Lord Duckhunter Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, saintant said: The punishment waa clearly way over the top. Far too much self flagelation on here. We've been excessively dealt with so ffs start fighting back instead of meekly submitting and ac epting more pile on. It what way was it over the top? The lack of understanding is incredible. The play offs were ruled to be a separate competition, once the first leg was played there was absolutely no other realistic sporting sanction available. 5 1
trousers Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said: It what way was it over the top? Maybe ask the ex head of the FA (and many other high profile people in the game), who is/are of the same opinion? Or is that too much "whataboutery" for the forum thought police...? Edited 9 hours ago by trousers 10 1
Wade Garrett Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 13 minutes ago, saintant said: The punishment waa clearly way over the top. Far too much self flagelation on here. We've been excessively dealt with so ffs start fighting back instead of meekly submitting and ac epting more pile on. Fight back like cry like a fucking baby over the punishment, that even one of the best lawyers around could do nothing about?
egg Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said: It what way was it over the top? The lack of understanding is incredible. The play offs were ruled to be a separate competition, once the first leg was played there was absolutely no other realistic sporting sanction available. Yep...and the club offered up no credible sanction for the EFL to hit us with...give them the option of expulsion or a fine was inviting expulsion. We had to have a sporting sanction for a sporting offence like that, and the reality is that points wouldn't have hit us, and having not attempted to steer the panel towards something else (EFL cup ban, for example) i can't see that else they could do. It seems like we payed a game of chicken with them, and lost badly. 3
DellBlockH Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 40 minutes ago, CB Fry said: What does "fighting back" actually entail? I guess it starts with accepting the punishment we have received but not adding to it unless forced to by the FA. 3
S-Clarke Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, egg said: Yep...and the club offered up no credible sanction for the EFL to hit us with...give them the option of expulsion or a fine was inviting expulsion. We had to have a sporting sanction for a sporting offence like that, and the reality is that points wouldn't have hit us, and having not attempted to steer the panel towards something else (EFL cup ban, for example) i can't see that else they could do. It seems like we payed a game of chicken with them, and lost badly. That's the key takeaway really. We didn't defend ourselves or offer any form of response to the EFL, we didn't even try to. Some of our antics when we were first charged was school-boy stuff, and the EFL probably made their decision right then. It's the worst defence ever. ''Hi Southampton, we've recieved this complaint - care to comment?'' ''Hi EFL - This isn't true! Us? No! We're good, we don't have things like that happening! This is not the Southampton Way. Nothing to see here" ''Hi Southampton, we have proof that you have done this'' ''Hi EFL - Oh, yeah I think you're right. To help mitigate I'll admit we did it at Oxford and Ipswich too. Can we get a fine and call it a day? I've already had a quiet private chat, outside of this process, with Steve Gibson regarding a financial settlement'' 6
Nordic Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 37 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said: Fight back like cry like a fucking baby over the punishment, that even one of the best lawyers around could do nothing about? No, we fight back by not doing what 100% of Pompey and Boro fans want us to and sacking the best manager we've had for years. It's time to stand up to the pressure from those who don't have our best interests at heart. Edited 8 hours ago by Nordic Saint 14
CB Fry Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) Honestly insane to me that people can only see sacking Tonda as as submissive act that we'd only do because we're weak and its what Pompey or Boro might want us to do. His fuck ups have embarrassed the club, damaged the brand of the club in the community and to sponsors and cost us a very good shot at two hundred odd million quid (and keeping some excellent players). The idea that he could conceivably be manager next season is fucking insane. Every press conference, every i interview, every game is going to be tarnished with this shit. We need to start again. Be strong, take responsibility and clean the club up. That's how we "fight back" for fucks sake. Edited 8 hours ago by CB Fry 11 1
LaptopSaint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago So if I’ve got this right, the Tonda Out crowd want to sack him because he broke the rules, not because of the nature of the punishment. He’s brought shame on the club, and we now need to sit in the stocks and have rotten veg and shit thrown at us. Presumably you’d all think the same if the punishment had been a £2m fine and 6 point penalty, and we’d beaten Hull on Saturday to get promoted. He broke the rules. Fire him. The argument that there was no other sporting sanction available is bollocks. Plenty of people in football who are nothing to do with Saints think the punishment is way over the top. So do plenty of lawyers. And the legal precedent the EFL have now saddled themselves with is crazy. There are practical reasons why we may well have to get rid of Tonda anyway - FA ban or players’ revolt. But we’ve been walked all over once. Let’s not let it happen again. 18 1
BILLYDO1948 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago My reaction to the findings was that the man responsible, Tonda, should carry the can, which would have been a huge loss to us. I thought that, together with fine and points deduction would be enough. The severe penalty of removal from the play off final, in my mind, removed that as an option. If he is sanctioned that’s going to make it very difficult when an FA sweetheart team is found guilty of a similar misdemeanour and, say, sits on top of the league 10 points clear. What would they do?
