Jump to content

Financial Results 22/23

EBS1980

By EBS1980,
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, EBS1980 said:

a review of our 22/23 accounts here. Made a loss of £87M in our relegation year.

still owe £93M on player purchases but only due £4M on player sales 😬

A possible £62M also due in add ons for player purchases 


https://x.com/kieranmaguire/status/1764534233710702707?s=46&t=OQrvtqxdga34G9SV_nKtNQ

You can see why SR wanted to recoup as much money as possible last Summer, and didn't want to lay out much on new purchases. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Barsiem

Barsiem

Posted
Posted

Not really surprising. We spend £100m on new players that year.  Recouped most of that through sales this year so hopefully we're ok, but who knows with football finances 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Barsiem said:

Not really surprising. We wasted £100m on new players that year.  Recouped most of that through sales this year so hopefully we're ok, but who knows with football finances 

corrected it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, EBS1980 said:

a review of our 22/23 accounts here. Made a loss of £87M in our relegation year.

still owe £93M on player purchases but only due £4M on player sales 😬

A possible £62M also due in add ons for player purchases 


https://x.com/kieranmaguire/status/1764534233710702707?s=46&t=OQrvtqxdga34G9SV_nKtNQ

our finances weren't broken so we broke them

  • Like 1
  • Haha 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Orsic too... what a mess...

There are some signings that just don’t make sense from the footballing view. Sometimes the only explanation is that the money involved sloshes around the international transfer market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
disconnect

disconnect

Posted
Posted

I think we've probably rectified some of it this season, but doesn't sound great. Orsic and Onuachu complete wastes of money.

For comparison, presumably Leeds having made a loss on transfers the last 3 seasons is pretty bad too - £59m loss (21/22), £37m loss (22/23) and £2m loss this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, disconnect said:

I think we've probably rectified some of it this season, but doesn't sound great. Orsic and Onuachu complete wastes of money.

For comparison, presumably Leeds having made a loss on transfers the last 3 seasons is pretty bad too - £59m loss (21/22), £37m loss (22/23) and £2m loss this season. 

The silver lining is we've been saved by our sales in the summer. Goodness knows what we would have done without the wedge we got for Lavia and Livramento. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, CB Fry said:

It means we need to get promoted this year. Not “well we did quite well considering”.

Yeah, but given how much of a fanfare was made of it, the 25 game unbeaten run will count for something if we don't get promoted, surely...? ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

How much in wages do we think we'll get off the P&L this Summer? 

Will the wages for the people on loan count? I suppose the positive of the is if it's really bad we can just let them leave without replacement and we immediately lose the wage burden. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Will the wages for the people on loan count? I suppose the positive of the is if it's really bad we can just let them leave without replacement and we immediately lose the wage burden. 

I would assume a proportion of it will - I wouldn't have thought teams are paying the full amount of wages - but also we have quite a few players out of contract that are on high wages (McCarthy, Adams, Armstrong), so on their own that's approx £10m pa. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted (edited)

We have debts of £116m that need to be paid in next 12 months and a further £95m that does not need to be paid back this year.  A further £62m may have to be paid out depending (mostly) on appearances.

We have about £14m in the bank and we are owed another £24m. Accounts doesn't include players sales (and expenditure) during the summer.

Dragon pumped £85m into the club via a share issue.

We paid £18m of interest (on bank loan and transfers). That's £350,000 a week.

Wage bill was £106m (plus £15m N.I costs).

 

 

Edited by Chez
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bpsaint

bpsaint

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chez said:

We have debts of £116m that need to be paid in next 12 months and a further £95m that does need to be paid back this year.  A further £62m may have to be paid out depending (mostly) on appearances.

We have about £14m in the bank and we are owed another £24m. Accounts doesn't include players sales (and expenditure) during the summer.

Dragon pumped £85m into the club via a share issue.

We paid £18m of interest (on bank loan and transfers). That's £350,000 a week.

Wage bill was £106m (plus £15m N.I costs).

