Gloucester Saint Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Shows how well Martin did with us tbh. Nathan Wood is HIS signing so not sure how you reached that conclusion 😀 Ankerson’s transfer tavern special Ronnie ‘I saw Jack the Hat get shot in the Blind Beggar’ Edwards is even worse if anything. Edited 11 hours ago by Gloucester Saint
trousers Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Farmer Saint said: Shows how well Martin did with us tbh. House! 2
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Osvaldorama said: We literally don’t have a midfield Nope. No DM (it's never Charles) No creative attacking midfielder. Just some central midfielders to move the ball about, in Downes (invariably backwards), Charles (usually sideways) and Smallbone (5 yards distance, but across the pitch). Like our attacking width, every player we have is really going for 1 position.
SaintNewForest Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 49 minutes ago, saintant said: I'm sure Spors has everything in hand. Remember, squad building is an art form that only becomes obvious at the end. 1
Monk Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I'd love to see if WS would be setting up different or changing quicker if his brothers were in his staff. I guess we'll never know.
Umlaut Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 1 minute ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: Nope. No DM (it's never Charles) No creative attacking midfielder. Just some central midfielders to move the ball about, in Downes (invariably backwards), Charles (usually sideways) and Smallbone (5 yards distance, but across the pitch). Like our attacking width, every player we have is really going for 1 position. If only, he's giving it straight to Norwich Edited 11 hours ago by Umlaut
washsaint Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago This is as embarrassing a performance a I have seen from Saints (and yes, that includes he 9-0s). THis is a performance without any saving graces (except Fraser and McCarthy). Will Still will start getting pelters in the near future if we persists with this shit style and line-up. Every time we've played this season with 5 at the back we've looked comical with no midfield. An absolute joke of a performance and awful, awful tactics. 1
Colinjb Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Great pressure from Roerslev, Archer, no confidence to hit it first time, lost the space by the time of the second touch.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Norwich mess. But a perfect ball for an AA effort. But it's Archer, so....
macca155 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago The Archer we bought, shoots on sight there. What have we done to him 1
qwertyell Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: Wtf has happened to Edwards? Were QPR fans just lying about how good he was last season? Depends on if you think being named QPR's (finishing position: 15th) young player of the year means anything. For context, the winner for the previous two seasons was prolific striker Sinclair Armstrong for scoring 4 in 40 (23/24) and 0 in 24 (22/23). He's since joined Bristol City (3 in 38 in 24/25). 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Monk said: I'd love to see if WS would be setting up different or changing quicker if his brothers were in his staff. I guess we'll never know. If his brothers could play on the wing, they'd be starting. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, SaintNewForest said: Remember, squad building is an art form that only becomes obvious at the end. Fart form more like. With a lot of shit following at the end. 1
Farmer Saint Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, washsaint said: This is as embarrassing a performance a I have seen from Saints (and yes, that includes he 9-0s). THis is a performance without any saving graces (except Fraser and McCarthy). Will Still will start getting pelters in the near future if we persists with this shit style and line-up. Every time we've played this season with 5 at the back we've looked comical with no midfield. An absolute joke of a performance and awful, awful tactics. Agreed, I remember when we lost those two games 9-0 I was sat there thinking "At least we're not drawing 0-0 at Carrow Road." 1 6
sockeye Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, sockeye said: Yet he had players suited to his system like Downes and Smallbone. Just thought I'd expand on this, sorry. He had players bought to be suited to his system like Downes, and players like Smallbone that were already in the squad. Still has had players such as Sulemana, Edozie and Dibling, immediately sold or frozen out of the squad to be sold. Not that his lauded pragmatism has particularly come out this season, but the board (and the club) set up Martin better from the start. 2
Gloucester Saint Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 2 minutes ago, macca155 said: The Archer we bought, shoots on sight there. What have we done to him The Rylan effect
Greedyfly Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, macca155 said: The Archer we bought, shoots on sight there. What have we done to him The Archer we bought is the same cart horse as the one on the pitch. He's another 'always been terd thus still is terd' which appears to be our transfer strategy. 1
captainchris Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 minutes ago, LGTL said: New RB looks alright to be fair. Really…. Not so sure
Saint_clark Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 minutes ago, washsaint said: This is as embarrassing a performance a I have seen from Saints (and yes, that includes he 9-0s). THis is a performance without any saving graces (except Fraser and McCarthy). Will Still will start getting pelters in the near future if we persists with this shit style and line-up. Every time we've played this season with 5 at the back we've looked comical with no midfield. An absolute joke of a performance and awful, awful tactics. Give it a rest. This isn't even close to being a bad performance by our standards. 4
Tauro Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) The quality we have going forward is top notch Edited 10 hours ago by Tauro
benjii Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: That he needs two wingers - it's why he is constantly mentioning it. Fraser and Edozie. Robinson. Armstrong. Done.
Saint NL Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago What accent does this commentator have? It seems to change every 5 mins
Bakovnetski Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, LGTL said: Had high hopes for Still but this level of woefulness can’t be ignored too much longer. That's because FM defaults to player strengths and not when they're having a shit day and don't respond to the keyboard Edited 11 hours ago by Bakovnetski
Saint Matty 76 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Proper finish that. Definitely our best striker.
davefizzy14 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago (edited) Archer 😊 get in! Stunning finish Edited 10 hours ago by davefizzy14
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, Saint_clark said: Give it a rest. This isn't even close to being a bad performance by our standards. 'Tis but a scratch of incompetence! Come back here and watch our defenders collide into each other again! 🙂
Osvaldorama Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago That’s a fantastic finish fair play. Hes been good tonight 1
Greedyfly Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Greedyfly said: The Archer we bought is the same cart horse as the one on the pitch. He's another 'always been terd thus still is terd' which appears to be our transfer strategy. Aged like out of date milk 🤣 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now