Ken Tone Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Regardless of whether we should sack eckert, it seems to me that the club don't want to. They could easily have done so by now, citing misconduct, damage to the club's public image etc. Feels like they're waiting to see if he suspended by the FA and if not ..... 1
Harry_SFC Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/tonda-eckert-southampton-spygate-play-offs-dn722kv26 Interesting article in the the times regarding how spying is seen as "the norm" in Germany.
LiberalCommunist Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Weather the storm. Fuck the EFL. Fuck the FA. Lets drop the son in law tag. Fuck 'em. 8
Harry_SFC Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 20 minutes ago, LaptopSaint said: So if I’ve got this right, the Tonda Out crowd want to sack him because he broke the rules, not because of the nature of the punishment. He’s brought shame on the club, and we now need to sit in the stocks and have rotten veg and shit thrown at us. Presumably you’d all think the same if the punishment had been a £2m fine and 6 point penalty, and we’d beaten Hull on Saturday to get promoted. He broke the rules. Fire him. The argument that there was no other sporting sanction available is bollocks. Plenty of people in football who are nothing to do with Saints think the punishment is way over the top. So do plenty of lawyers. And the legal precedent the EFL have now saddled themselves with is crazy. There are practical reasons why we may well have to get rid of Tonda anyway - FA ban or players’ revolt. But we’ve been walked all over once. Let’s not let it happen again. I've not yet spoken to one non Saints fan who thinks we deserved to be kicked out. 10
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, trousers said: I reckon the key factor with all this is going to be how the FA interpret and deal with the "bullying" allegations. In the eyes of the FA, this is essentially what differentiates Eckert's case and Bielsa's (and, I repeat for the umpteenth time... no, it shouldn't matter to the FA that one of the governing body's they oversee have a 72 hour rule on spying and others don't...) So if they sanction Eckert, it'll be due to the additional "bullying" aspect. Regarding that, whilst not wishing to underplay bullying (it's an awful thing to partake in), I do wonder if there's a cultural element at play here. We deal with customers from many nations at my company and when you're dealing with Germans (and the Dutch, and South Africans, to name a few), they typically come across as very terse and even 'rude' in their conversations. But you get used to it because it's 'just the way they are' culturally. Could it be that Tonda's "bullying" is a misinterpretation of him being 'matter of fact' and un-nuanced (a 'lost in translation' kinda thing?) Maybe, maybe not, but it *could* be a mitigating factor, if only partially.... "you vill obey orders"
sadoldgit Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, trousers said: I reckon the key factor with all this is going to be how the FA interpret and deal with the "bullying" allegations. In the eyes of the FA, this is essentially what differentiates Eckert's case and Bielsa's (and, I repeat for the umpteenth time... no, it shouldn't matter to the FA that one of the governing body's they oversee have a 72 hour rule on spying and others don't...) So if they sanction Eckert, it'll be due to the additional "bullying" aspect. Regarding that, whilst not wishing to underplay bullying (it's an awful thing to partake in), I do wonder if there's a cultural element at play here. We deal with customers from many nations at my company and when you're dealing with Germans (and the Dutch, and South Africans, to name a few), they typically come across as very terse and even 'rude' in their conversations. But you get used to it because it's 'just the way they are' culturally. Could it be that Tonda's "bullying" is a misinterpretation of him being 'matter of fact' and un-nuanced (a 'lost in translation' kinda thing?) Maybe, maybe not, but it *could* be a mitigating factor, if only partially.... We have all seen his pressers and his demeanour on the touchline. He is not a touch feely guy and tends to keep his emotions in check. As I have said before, texts can come across as a bit full on, hence emojis. Eckert doesn’t strike me as an emoji guy either, so imagine that this has more to do with how he comes across rather than bullying. 1
