sadoldgit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Charlie Wayman said: If our aim is to build a side that can stay in and compete in the PL should we win promotion, then the last thing we need is to waste our very limited resources on bringing back a 32 yo Ward Prowse for largely sentimental reasons. He has no future value to the club, will be over the hill soon if not already and lacks the athleticism that will be essential in midfield to compete at the higher level and even at thios level. It's all very well pointing to his considerable experience in the PL and free kick record but more recently he has failed to cut the mustard at WHU, Notts F or Burnley. Why do people on here expect anything to be different if he re-joined Saints? It won't. We don't need a geriatric passenger who happens to take free kicks well, we have one of those already. Worse still he will be blocking the progress of youngsters like Akachukwu and our youngsters is where our future must lie. Signing JWP will be a munumental folly that we must not commit or will come to regret. Why do you think we are signing him for sentimental reasons? We are picking up a decent EPL player for peanuts. He is fit, experienced, has a good engine and will be a godsend to Larin. Good bit of business I think. As for next season, as said already, we need to get promoted first. All the forward planning in the world won’t mean a thing if we don’t go up. 4
Patrick Bateman Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: Tbf, for £800k and a reduced wages, if that’s true, it’s a no brainer. Hope he scores a free kick against West Ham now Agreed - it's not a huge amount of cash for a very experienced pro.
Chez Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, The Kraken said: Hopefully so. It was rumoured he was on £100K - £120K a week when signing for WH. It's also rumoured that WH players have endured a 50% relegation clause, so current earnings £50K-£60K a week at a guess. Which is too high, I'd say, even for 2 years. I have no evidence for this whatsoever, but it's not inconceivable that the £1M or so fee to WH could be going directly to JWP from them as a payment to consolidate the lesser wages he'll be earning here for his final year. So bringing him 'down' to about £40K a week which supposedly some other of our players are on. Dunno, just throwing it out there. I was going to post the same thing. Although if the £1m was going from us to West Ham and then to him as a pay off, would it not have made more sense for West Ham to let him go for nothing and then the million is paid to him by Saints as a signing on bonus that covers that reduction in wage for the first year? If we are paying West Ham a £1m transfer fee AND him the same £50-60k a week wage, then I think we are overpaying. We should have loaned him for a year and squeezed West Ham to pay maybe £20k a week of the £50-60k wages. Perhaps that was never going to happen and we have got ourselves a quality player for next to nothing. Time will tell.
revolution saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Think I mentioned when the idea of a JWP return was first brought up that I thought he'd be OK but fairly uninspiring and that still holds true but I'm trying to look on the positive aspects. He'll run all day long, he'll be available most of the time, he'll be dangerous on set pieces, he's still probably more of a goal threat from open play than our other midfielders (unless you count Azaz which I'm not), he should be more than capable of handling the pace of the championship. Then there's the intangibles - experience, good example to the rest of the side and he actually wants to be here. He's not the ball carrying dynamic midfielder I was hoping for but he still improves the squad and is relatively low risk (as much as any transfer can be low risk). Was trying to think of how many of the squad would have played with him outside of that very short stint in the championship before he got sold. I came up with Stephens, Bazunu, Larios, Edozie and Bree for half a season. How mental is that? Bazunu, Edozie and Larios are our joint second longest serving players.
Midfield_General Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago SLAPHAMPTON: 3-5-2 Rosler Boa Morte Marsden Smallbone De Ridder Romeu Chaplow D. Armstrong Thomas Higginbotham Caballero Subs: Keller, Williams, Belmadi, Draper, Ings (despite pretending otherwise) Way too many midfielders. That squad has got about as much balance as it has need for conditioner 1 3
Cascadia Saint Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago West Ham basically loaned him for 3 years for 30 million on massively inflated wages and barely played him. Love it. I'd be happy to have him back. 1
Patrick Bateman Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Midfield_General said: SLAPHAMPTON: 3-5-2 Rosler Boa Morte Marsden Smallbone De Ridder Romeu Chaplow D. Armstrong Thomas Higginbotham Caballero Subs: Keller, Williams, Belmadi, Draper, Ings (despite pretending otherwise) Way too many midfielders. That squad has got about as much balance as it has need for conditioner The Ings one made me laugh out loud, brilliant 1 1
Saint86 Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago Probably a degree of, "if I'm playing in the championship, then I'm doing it at saints" to the whole thing. Clearly been rumbling for a while given the early noises made by Blackmore at the start of the summer.
