Jump to content

Plymouth still on the brink


positivepete

Recommended Posts

I wish they'd hurry up and go to the wall. That'd mean we lose no points and wouldn't have a tricky away game at home park, whilst our rivals would all lose points.

 

IMO them going out of existance would see us promoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish they'd hurry up and go to the wall. That'd mean we lose no points and wouldn't have a tricky away game at home park, whilst our rivals would all lose points.

 

IMO them going out of existance would see us promoted.

 

Hope they survive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish they'd hurry up and go to the wall. That'd mean we lose no points and wouldn't have a tricky away game at home park, whilst our rivals would all lose points.

 

IMO them going out of existance would see us promoted.

 

What a short memory you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The powers that be would not allow a club to cease exsistance in the middle of a season, it would cause too many problems and protest from other clubs over points removed etc. If you believe otherwise i'm afraid you are a tad simple.

 

Which "powers that be" can stop an administrator pulling the plug and liquidating? How exactly would they stop it happening? How could they without upsetting the other 71 Football League Clubs?

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which "powers that be" can stop an administrator pulling the plug and liquidating? How exactly would they stop it happening? How could they without upsetting the other 71 Football League Clubs?

 

The fact that its never happened yet, but could have many times is conclusive enough, it would cause far too many problems for other clubs, it wont happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that its never happened yet, but could have many times is conclusive enough, it would cause far too many problems for other clubs, it wont happen.

What a strange logic. By the same reasoning you might have said that, before we were placed in administration, the fact that we hadn't ever been placed in administration before but could have been was conclusive enough evidence that we wouldn't be. Until we were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that its never happened yet, but could have many times is conclusive enough, it would cause far too many problems for other clubs, it wont happen.

 

That didn't answer any of my three questions.

 

btw it has happened, a number of English football clubs have been liquidated recently. The "powers that be" didn't stop it happening.

 

The Football League can't justify spending money to save Plymouth to the other 71 member clubs. Especially as it could be money down the drain if the club then goes under in the summer. Unlike Pompey there is no parachute payment to forward to Plymouth (a club with £13m of debt and no cash flow to fund the admin process).

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plymouth do appear to be in real trouble now.

 

It's not debt that's killing them so much, but the fact that cash flow is negative. They can't cover their running costs, and going into administration to reduce the debt won't help that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that its never happened yet, but could have many times is conclusive enough, it would cause far too many problems for other clubs, it wont happen.

 

Why would it cause too many problems? Presumably there is a rule that says results are expunged. Everyone would be aware of it. Everyone knows Plymouth are in difficulties. The only ones to suffer would be fans who have booked trains etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, every club that has gone into admin has had this "last game" nonsense, no one has anything to gain from them going under mid-season.

 

Well actually, we have.

 

Not that I'd want it to happen though, perish the thought.

 

Tut tut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The powers that be would not allow a club to cease exsistance in the middle of a season, it would cause too many problems and protest from other clubs over points removed etc. If you believe otherwise i'm afraid you are a tad simple.

 

Complete rubbish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would it cause too many problems? Presumably there is a rule that says results are expunged. Everyone would be aware of it. Everyone knows Plymouth are in difficulties. The only ones to suffer would be fans who have booked trains etc.

 

And while we are thinking of the small inconvenience of a wasted train ticket or revelling in the glory it would bring to us let's conveniently forget about their fans who would lose their club. The players and employees who would find themselves out of work.

 

Have you, and others, forgotten where we were with our club back in 2008/9?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they will survive the season...

BUT if they don't..how would that affect the points tally of clubs who've already played them, if their record is expunged ?

 

We lost our home game ..so we "lose " nothing, but what about Brighton, Huddf'd, Peterboro', MK Dons and Bournemouth?

some of them have probably played Argyle twice already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick look shows they lost to Brighton twice (-6 for them then), Lost to Bmouth twice (-6) lost to Peterborough once (-3 with a game yet to play) lost to Huddersfield once and won once (-3) beat MK Dons once and one yet to play (0) and beat us once with one to play (0)

 

So with Brighton and Bmouth losing 6, Pborough losing 3 and Hudders losing 3 it would pretty much definately promote us and also give us a decent chance of chasing Brighton!

 

Not a nice way to go about winning though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I got so impatient I looked it up myself.

 

Brighton and B'mouth beat them twice and would lose 6 points each. Huddf'd won once and lost once - lose 3 points as would do 'Boro.

Saints and MK Dons both lost to them once and therefore lose nothing .

A table revised (as of today ) would look like this.

 

Brighton 74

Hudd'f'd 67

SAINTS 65

MK Dons 65

Peterb'o 63

B'mouth 59

 

only a little better for us and tough on those teams who have still yet to play them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a nice way to go about winning though.

 

Playing devil's advocate...you could say that the the Plymouth team that beat Saints on the opening day was one they shouldn't have had (and should have sold in the summer rather than January) and couldn't afford, along with the £500k they spent on a new pitch in the summer. ;)

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I got so impatient I looked it up myself.