Forester Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 47 minutes ago, LaptopSaint said: So if I’ve got this right, the Tonda Out crowd want to sack him because he broke the rules, not because of the nature of the punishment. He’s brought shame on the club, and we now need to sit in the stocks and have rotten veg and shit thrown at us. Presumably you’d all think the same if the punishment had been a £2m fine and 6 point penalty, and we’d beaten Hull on Saturday to get promoted. He broke the rules. Fire him. The argument that there was no other sporting sanction available is bollocks. Plenty of people in football who are nothing to do with Saints think the punishment is way over the top. So do plenty of lawyers. And the legal precedent the EFL have now saddled themselves with is crazy. There are practical reasons why we may well have to get rid of Tonda anyway - FA ban or players’ revolt. But we’ve been walked all over once. Let’s not let it happen again. This is a powerful argument but I draw the opposite conclusion, precisely because of the point you make in penultimate paragraph. I fear he will have lost the magic in the eyes of the players (to say the least), and cannot imagine anything other than a long ban coming up from FA. And so it becomes a bit of a non-choice. 1
Wade Garrett Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 56 minutes ago, Nordic Saint said: No, we fight back by not doing what 100% of Pompey and Boro fans want us to and sacking the best manager we've had for years. It's time to stand up to the pressure from those who don't have our best interests at heart. Totally disagree. 1
Wade Garrett Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 58 minutes ago, S-Clarke said: That's the key takeaway really. We didn't defend ourselves or offer any form of response to the EFL, we didn't even try to. Some of our antics when we were first charged was school-boy stuff, and the EFL probably made their decision right then. It's the worst defence ever. ''Hi Southampton, we've recieved this complaint - care to comment?'' ''Hi EFL - This isn't true! Us? No! We're good, we don't have things like that happening! This is not the Southampton Way. Nothing to see here" ''Hi Southampton, we have proof that you have done this'' ''Hi EFL - Oh, yeah I think you're right. To help mitigate I'll admit we did it at Oxford and Ipswich too. Can we get a fine and call it a day? I've already had a quiet private chat, outside of this process, with Steve Gibson regarding a financial settlement'' The evidence against us was overwhelming. Why can’t people see this? 2
Whitey Grandad Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Wade Garrett said: The evidence against us was overwhelming. Why can’t people see this? It certainly overwhelmed you. 1 8
Wade Garrett Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 53 minutes ago, CB Fry said: Honestly insane to me that people can only see sacking Tonda as as submissive act that we'd only do because we're weak and its what Pompey or Boro might want us to do. His fuck ups have embarrassed the club, damaged the brand of the club in the community and to sponsors and cost us a very good shot at two hundred odd million quid (and keeping some excellent players). The idea that he could conceivably be manager next season is fucking insane. Every press conference, every i interview, every game is going to be tarnished with this shit. We need to start again. Be strong, take responsibility and clean the club up. That's how we "fight back" for fucks sake. This 100%. 2
Wade Garrett Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said: It certainly overwhelmed you. Texts, WhatsApps, photos, witnesses, statements and probably more we don’t know about. So no, it hasn’t fucking overwhelmed me.
