Jump to content

Fraser Forster - Official: Signs for Spurs

stevy777_x

By stevy777_x,
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, DT said:

If we let him go as I fear we might, given our mystifying decision to award McCarthy a new contract, then the new keeper we get in must be a clear number 1, not an understudy to McCarthy. 

Assuming the contract is true (it must be) McCarthy will be on number 1 wages. Doesn't mean he starts though. It could well be Johnstone coming in and they would then compete for the shirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
On 22/03/2022 at 09:34, spyinthesky said:

Forster has been playing well enough recently.

Need to sort out his wages but would rather spend £20m or so on an outfield player than on a 'keeper at the moment

Got to say that with the club's lost income due to COVID and the debt we have, money could well be tight this summer, so spending £10m, £15m, £20m here, there and everywhere, without a major departure, might not be possible. I can see us resigning Long and attempting again to resign Forster. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JRM

JRM

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, cloggy saint said:

By my reckoning there are 6 English first team 'keepers in the PL. Two are already called up, Ramsdale is injured. Foster is about 56 years old and Gunn is crap. Who else were they going to call up to sit on the bench for 2 games? If he's called up it's by default.

I'd have thought Southgate will go with one for the future - Henderson? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Danbert

Danbert

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Chez said:

Got to say that with the club's lost income due to COVID and the debt we have, money could well be tight this summer, so spending £10m, £15m, £20m here, there and everywhere, without a major departure, might not be possible. I can see us resigning Long and attempting again to resign Forster. 

Other clubs will have financial issues - I love Shane, but I find it hard to believe there won't be better bargains around than him

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Danbert said:

Other clubs will have financial issues - I love Shane, but I find it hard to believe there won't be better bargains around than him

If he is on, say £70k a week and we have to offer the same again, then it doesn't feel good value to me, but as always its the total cost (transfer fee, signing on fee, wages) over the course of the contract that matters. Another factor is that by paying him, we cant take a punt on someone else that perhaps will a) be better b) increase their resale value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Charlie Wayman said:

I like him but it is probably best all round if he and the Club go their separate ways.

Too much baggage on here amongst fans for him to ever be able to completely redeem himself in their eyes;  what's the point if everyone is just waiting for the poor sod to drop a goulie.

not sure the majority of fans feel like that. Certainly not at SMS. When at a game I don't get that sense of dread or concern. I think there is usual nervousness when the ball is at his feet, but thats the same with most sets of fans with most keepers. I don't think making howlers has ever been the problem with Forster. Its more his lack of agility or movement off his line. McCarthy is more agile, but he is the one that drops the odd howler.

Maybe the bar has dropped, but I think most fans feel Forster is getting back to his best. He isn't more agile, but his positioning is great and he gets in the way of a lot (he makes the goal small) - he always been good at that.

I'd like a better keeper, and thought this summer was an opportunity, but on our budget, can we find better?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Cat

The Cat

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Chez said:

not sure the majority of fans feel like that. Certainly not at SMS. When at a game I don't get that sense of dread or concern. I think there is usual nervousness when the ball is at his feet, but thats the same with most sets of fans with most keepers. I don't think making howlers has ever been the problem with Forster. Its more his lack of agility or movement off his line. McCarthy is more agile, but he is the one that drops the odd howler.

Maybe the bar has dropped, but I think most fans feel Forster is getting back to his best. He isn't more agile, but his positioning is great and he gets in the way of a lot (he makes the goal small) - he always been good at that.

I'd like a better keeper, and thought this summer was an opportunity, but on our budget, can we find better?

The bar has dropped. We're used to watching average keepers week in week out at Saints. Forster's positioning is good compared to someone like Pickford, but the rest of his game is largely poor.

Another standard which is low, and maybe skews people's judgement, is the lack of quality amongst English keepers in general. Most reasonable size nations have much stronger depth in quality than we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
skintsaint

skintsaint

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, danjosaint said:

After somebody posted about the French keeper Lafont I had a little read and he seems a real talent 

Well he fits the bill, moved to a better league and made a number of high level errors (wiki facts) before returning back to France. Need the next scapegoat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JRM

JRM

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Really pleased for him. He's come back from a lot to earn it.