Saint86 Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: SLAPHAMPTON: 3-5-2 Rosler Boa Morte Marsden Smallbone De Ridder Romeu Chaplow D. Armstrong Thomas Higginbotham Caballero Subs: Keller, Williams, Belmadi, Draper, Ings (despite pretending otherwise) Way too many midfielders. That squad has got about as much balance as it has need for conditioner You'll be able to add scienza soon, maybe by the end of the season the rate his is thinning 😆 2
Turkish Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago (edited) 12 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: SLAPHAMPTON: 3-5-2 Rosler Boa Morte Marsden Smallbone De Ridder Romeu Chaplow D. Armstrong Thomas Higginbotham Caballero Subs: Keller, Williams, Belmadi, Draper, Ings (despite pretending otherwise) Way too many midfielders. That squad has got about as much balance as it has need for conditioner David Armstrong at lB?Call yourself a fan Edited 33 minutes ago by Turkish
hypochondriac Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: SLAPHAMPTON: 3-5-2 Rosler Boa Morte Marsden Smallbone De Ridder Romeu Chaplow D. Armstrong Thomas Higginbotham Caballero Subs: Keller, Williams, Belmadi, Draper, Ings (despite pretending otherwise) Way too many midfielders. That squad has got about as much balance as it has need for conditioner Kasey Keller was getting there as well.
BarberSaint Posted 28 minutes ago Posted 28 minutes ago 5 hours ago, Graffito said: Agree re pace not being essential for a CM. The weakness I saw in his game is that he was slow on the turn and sometimes got caught square to his man so players went past him. Always thought that was something that could be addressed with coaching. Haven’t seen enough of him recently to know whether he’s improved it. Well he's 31, hardly played and Jack Stephens' failures have been evident since he was about 18. I'd say he's worse than he was, he might have a couple of good-ish games in the beginning but after that it'll be the same old and his corners will still be shit.
Midfield_General Posted 21 minutes ago Posted 21 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, Turkish said: David Armstrong at lB?Call yourself a fan Well now "He was equally at home as a box-to-box midfielder with an eye for goal or, if needed, a steady left-back, a position he filled more as he turned 30" Not just a left back, but a steady one. Not that the casual armchair fan would know that https://www.saintsplayers.co.uk/player/dave-armstrong/ 2
Turkish Posted 19 minutes ago Posted 19 minutes ago (edited) 15 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: Well now "He was equally at home as a box-to-box midfielder with an eye for goal or, if needed, a steady left-back, a position he filled more as he turned 30" Not just a left back, but a steady one. Not that the casual armchair fan would know that https://www.saintsplayers.co.uk/player/dave-armstrong/ To be fair football wasn’t invented until 1992 so you can’t expect anyone to know much about anyone before then Edited 5 minutes ago by Turkish 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 16 minutes ago Posted 16 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: Well now "He was equally at home as a box-to-box midfielder with an eye for goal or, if needed, a steady left-back, a position he filled more as he turned 30" Not just a left back, but a steady one. Not that the casual armchair fan would know that https://www.saintsplayers.co.uk/player/dave-armstrong/ *he did fall out with Chris Nicholl for a time at being used at LB though.. 1
Midfield_General Posted 12 minutes ago Posted 12 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: *he did fall out with Chris Nicholl for a time at being used at LB though.. sssshhhhh don't tell him 2
Cuddles Posted 7 minutes ago Posted 7 minutes ago There's a side benefit for DHGate here too. All those those listings for "Ward-Prowse jersey" will be accurate again. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now