 

 

So what you’re saying is if we don’t go up this year we’re pretty fucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Chez said:

We have debts of £116m that need to be paid in next 12 months and a further £95m that does need to be paid back this year.  A further £62m may have to be paid out depending (mostly) on appearances.

We have about £14m in the bank and we are owed another £24m. Accounts doesn't include players sales (and expenditure) during the summer.

Dragon pumped £85m into the club via a share issue.

We paid £18m of interest (on bank loan and transfers). That's £350,000 a week.

Wage bill was £106m (plus £15m N.I costs).

 

 

I would assume the sales last Summer should cover a lot of the next years liabilities. 

Tbf, this club's awful transfer record over the last 5 years has really come back to bite.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, bpsaint said:

So what you’re saying is if we don’t go up this year we’re pretty fucked.

I am mindful of a scene in the film Interstella where Cooper says: What happens if he blows the airlock?

TARS replies: Nothing good.

That said, the figures look bad because we spent a shit load in January to try and keep us up - that we wouldn't have spent otherwise. The player sales this summer were significant though and next years accounts will show where we really stand.  The covid loan still hangs over us and is growing (by £10m this year). It looks like £41m of it will have to be paid off within this financial year. That's a big number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint86

Saint86

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

You can see why SR wanted to recoup as much money as possible last Summer, and didn't want to lay out much on new purchases. 

I mean, pretty much all self inflicted by Sports Republic. Imagine another scenario where they'd not undermined and sacked Ralph (the best manager of their tenure by far), and instead actually gone out and purchased a striker for circa £30M. Actually, i'm not fussy, Openda for £6-8M would have done that summer.... Now granted, thats just one of many possible futures that would have likely seen us still in the premier league - and with a a far better outlook for the years ahead than we have now 😰

....

Woops.

Ah well, its fun being the top dogs in the 2nd tier, seeing all our best players and academy prospects being poached, and gradually losing our competitive edge the longer we stay down here 🤣

Edited by Saint86
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Miltonaggro

Miltonaggro

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

The silver lining is we've been saved by our sales in the summer. Goodness knows what we would have done without the wedge we got for Lavia and Livramento. 

We’d have to have sold Che Adams. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Saint86 said:

I mean, pretty much all self inflicted by Sports Republic. Imagine another scenario where they'd not undermined and sacked Ralph (the best manager of their tenure by far), and instead actually gone out and purchased a striker for circa £30M. Actually, i'm not fussy, Openda for £6-8M would have done that summer.... Now granted, thats just one of many possible futures that would have likely seen us still in the premier league - and with a a far better outlook for the years ahead than we have now 😰

....

Woops.

Ah well, its fun being the top dogs in the 2nd tier, seeing all our best players and academy prospects being poached, and gradually losing our competitive edge the longer we stay down here 🤣

I'm enjoying this season more than any season since Koeman tbf. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harry_SFC

Harry_SFC

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SaintsLoyal said:

Amazing the club are going to spend a hefty wedge on alleged ground improvements that simply don’t need to be done.

the commercial revenue is woeful as well.

The commercial revenue has been dreadful for years now. You'd like to think Parsons is really looking at this..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doctoroncall

Doctoroncall

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Farmer Saint said:

I'm enjoying this season more than any season since Koeman tbf. 

The trouble is these types of seasons will not last in Championship when the parachute payments end and the EFL FFP rules kick in. There will be more adjustment needed in types of players Saints would be able to afford and keep so Say goodbye to the KWPs, hello to more of the Mannings and Any decent young prospect being bought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, Doctoroncall said:

The trouble is these types of seasons will not last in Championship when the parachute payments end and the EFL FFP rules kick in. There will be more adjustment needed in types of players Saints would be able to afford and keep so Say goodbye to the KWPs, hello to more of the Mannings and Any decent young prospect being bought. 

Oh absolutely, the same as being at the bottom end of the PL. We always lose decent young prospects. 

But yes, I know what you're saying - however in a vacuum I am really enjoying this year, and that's what enjoying football is about. 