pimpin4rizeal Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, CB Fry said: Honestly insane to me that people can only see sacking Tonda as as submissive act that we'd only do because we're weak and its what Pompey or Boro might want us to do. His fuck ups have embarrassed the club, damaged the brand of the club in the community and to sponsors and cost us a very good shot at two hundred odd million quid (and keeping some excellent players). The idea that he could conceivably be manager next season is fucking insane. Every press conference, every i interview, every game is going to be tarnished with this shit. We need to start again. Be strong, take responsibility and clean the club up. That's how we "fight back" for fucks sake. Getting rid of him does nothing good at all fron a football only perspective though does it ? We where only in the play off positions in the first place because of his amazing results, it’s unlikely any other manager woukd have done as well. I find it absurd that fans would rather sack someone who had us going into the play offs 20 games unbeaten just to spin the wheel of fortune on another sports republic managerial decision .. it’s the last year of parachute payments why on earth take that chance when we have a proven man here already ? Edited 7 hours ago by pimpin4rizeal 4
suewhistle Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago What weighs on my mind is the sheer bloody stupidity. Did the manager or anyone at the club conduct a risk analysis and cost benefit analysis or was the idea so normalised in their minds that "everyone does it", which, apart from the EFL does seem to be the case. Did they assume points and a fine? There's plenty of people on here who will know that assuming is fatal to judgement making. The actual execution of the offence was also incompetent. How about some binoculars and telephoto lenses and a bit of subterfuge? Put on a hi-viz or carry some shears or something! As for the morality and seriousness of the cheating, it doesn't seem that Gibson was too worried about the offence to the extent of building a fence or growing a hedge. Nor does it seem to concern other leagues. Having only played at a level involving twice a week training do teams only practice secret stuff in the last 72 hours? What about 74 hours? Mind you, this goes back to the benefits, which seem pretty paltry. They've got a season of video to pore over and any change on the pitch needs a reaction. That's where Russell Martin was so crap, stuck in his rut of 'process'.. As said above, the players' opinions matter, and they can't be very pleased with their manager or the club. 3
Morse Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago I dont buy this 'he embarrassed the club' thing. Nobody outside of Southampton and Middlesbrough gives a shit about this. Once next season is underway it will be old news. Tonda is our best chance of promotion next season, why change? 13
Eire Saint Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, LaptopSaint said: So if I’ve got this right, the Tonda Out crowd want to sack him because he broke the rules, not because of the nature of the punishment. He’s brought shame on the club, and we now need to sit in the stocks and have rotten veg and shit thrown at us. Presumably you’d all think the same if the punishment had been a £2m fine and 6 point penalty, and we’d beaten Hull on Saturday to get promoted. He broke the rules. Fire him. The argument that there was no other sporting sanction available is bollocks. Plenty of people in football who are nothing to do with Saints think the punishment is way over the top. So do plenty of lawyers. And the legal precedent the EFL have now saddled themselves with is crazy. There are practical reasons why we may well have to get rid of Tonda anyway - FA ban or players’ revolt. But we’ve been walked all over once. Let’s not let it happen again. This is it in a nutshell. Before the sanction there was a lot of joking about the situation, including from our own players (THB, prime suspect). Yeah we knew we spied, we heard it wasn't the first time. Anyone calling for Tonda to go then? The EFL make an over the top judgement based on heavy influence and now it's the crime of the century? Keep him (if we can) and we'll do well this season. Peretz declared his love for him, so players may be still on board. Alternative is rolling the dice on a journeyman manager. 5
Midfield_General Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 58 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said: https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/tonda-eckert-southampton-spygate-play-offs-dn722kv26 Interesting article in the the times regarding how spying is seen as "the norm" in Germany. Amazing that no-one at the club realised that we're not in Germany then, really. You'd think at least one of them would have noticed.
AlexLaw76 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 9 minutes ago, Eire Saint said: This is it in a nutshell. Before the sanction there was a lot of joking about the situation, including from our own players (THB, prime suspect). Yeah we knew we spied, we heard it wasn't the first time. Anyone calling for Tonda to go then? The EFL make an over the top judgement based on heavy influence and now it's the crime of the century? Keep him (if we can) and we'll do well this season. Peretz declared his love for him, so players may be still on board. Alternative is rolling the dice on a journeyman manager. They loved him because we were winning most games, they would love Harry Redknapp for the exact same thing now they have found out that the winning came at a price Edited 7 hours ago by AlexLaw76
Lord Duckhunter Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, CB Fry said: That's how we "fight back" for fucks sake. From what I can see. The fight back involves continuing to moan about the punishment, banging on that it’s only the last 72 hours that’s the problem, reminding everyone it’s legal in a different country, and keeping the bloke whose direct actions have led to us being 4 points behind everyone else before a ball has been kicked. 5
Simo is back Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago As I have said in the Taylor thread imo Tonda's biggest crime was not keeping his circle tight , I like that he tried to use all the tricks he could to get us promoted. 3
AlexLaw76 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Simo is back said: As I have said in the Taylor thread imo Tonda's biggest crime was not keeping his circle tight , I like that he tried to use all the tricks he could to get us promoted. His biggest crime was systematically break the rules. 1
sockeye Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Southner said: https://x.com/i/status/2058858608511582400 Interesting
Owen The Saints Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, CB Fry said: Honestly insane to me that people can only see sacking Tonda as as submissive act that we'd only do because we're weak and its what Pompey or Boro might want us to do. His fuck ups have embarrassed the club, damaged the brand of the club in the community and to sponsors and cost us a very good shot at two hundred odd million quid (and keeping some excellent players). The idea that he could conceivably be manager next season is fucking insane. Every press conference, every i interview, every game is going to be tarnished with this shit. We need to start again. Be strong, take responsibility and clean the club up. That's how we "fight back" for fucks sake. 100% agree. Why wait, loads to sort out and be ready for next season. I reckon at least 1 board member was also involved, hence nothing has been done so far. As for the players, we'll have to let those go that don't want to stay and take the money offered. This includes Downes and Archer who wanted a move in the last transfer window and obviously the decent players like THB. I'm led to believe that trying to keep a player could lead to him terminating the contract in-line with a contract clause and move on as an un-attached player. This is real hurt, over and above the punishment handed out.
