Jump to content

Saints 1-4 Man City - Match Thread


Uncle Albert
 Share

Recommended Posts

No shame in this, the team have given it everything, a bit of luck and no mistakes and we'd be in it or winning. But how often do you really manage that? 

Saints fans in the ground though have been a real dissapointment based on the BBC coverage. Maybe the mics are in a bad spot, but it's sounded like a city homegame most of the match. 

Chants of "your support is f'ing shit" and fans leaving with 15min to go. Players deserve better backing than this. Ditto people raging at the players here when they run their socks off vs one of the best teams in the world. 

Edited by Saint86
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dman said:

What’s your argument? It was a stone wall pen, that was given and checked on VaR amd still given. 
 

Other than some made up scenario in your head where that wouldn’t have been given the other end, I don’t really know what you’re trying to prove. 

It was a soft penalty at best. Calling it stonewall is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jimmy_D said:

It was a soft penalty at best. Calling it stonewall is ridiculous.

I’m which case, they’d be right in looking at it up the other end then? 
 

It wasn’t soft, it was fucking obvious. 

Edited by Dman
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dman said:

What’s your argument? It was a stone wall pen, that was given and checked on VaR amd still given. 
 

Other than some made up scenario in your head where that wouldn’t have been given the other end, I don’t really know what you’re trying to prove. 

You saying it was soft, doesn't mean it was.

None of our players made a fuss. They knew it was a penalty all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both their subs score, their strength in depth is too much and why they want five subs in the league. Equally, if there wasn’t five subs we possibly don’t start both Broja and Adams on the bench, as using 2/3 to bring them on poses a bit more of a risk than 2/5. Shit rule. Doesn’t deserve a 4-1 score line. But, we all know the defence needs bolstering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, obelisk said:

To beat City Saints needed to limit defensive mistakes and to take their chances when they came along. That's the difference.

Yeah. Solid no nonsense defence, take our chances, ride our luck. We got lucky with the equalizer but that's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you aren’t going to like this but Forster has now reverted to type. Despite being 6’7” he flaps at a cross he should have caught or punched and it goes out for a throw (goal 3) and gets beaten low, near-post (goal 4).

City have ruthlessly exploited our known weaknesses. Every gooal has come from a clear error.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

You saying it was soft, doesn't mean it was.

None of our players made a fuss. They knew it was a penalty all day.

No, you’re right, it was the player going down too easy made it a soft penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Viking Saint said:

We're 1-4 down at home, in a game where we could've been three up if we'd taken our chances.

But that’s what billions of Dirhams buys you, top quality players who finish their chances. As opposed to a £15m striker and whatever Shane Long is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, verlaine1979 said:

Finishing makes the difference, as always. Adams and Armstrong just both strike the ball poorly and that's never going to change.

No idea why Broja did not start this game.  Some of the breaks we had, he'd of been in his element. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lighthouse said:

But that’s what billions of Dirhams buys you, top quality players who finish their chances. As opposed to a £15m striker and whatever Shane Long is.

I’m sorry but any premier league striker should be taking 2 or 3 of those chances (thinking Armstrong off the post and Adams). 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

No shame in this, the team have given it everything, a bit of luck and no mistakes and we'd be in it or winning. But how often do you really manage that? 

Saints fans in the ground though have been a real dissapointment based on the BBC coverage. Maybe the mics are in a bad spot, but it's sounded like a city homegame most of the match. 

Chants of "your support is f'ing shit" and fans leaving with 15min to go. Players deserve better backing than this. Ditto people raging at the players here when they run their socks off vs one of the best teams in the world. 

That's what happens and will continue to happen in cup games when we disperse our kop end and give the seats to away fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lighthouse said:

Neither are Premier League strikers, that’s pretty much my point.

Oh I got you! Yep agreed. 
 

Adams is a bit more of a rounded and technically better Shane Long and Armstrong looks miles off being a premier league player on today’s display. Really average. 

Edited by Dman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CanadaSaint said:

Some of you aren’t going to like this but Forster has now reverted to type. Despite being 6’7” he flaps at a cross he should have caught or punched and it goes out for a throw (goal 3) and gets beaten low, near-post (goal 4).

City have ruthlessly exploited our known weaknesses. Every gooal has come from a clear error.

 

Dunno why you comment? You just spout crap. How on earth you can put any blame on Forster for two of their goals is beyond parody. What a melt.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lighthouse changed the title to Saints 1-4 Man City - Match Thread
  • Lighthouse unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...