England's number 1, England's England's number 1. 

When you look at some of the goals Pickford and Pope have conceded it's not like England have a clear outstanding keeper at the moment. Pleased for Forster. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JRM

JRM

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Master Bates said:

I remember what happened last time we had 3 players in the England squad.

2017? I remember we had 4 players in the squad, Forster, Bertrand, JWP and Redmond 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nordic Saint

Nordic Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, once_bitterne said:

Shame we've already given McColander a new deal and will be letting FF go.

I've been watching Saints since 1963 and in that time we've only had 3 goalkeepers better than Forster - Shilton, Flowers and Niemi - and the number of international caps our goalkeepers have had in that time would tend to support this view.  It's bizarre that some fans think we can just get rid of him and replace him with someone who'll be better and that it will also save the club money when the reality is we could waste at least £20 mill on a transfer fee + similar wages to Forster's on a goalkeeper who'll turn out not to be as good as him.

Edited by Nordic Saint
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Miltonaggro

Miltonaggro

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Nordic Saint said:

I've been watching Saints since 1963 and in that time we've only had 3 goalkeepers better than Forster - Shilton, Flowers and Niemi - and the number of international caps our goalkeepers have had in that time would tend to support this.  It's bizarre that some fans think we can just get rid of him and replace him with someone who'll be better. The reality is we could waste at least £20 mill on a transfer fee + similar wages to Forster's on a goalkeeper who'll turn out not be as good as him.

In my time, I think I'd have Artur Boruc and Paul Jones in the first 11 before Forster, and possibly the Terry Gennoe V.1 that existed prior to the 1979 League Cup Final.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Golac's Cunning Stunts

Golac's Cunning Stunts

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Nordic Saint said:

I've been watching Saints since 1963 and in that time we've only had 3 goalkeepers better than Forster - Shilton, Flowers and Niemi - and the number of international caps our goalkeepers have had in that time would tend to support this view.  It's bizarre that some fans think we can just get rid of him and replace him with someone who'll be better and that it will also save the club money when the reality is we could waste at least £20 mill on a transfer fee + similar wages to Forster's on a goalkeeper who'll turn out not to be as good as him.

How can you leave The Kat off that list

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Nordic Saint said:

I've been watching Saints since 1963 and in that time we've only had 3 goalkeepers better than Forster - Shilton, Flowers and Niemi - and the number of international caps our goalkeepers have had in that time would tend to support this view.  It's bizarre that some fans think we can just get rid of him and replace him with someone who'll be better and that it will also save the club money when the reality is we could waste at least £20 mill on a transfer fee + similar wages to Forster's on a goalkeeper who'll turn out not to be as good as him.

Boruc was better as well. 
 

i do agree with your second point though, unless you’re signing proven quality which we can’t afford it’s a gamble and the idea we can just let him go and sign better for less is naive. We might do but it’s a risk. In truth there are very few decent keepers out there these days. I’m not exactly inspired by signing the West Brom keeper as a replacement.

Edited by Turkish
Link to comment
Share on other sites
notnowcato

notnowcato

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Boruc was better as well. 
 

i do agree with your second point though, unless you’re signing proven quality which we can’t afford it’s a gamble and the idea we can just let him go and sign better for less is naive. We might do but it’s a risk. In truth there are very few decent keepers out there these days. I’m not exactly inspired by signing the West Brom keeper as a replacement.

Is Forster proven "quality"??  His quality is proven and many would say we should be looking for better.

Anyway, this could all be irrelevant as Fraser might decide a change of scenery is what he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DT

DT

Posted
Posted

Debating getting rid of a keeper who has just been picked to play for England while honouring a ropey old mistake-monger like McCarthy with a new contract instead is the kind of Saintsness I thought we had left behind.