Teamsaint1 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, sockeye said: Interesting Wrong thread I suppose, but I wonder if there is a PL or top European first choice slot likely to be available ? i don’t think he’ll want to be on the bench ( though a massive salary always helps) so it could just be that when it all shakes down we may be his best option or at least one to consider.However, the reported option fee is high for a team that may be struggling to raise cash.
BARCELONASAINT Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I have to admit i have done a complete change of opinion on this subject. When the news first broke i was very angry and wanted Tonda out immediately, all i could see was he was responsible for destroying a season of epic hard work to get us to the brink of the Premiership and everyone hated us. Now i have adopted that siege mentality and want him to stay. Fuck the spineless FA who in my etes can never be taken seriously until they deal with Man City. Fuck the EFL who went way over the top and buckled to cry baby Gibson and his croonies. Why should we sack a manager who is clearly talented unless the FA force us to (fuck them) or the players refuse to play for him. Every bloody club cheats, no more than the big boys who do it all the time in one way or another and constantly get away with it. Right now i dont give a toss about this quaint Hampshire club thats really family friendly and always the bridesmaid but never the bride. Lets show some fight and stand up. 10
egg Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, LaptopSaint said: So if I’ve got this right, the Tonda Out crowd want to sack him because he broke the rules, not because of the nature of the punishment. He’s brought shame on the club, and we now need to sit in the stocks and have rotten veg and shit thrown at us. Presumably you’d all think the same if the punishment had been a £2m fine and 6 point penalty, and we’d beaten Hull on Saturday to get promoted. He broke the rules. Fire him. The argument that there was no other sporting sanction available is bollocks. Plenty of people in football who are nothing to do with Saints think the punishment is way over the top. So do plenty of lawyers. And the legal precedent the EFL have now saddled themselves with is crazy. There are practical reasons why we may well have to get rid of Tonda anyway - FA ban or players’ revolt. But we’ve been walked all over once. Let’s not let it happen again. That's bollocks. The panel had to punish us, and it had to be a sporting sanction. You don't try to sort the opposition team and tactics in breach of the rules and avoid a sporting sanction. Not even in saintsweb land. I'm still waiting for someone to give one credible, just one, sporting sanction. I can't think of anything other than points in this league and an EFL cup ban BUT the club didn't seek that. They pressed for a fine which was, being blunt, absolutely fucking deluded of them. Given the choice between our suggestion of a fine, and the expulsion, it was only going one way. 1
Scummer Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, egg said: I'm still waiting for someone to give one credible, just one, sporting sanction. I can't think of anything other than points in this league and an EFL cup ban You've just suggested 2? And it's not general practice for the defence to suggest their own punishment.
HKsaint Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) I would like to know if there will be any further investigation to be conducted against any person including Tonda within the Club? We should get this clear as soon as possible. If Tonda is required to serve a long suspension, then we have no choice. If not, he should continue to lead the team and the unbeaten run, subject to any disagreement amongst the players. If our unbeaten run continues to the next season, it highly likely that we will get auto promotion next season. No one knows who else is involved in the spying. We should be united together and make a fresh start. We have already received the punishment that we deserved or more than deserved. We don’t need to punish ourselves further. Edited 6 hours ago by HKsaint
egg Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Scummer said: You've just suggested 2? And it's not general practice for the defence to suggest their own punishment. This isn't a criminal court. It's a tribunal/arbitration, and the panels role was to consider what both sides sought. We sought a fine...that's like trying to rob a bank and asking for a conditional discharge... ridiculous approval from the club.
