Dman Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Thought I’d give him a thread of his own for the Google algorithm, for any future employment background searches. Grassing rat who squirrels company information onto personal devices to use against them. Not to be trusted and on top of that, not very good at his job, hence why he was sacked after a few months. 16
wild-saint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Fucking amateur that a business the size of Southampton has a IT / Data Leak Protection policies allowing either internal information to be transferred to personal devices and / or allows company devices / employees to use application not controlled by them such as fucking WhatsApp. i say it again it’s fucking amateur. I warn my clients about this shit for exactly these reasons. If the aren’t interested in fixing the processes then they ain’t my clients much longer. Fucking amateur. 2
The Wyvern Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 38 minutes ago, Dman said: Thought I’d give him a thread of his own for the Google algorithm, for any future employment background searches. Grassing rat who squirrels company information onto personal devices to use against them. Not to be trusted and on top of that, not very good at his job, hence why he was sacked after a few months. You’d think future employers would think twice about giving him a chance, no way he could be trusted.
chownie20 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Perhaps he can be held personally liable - we don't know what he did and didn't sign. But not sure what we'd gain by going after him. Imagine he'll struggle for work with that on his cv
Secret Site Agent Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago He has ruined his career as no one will trust him again. They will always be wary on what material he is collecting on them for the future. Better to not employ than risk him taking your dirty laundry with him. All companies do dodgy things and get away with a lot but no one wants to trust someone with no loyalty. He won't be appreciated by Boro now the event is over only eyed with suspicion. He can benefit them no more. And where did it get them? No where in the scheme of things. Take what will benefit you and use it but keep it to yourself. 1
benjii Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, wild-saint said: Fucking amateur that a business the size of Southampton has a IT / Data Leak Protection policies allowing either internal information to be transferred to personal devices and / or allows company devices / employees to use application not controlled by them such as fucking WhatsApp. i say it again it’s fucking amateur. I warn my clients about this shit for exactly these reasons. If the aren’t interested in fixing the processes then they ain’t my clients much longer. Fucking amateur. To be fair, whilst you're correct, it is not at all uncommon, even in much larger businesses. 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago When Boro spit him out, I wonder how trustworthy others will think is. 1
Saint86 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) I believe this is the accused / suspected: https://www.transfermarkt.com/jason-taylor/profil/trainer/126892#google_vignette Pretty sure it is him (the whistleblower), I looked him up as soon as it was rumoured we'd hired an analyst from Boro and got rid of them in December - which was only a couple of days after this story broke and before his name got leaked, and already he has deleted his linked in profile... Why delete your linked in profile before your name is even out there? Equally, fits in with how Boro had the limited but necessary minimum information available to stitch saints up from the get go - "look out for salt" and the details of the Oxford incident, both reported on 7th may. Suspect Salt gave us up for the Eastleigh / Ipswich incident to save his own skin after the fact - as Taylor wouldn't have known about that. (The dates in the EFL report show that the initial incident Ipswich knew about in advance was the Oxford incident, which was just before we sacked Taylor / Taylor left the club). It's reported that Ipswich and Oxford didn't know they were scouted inside the cut off window. So surely has to have come from whistleblowers in both occasions. Also, if these are the only 2 dates provided using whistleblower testimonies, it may not be as wide spread as fans think - which in turn means it's not as bad as the bielsa case. Certainly training ground privacy has improved a lot in recent years. Edited 1 hour ago by Saint86 2
AlexLaw76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Imagine the scenes if Taylor was still in the 'SFC Group Chat' after he left 🤣
coalman Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Dman said: Thought I’d give him a thread of his own for the Google algorithm, for any future employment background searches. Grassing rat who squirrels company information onto personal devices to use against them. Not to be trusted and on top of that, not very good at his job, hence why he was sacked after a few months. Except he can trigger his Right to be Forgotten under EU law to have this removed from any search rankings.
Dman Posted 45 minutes ago Author Posted 45 minutes ago The worst part of it all, he’s probably cost a few of his ex colleagues, who’ll be low paid, their jobs. Scumbag. 2
AlexLaw76 Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Dman said: The worst part of it all, he’s probably cost a few of his ex colleagues, who’ll be low paid, their jobs. Scumbag. And now Boro failed (for the 3rd time) to gain promotion, to what end was this worth it? It wont be long before he is spat out up there anyway. 1
Miltonaggro Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago When he is binned by Gibson as a single use contraceptive it would be really bad form for Saints fans to warn all potential employers that he is a corrupt snide. All being well he will be analysing in the Qatari third division soon, whilst being analised by the adoring locals. 2
The Wyvern Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago Can’t be beyond the imagination that Gibson offered this lad some kind of incentive to make any future negative impacts on his career worthwhile.
Dman Posted 21 minutes ago Author Posted 21 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, The Wyvern said: Can’t be beyond the imagination that Gibson offered this lad some kind of incentive to make any future negative impacts on his career worthwhile. Incredibly dodgy ground if so.
SaintsLoyal Posted 21 minutes ago Posted 21 minutes ago So i will add on this thread what i said elsewhere....... Did Taylor get the sack becuase he wouldnt spy or be involved in spying as a analyst team ? Did Taylor entice Salt to spy and then simmply tip off Boro that a spy from Southampton would be coming. Does Taylor realise what now could happen to WIll Salt for his revenge ? mental health , suicide etc
Dman Posted 19 minutes ago Author Posted 19 minutes ago 1 minute ago, SaintsLoyal said: So i will add on this thread what i said elsewhere....... Did Taylor get the sack becuase he wouldnt spy or be involved in spying as a analyst team ? Did Taylor entice Salt to spy and then simmply tip off Boro that a spy from Southampton would be coming. Does Taylor realise what now could happen to WIll Salt for his revenge ? mental health , suicide etc Wasn’t he set piece analyst and didn’t we have one of the worst set piece records in the league at the time?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now