 

Brighton and B'mouth beat them twice and would lose 6 points each. Huddf'd won once and lost once - lose 3 points as would do 'Boro.

Saints and MK Dons both lost to them once and therefore lose nothing .

A table revised (as of today ) would look like this.

 

Brighton 74

Hudd'f'd 67

SAINTS 65

MK Dons 65

Peterb'o 63

B'mouth 59

 

only a little better for us and tough on those teams who have still yet to play them again.

 

Include the games played and it shows Saints in a strong position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brighton 35 74

Hudd 37 67

Saints 35 65

Dons 38 65

P'Boro 36 63

Orient 37 57

Bmuff 36 56

 

In a 44 match season - Interestingly Orient have not played Plymouth yet so slip into the playoff positions

Edited by Trader
Forgot orient
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I hope they survive even though their demise would greatly benefit our cause.

 

It would set a very dangerous precedent if the FL were to get involved in order to 'prop up' any club that suffers financial difficulties and considers administration. Doing so could even encourange some clubs to look beyond thier means in order to strive for something that they do not have the asetts to achieve - thus making the whole football/money situation considerably worse than it currently is.

 

Having been through it ourselves, we should all have sympathy with the staff and fans of Plymouth, but the FL rules are in place, and unfortunately they will have to abide by them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The powers that be would not allow a club to cease exsistance in the middle of a season, it would cause too many problems and protest from other clubs over points removed etc. If you believe otherwise i'm afraid you are a tad simple.

 

Is that what Wall Street said about Lehman Brothers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick look shows they lost to Brighton twice (-6 for them then), Lost to Bmouth twice (-6) lost to Peterborough once (-3 with a game yet to play) lost to Huddersfield once and won once (-3) beat MK Dons once and one yet to play (0) and beat us once with one to play (0)

 

So with Brighton and Bmouth losing 6, Pborough losing 3 and Hudders losing 3 it would pretty much definately promote us and also give us a decent chance of chasing Brighton!

 

Not a nice way to go about winning though.

 

So as I've said before, I don't want them to go bust, but if they are going to anyway let's hope it happens before the season ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has happened Maidstone United, Accrington Stanley to name but two. I think there have been more.

 

Maidstone went pop before the season began. But AS did go mid season and according to Wiki they were the second team to do it, I don't know who were the first. It wasn't Bradford PA, New Brighton, Darwen or Thames, so I give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maidstone went pop before the season began. But AS did go mid season and according to Wiki they were the second team to do it, I don't know who were the first. It wasn't Bradford PA, New Brighton, Darwen or Thames, so I give up.

 

New Brighton Tower, 1898-1901 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_Football_League_clubs

 

In the Conference Newport County, Scarborough, Halifax Town and Chester City have all gone bankrupt within a season or two of relegation from the League in the last 25 years, the circumstances without fail being that the team got very bad due to financial problems before the finances completely caved in - the only difference with Aldershot and Maidstone was that their finances caved in whilst the team was still in the league.

 

It can happen, and the League has absolutely no control over it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing devil's advocate...you could say that the the Plymouth team that beat Saints on the opening day was one they shouldn't have had (and should have sold in the summer rather than January) and couldn't afford, along with the £500k they spent on a new pitch in the summer. ;)

I'm quoting from this in my above post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same fella who told me about the game being called off weeks in advance has told me this morning that neither of the two potential buyers are interested in running a football club. They are simply property developers.

 

They are developers... What have you heard about argiggle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

plymouth wont go pop...some bloke from japan and a property developer are in talk apparenlty......like always, they will play the waiting game till they are "hours" from going pop to get the best price

 

Are Plymuff a PLC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same fella who told me about the game being called off weeks in advance has told me this morning that neither of the two potential buyers are interested in running a football club. They are simply property developers.

 

Legal wrangling over value of the land compared to the value of the four mortgages on Home Park. Administrator has been told that the deal is for the land and not the football club. I have no reason to doubt the truth of this.

 

Both of those are hardly secrets, was in the Plymouth Evening Herald last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It needs a club to go under during the season for some idiots to wake up and realise football isn't some separate fantasy business where money will always come in and save the day. Already on this thread we have 'it hasn't happened so it won't happen' and 'the powers that be won't let it happen'. Logic seems to be in short supply.

 

The powers that be have effectively relegated Plymouth already, that could finish them off. I do hope a club goes under soon, but not Plymouth. Forgetting rivalry, it should have been Pompey as they deserved if for the cheating. Maybe it still will be, but until then clubs and fans will continue to operate under the same ridiculous assumptions it seems.

 

Lets hope you don't get your wish a Adey, You never know it might just be SFC, As for Dune,,,,Spoken like a womens pee thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting conundrum for Saints. Do we spend money on Jack Stephens' date=' which could help Argyle through to the season's end, or do we not sign him now (& try to sign him as a free agent if they went bust) which would also enhance our auto promotion prospects???[/quote']

 

 

I doesn't really matter, he's just a kid and we have far far better for the time being. If we want to help them out of their iffy patch then we should do it. I'd be interested to know why he turned Fulham down though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...