Noodles34 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, CB Fry said: Honestly insane to me that people can only see sacking Tonda as as submissive act that we'd only do because we're weak and its what Pompey or Boro might want us to do. His fuck ups have embarrassed the club, damaged the brand of the club in the community and to sponsors and cost us a very good shot at two hundred odd million quid (and keeping some excellent players). The idea that he could conceivably be manager next season is fucking insane. Every press conference, every i interview, every game is going to be tarnished with this shit. We need to start again. Be strong, take responsibility and clean the club up. That's how we "fight back" for fucks sake. This is bollocks. Fuck em all and be Southampton ‘we don’t give a fuck’. Keep Tonda and do what we can to get promoted next season and laugh all the way back to The EPL. 3
Golac's Iron Gonads Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, CB Fry said: His fuck ups have embarrassed the club, damaged the brand of the club in the community and to sponsors I'm more embarrassed by two 9-0 defeats, a Ted Bates statue that bore little resemblance to a human being, barely beating Derby's points total record, hiring Will Still, Nathan Jones, Juric, and Martin, and utilising goal music! 'Clean the club up' We've been a joke for decades, the only reason 2 hours ago, CB Fry said: Every press conference, every i interview, every game is going to be tarnished with this shit. is because we are so insignificant that Journos cant even be arsed to do a little research on us and will just ask the laziest questions to receive an answer that could possibly garner a couple of sentences that may be of some small interest to a neutral reader sat on the bog scrolling through articles. Edited 5 hours ago by Golac's Iron Gonads 4
pingpong Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Keep. It's not that big of a deal and will be old news by August, there's a world cup between now and then. Boro (and some of our fans for some reason) can clutch their pearls as much as they like - if Boro had gotten promoted, do you think they wouldn't scout their opponents because of some moral duty? No, they'd be doing it every week. The act is just not that naughty. Its a technical fail, and disrupted this season, but next season is a fresh chance - if we keep the core we can win this league at a canter. 6
egg Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Noodles34 said: This is bollocks. Fuck em all and be Southampton ‘we don’t give a fuck’. Keep Tonda and do what we can to get promoted next season and laugh all the way back to The EPL. How do you reckon that'll sit with a) sponsors and b) players? I'd be staggered if he still has the support of the dressing room. 2
Katalinic Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, egg said: How do you reckon that'll sit with a) sponsors and b) players? I'd be staggered if he still has the support of the dressing room. Peretz just said he loves the manager which I was surprised about tbh. Also interesting that Spors delivered the news about the appeal to the players - perhaps Tonda has been suspended. 4
Window Cleaner Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 26 minutes ago, HKsaint said: I would like to know if there will be any further investigation to be conducted against any person including Tonda within the Club? We should get this clear as soon as possible. If Tonda is required to serve a long suspension, then we have no choice. If not, he should continue to lead the team and the unbeaten run, subject to any disagreement amongst the players. If our unbeaten run continues to the next season, it highly likely that we will get auto promotion next season. No one knows who else is involved in the spying. We should be united together and make a fresh start. We have already received the punishment that we deserved or more than deserved. We don’t need to punish ourselves further. What's there to investigate really, they all knew what was going on. Don't need a Spanish Inquisition. We might be on the wrong side of an employment tribunal though if the "facts" about making junior employees conduct illicit activitys against their will though. There will be a FA case against us.
Noodles34 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 10 minutes ago, egg said: How do you reckon that'll sit with a) sponsors and b) players? I'd be staggered if he still has the support of the dressing room. Juts in case people didn’t know, he didn’t kill anyone FFS 6
Football Special Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, Harry_SFC said: https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/tonda-eckert-southampton-spygate-play-offs-dn722kv26 Interesting article in the the times regarding how spying is seen as "the norm" in Germany. I read that article in the Sunday Times yesterday, was very interesting, reminder of how young Ekhert is, the elite level analyst teams he's been around and how closely his career is entwined with Spors
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now