Forster must either have a very bolshie agent or we are grumbling at paying 'over the odds' but his performances over the last period are one of the main reasons we are where we are and probably worth the extra. But someone is clearly digging their heels in. All a bit of a shame. But if he has to go, again, I hope we get a new number 1, rather than muddling through on the cheapskatery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Nordic Saint said:

I've been watching Saints since 1963 and in that time we've only had 3 goalkeepers better than Forster - Shilton, Flowers and Niemi - ....

Eric Martin was a favourite of mine when I first started following Saints. Remember the "Eric for Scotland" chants when Scotland had a decent team, early 1970's.  Not up to the three you mention but in his prime I'd say he was no worse than FF.

8 hours ago, Miltonaggro said:

In my time, I think I'd have Artur Boruc and Paul Jones in the first 11 before Forster, and possibly the Terry Gennoe V.1 that existed prior to the 1979 League Cup Final.

Had an incredible run didn't he? I really though Lawrie had pulled off a masterstroke signing him, but his confidence dissolved in that game and after.

4 hours ago, once_bitterne said:

And Maik Taylor before all of them.

Agreed. Always felt he was unfairly cast aside after we signed Paul Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Miltonaggro

Miltonaggro

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, CB Fry said:

John Burridge is in absolute bits reading this thread 😪

Nonsense, Budgie will self-motivate with ten motivational press ups, some squat thrusts, and a hang from the banister for half an hour to come up to the commanding height of five foot eight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VectisSaint

VectisSaint

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, DT said:

Debating getting rid of a keeper who has just been picked to play for England while honouring a ropey old mistake-monger like McCarthy with a new contract instead is the kind of Saintsness I thought we had left behind.

Forster must either have a very bolshie agent or we are grumbling at paying 'over the odds' but his performances over the last period are one of the main reasons we are where we are and probably worth the extra. But someone is clearly digging their heels in. All a bit of a shame. But if he has to go, again, I hope we get a new number 1, rather than muddling through on the cheapskatery.

Debating all this is a complete waste of time. As far as I understand it is already all sorted. Forster and McCarthy were both offered new contract last summer, but there was no guarantee they would be No 1 after this season. Forster turned it down, McCarthy accepted (and allegedly signed). Forster effectively said he would let his contract run down and leave on a free transfer. I imagine that he is already sorted for next season given the time he has had to find a new club. Whether we want to keep him now is almost certainly immaterial, he is going and we will have a new keeper. The only complication is whether McCarthy will be welcomed back into the squad for next season after his behaviour in the game he got injured, Ralph was clearly incensed, and it is strange to me that he is still "injured", is he, or is he now just persona non grata. We have Caballero who we could turn to for a backup next season by offering him a new contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
TWar

TWar

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Saint_clark said:

It's so typical of this club that we're keeping McCarthy and letter Forster go for nothing.

We'll see. There may be a world where we keep Forster and try to shift Macca. He doesn't need to be released to leave. Might be able to send him to the Championship on a free if his new deal isn't too high wage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VectisSaint

VectisSaint

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

It's so typical of this club that we're keeping McCarthy and letter Forster go for nothing.

It's what happens when you offer someone a contract and they turn it down. Reckon he has next season sorted already and has had for some time. To be honest up to the game where he got injured McCarthy was absolutely fine. Then he made a complete twat of himself. Wouldn't surprise me if we move Macca on as well as Forster and the other guy who's name escapes me, and go with Willy as a backup to a new no 1 next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TWar

TWar

Posted
Posted

Important not to be too reactionary about this I guess. Forster has had good spells before before falling back into mediocrity. His form following his injury comes to mind. Would still be unhappy going into next season with Forster and McCarthy but if we can have Forster as our cup keeper/second keeper and a new guy we'd have some very good options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, The Cat said:

He's had 2 good games in a row and people are getting carried away. He's still inconsistent and his distribution is poor.

We can do better.

What’s his Xsaves been?

Edited by Turkish
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Lighthouse changed the title to Fraser Forster - Official: Signs for Spurs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})

  I accept