Jump to content

Should Saints sack Tonda?  

249 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Saints sack Tonda over "Spygate"?



Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm in favour of keeping him. The spying was a terrible idea and a badly executed one but the punishment has been disproportionate and the media have blown the whole thing up bigger than it needed to be. 

  • Like 8
Posted

He's been successful (apart from the amateurish espionage) IF he still commandes the backing of the players I think he should stay. Sacking him would be shooting ourselves in the foot. Nobody beyond Saints fans will remember this spying in 6 months time.

  • Like 7
Posted
3 hours ago, trousers said:

Yeah, fair point... I guess 'coercion' is indeed a potential differential here... Damn...! 

If Salt was coerced and bullied to the extent he claims, it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that there may have been a potential “plea bargain” or “saving one’s own arse” that came into play here. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, saint michael said:

Hackney not play was an advantage but planning for him playing or not playing should have been standard stuff and available from previous games they played with and without. Didn’t need spying to confirm this 

Why the fuck did that prick send the lad up there then!

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Why the fuck did that prick send the lad up there then!

Exactly. I think it’s ridiculous too.  Use data by all means but if he couldn’t work out what they would do with or without says more about him. 

Posted

I voted for Tonda to be sacked but that is based on the whole thing starting and ending with Tonda. If it comes to light that it started above Tonda then that changes things.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Saint Billy said:

I voted for Tonda to be sacked but that is based on the whole thing starting and ending with Tonda. If it comes to light that it started above Tonda then that changes things.

Well you can be sure it wasn’t Tonda who signed off his expenses claims……

Posted

If the FA ban him for say 6 months or more, or indeed any ban save for about 14 days, surely the club will not pack him off somewhere for a placement elsewhere until his ban is over? This all ends of course if the players want shot of him which begs the question that as he’s still here and I’m assuming the players’ opinions have been collected, there must be a decent rump of the squad who are standing by him. I know that THB posted that piccie yesterday of the bottle and his pint, and in itself that was quite simple stuff, you don’t do that if you do hate the club and its manager and you want out now.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Because of his actions, a decent side will be broken up, we lost the chance of promotion & could face further charges & scrutiny. It’s unbelievable people think he should keep his job after that monumental mistake.
 

Unlike Bielsa he didn’t take accountability for this from the off. It looks like he lied by pretending he thought it wasn’t illegal. Why did he think Salt objected to doing it against Ipswich, because he had a haircut that day he didn’t want to miss? 

Edited by Lord Duckhunter
  • Like 3
Posted

Forgive if already been posted but there is a very good article in the Times today on him and about spying on teams and a bit more about who he is and his background. As Crab lungs says it will be useful to hear him before he is hung out to dry. Not saying it changes views but may help with the emotional bit of the effect of what he has done. 
 

I cant post the article as was shared by a friend and supporter of another club who is seething by the way the saints have been treated. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Because of his actions, a decent side will be broken up, we lost the chance of promotion & could face further charges & scrutiny. It’s unbelievable people think he should keep his job after that monumental mistake.
 

Unlike Bielsa he didn’t take accountability for this from the off. It looks like he lied by pretending he thought it wasn’t illegal. Why did he think Salt objected to doing it against Ipswich, because he had a haircut that day he didn’t want to miss? 

Because of his actions, we moved from relegation fodder to the play offs. The decent side only came into existence when he took over. Before that, it was a collection of players who either didn’t know what was required or couldn't be arsed to do it. 

Some players will leave, but some players would have left anyway had we finished mid-table or, worse, got relegated. The only chance we had of keeping our best players was to get promoted and we looked nowhere near doing that halfway through the season.

Edited by DellBlockH
  • Like 1
Posted

I hope someone is still keeping the Tonda bus maintained. I want to see it fired back up in a couple of months. With bigger wheels and less professional recording equipment.

Posted
13 minutes ago, DellBlockH said:

Because of his actions, we moved from relegation fodder to the play offs. The decent side only came into existence when he took over. Before that, it was a collection of players who either didn’t know what was required or couldn't be arsed to do it. 

Some players will leave, but some players would have left anyway had we finished mid-table or, worse, got relegated. The only chance we had of keeping our best players was to get promoted and we looked nowhere near doing that halfway through the season.

Any competent manager would have had our squad in the mix for promotion 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, DellBlockH said:

Because of his actions, we moved from relegation fodder to the play offs. The decent side only came into existence when he took over. Before that, it was a collection of players who either didn’t know what was required or couldn't be arsed to do it. 

Some players will leave, but some players would have left anyway had we finished mid-table or, worse, got relegated. The only chance we had of keeping our best players was to get promoted and we looked nowhere near doing that halfway through the season.

Before that we were managed by an idiot who didn’t know his arse from his elbow.  Half the supporters would have done a better job than Will fucking Still just by going 4 at the back.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Before that we were managed by an idiot who didn’t know his arse from his elbow.  Half the supporters would have done a better job than Will fucking Still just by going 4 at the back.

Any idiot could see we needed to ditch 3 at the back. The results did not change much with To da whilst he was persisting with that

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Because of his actions, a decent side will be broken up, we lost the chance of promotion & could face further charges & scrutiny. It’s unbelievable people think he should keep his job after that monumental mistake.
 

Unlike Bielsa he didn’t take accountability for this from the off. It looks like he lied by pretending he thought it wasn’t illegal. Why did he think Salt objected to doing it against Ipswich, because he had a haircut that day he didn’t want to miss? 

Thanks to Parsons fessing up like a naughty schoolgirl the club had no choice but to batten down the hatches and attempt to control what was an utter shitshow. Tonda was part of it yes, but he’s no child killer FFS. Accountability starts at the top.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Before that we were managed by an idiot who didn’t know his arse from his elbow.  Half the supporters would have done a better job than Will fucking Still just by going 4 at the back.

I think it’s easy to trivialise the turnaround - it’s not as simple as going to a back four. We were in a fucking tailspin with the pilot in a coma - make no mistake. He turned things around both in terms of personnel and tactics. Credit where credits due.

Posted
Just now, Saint Fan CaM said:

I think it’s easy to trivialise the turnaround - it’s not as simple as going to a back four. We were in a fucking tailspin with the pilot in a coma - make no mistake. He turned things around both in terms of personnel and tactics. Credit where credits due.

Back 4, give Peretz and Larin plus spying every other week.

Will Still would have loved that 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Back 4, give Peretz and Larin plus spying every other week.

Will Still would have loved that 

Revisionist fucking nonsense

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...