Edited by Farmer Saint
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Mixedkebab said:

If we do go up SR will have to spend about £100m to have a chance of staying up.
 

 

Doubt we'll be able to...looking at those numbers, even with what we've brought in this season in transfers we may still fall should of FFP. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint86

Saint86

Posted
Posted (edited)

FFP / PSR is a sham in any case. It exists solely to cement the top clubs in near unassailable positions, with commercial revenues far in excess of anything upstart clubs can muster, and with almost guaranteed access to the UEFA millions as well.

We got screwed by the big clubs before, Leicester at least got Champions League money and a league title before eventually falling away, and Brighton will be the next team to be stripped and sent packing.

Clubs like Newcastle and Villa (with mega rich owners that can underwrite any debts) will not be allowed to threaten the established elite (unlike City, Chelsea, Blackburn etc did historically), and its all out of fear of the big clubs breaking away to form a super league. Meanwhile Uefa have essentially created one anyway with their new champions league, and all that is really happening is an ever greater long term competitive divide between the top 5-6 clubs and the rest of the league. Just look at united, shite for years, minimal prize money domestically or continentally, awful transfer business over nearly a decade... and yet Villa dare to have one expensive summer and they face being slapped down, whilst United have an uncompetitive spend which is protected almost indefinitely because of their established "big club" commercial clout.

If they don't rebalance these finances controls fairly, they'll kill football for most people.

Edited by Saint86
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Charlie Wayman

Charlie Wayman

Posted
Posted (edited)

Some clubs live beyond their means just as some people live beyond their means. External controls are necessary because these clubs and people seemingly can't help themselves. The whole point of regulation is to curb their excesses and return them to a sustainable pathway.  The temptations are self evident for both. 

It helps nobody if clubs end up destitute or going out of business. The Premier League financial model is deeply flawed and is in danger of spiralling out of control. There is mounting evidence that a tipping point is fast approaching. Lower wages and lower transfer fees must be the goal but how you get there is problematic.  

Edited by Charlie Wayman
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gingeletiss

Gingeletiss

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Charlie Wayman said:

Some clubs live beyond their means just as some people live beyond their means. External controls are necessary because these clubs and people seemingly can't help themselves. The whole point of regulation is to curb their excesses and return them to a sustainable pathway.  The temptations are self evident for both. 

It helps nobody if clubs end up destitute or going out of business. The Premier League financial model is deeply flawed and is in danger of spiralling out of control. There is mounting evidence that a tipping point is fast approaching. Lower wages and lower transfer fees must be the goal but how you get there is problematic.  

Lower wages, lower transfer fees, simple, works in other sports and countries. Set a wage limit, then set a limit each club can spend. I know the Aleague is championship standard, but it works for them. The football authorities need to act now, as you said, the tipping point is here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gingeletiss said:

Lower wages, lower transfer fees, simple, works in other sports and countries. Set a wage limit, then set a limit each club can spend. I know the Aleague is championship standard, but it works for them. The football authorities need to act now, as you said, the tipping point is here.

But obviously you can't do that around the world? So it just means any decent player will go and play in another country. 

In no sports do you have a wage limit for players. You have salary caps for the whole club, which could work, but then you need a full re-structure on transfer fees (ie get rid of them), young talent - essentially you would need a worldwide adoption of the NFL model,which is just not possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gingeletiss

Gingeletiss

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

But obviously you can't do that around the world? So it just means any decent player will go and play in another country. 

In no sports do you have a wage limit for players. You have salary caps for the whole club, which could work, but then you need a full re-structure on transfer fees (ie get rid of them), young talent - essentially you would need a worldwide adoption of the NFL model,which is just not possible. 

You sort of can, if FIFA had any balls, if they made that the rule, then all those under their umbrella would have to abide by it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ally_uk

ally_uk

Posted
Posted

What I don't understand is the likes of Everton have been deducted points... 

Surely City and the likes or Chelsea should be relegated? How do they continue to get away with it? 

That's why I couldn't give a damm if we go into the Premier league it's corrupt to the core. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})

  I accept