think they would do it better.
skintsaint Posted 5 minutes ago Posted 5 minutes ago Will probably put him on suspended leave until the FA hearing. If banned then sacked, if not he comes back. Unfortunately, that would put AL in charge in the meantime, unless we can get an old duffer like Hodgson to come in for a few months.
BarberSaint Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago 6 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said: Because of his actions, a decent side will be broken up, we lost the chance of promotion & could face further charges & scrutiny. It’s unbelievable people think he should keep his job after that monumental mistake. Unlike Bielsa he didn’t take accountability for this from the off. It looks like he lied by pretending he thought it wasn’t illegal. Why did he think Salt objected to doing it against Ipswich, because he had a haircut that day he didn’t want to miss? The avatar's getting old. As are you. Retire. (with all those pints you'll never find a use for).
Saint86 Posted just now Posted just now 50 minutes ago, SaintsLoyal said: Show me a player that would play for Eckert EVER again ! I expect most of our squad want his head on a stick for whats happened and rightly so. Let's surmise again for those that can't process bielsa did more "spying" (scouting) than Eckert did. Players pre Eckert - relegation scrap. Players post Eckert - one of the all time best championship sides. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now