Jump to content

Russell Martin


LegalEagle

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, DT said:

Personally if things don't work out I'd love us to finally lure David Moyes to get back to basics and get us up next season. Just not sure that we have the personnel - or ever will - for Russ' style. As it is we need a decent keeper and a striker who isn't shit, as well as replacements for all of those players who are clearly off. A tall order.

He's carried that scar tissue for 23 years ..... surprised his career ever recovered from not taking the job when offered to him

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DT said:

Personally if things don't work out I'd love us to finally lure David Moyes to get back to basics and get us up next season. Just not sure that we have the personnel - or ever will - for Russ' style. As it is we need a decent keeper and a striker who isn't shit, as well as replacements for all of those players who are clearly off. A tall order.

That’s what has often confused me. I never understood the long term strategy of setting out to be a pound - shop City, it’s a contradiction in terms. Just say we get promoted, what then? Apply the City style resourced with the Southampton budget? Disastrous.
 

What credentials did Wilcox ever have to be our DoF, or the inexperienced Martin, with a questionable managerial track record, to be the man to take us up this season, which is probably the best opportunity we could have for a long time?
 

The whole thing stinks of a Rasmus vanity project. Dragan needs kick some arses.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DT said:

Personally if things don't work out I'd love us to finally lure David Moyes to get back to basics and get us up next season. Just not sure that we have the personnel - or ever will - for Russ' style. As it is we need a decent keeper and a striker who isn't shit, as well as replacements for all of those players who are clearly off. A tall order.

We could do a lot worse. I'm pretty sure we'd get promoted under Moyes. However he's not cool or have a hipsters philosophy. I'd probably go for Steve Cooper but i dont reckon they'll sack him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint said:

In terms of excitement at a football match, I'm struggling to think of another season where there been so many games that have caused real tension and excitement. Last minute winners (Watford a week ago), goals galore (Huddersfield, Blackburn), heart in mouth moments as the team tries to bring the ball out from defence...and RM has got to take a lot of credit for creating that environment.

He even seems to have learned that Jack S. is not the answer. What he hasn't got right is reacting to change in tactics from the opposition and managing the team to kill off games when we're so much on top. And he's got six games to get it right!

Blackburn (h) aside, all of the other games you've listed have been 'exciting' due to imcompentance. 

The sign of a good manager / team is winning those games comfortably - not 3-2 / 4-3 etc. relying on a last minute winner. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were to make a change Danny Rohl has done an amazing job at Wednesday and also we were playing very well under his coaching when he was with us.  Very experienced at top level in Germany and here and with something still to prove. Not sure if Moyes is still ambitious enough now and not really very progressive in nature but hey just throwing it out there. RM might yet sort his head out and our defence which would be preferable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

What about the possession stats though? 

20/21 season at MK Dons he finished 13th, but across Europe only Man City and Barcelona had higher possession percentage.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

20/21 season at MK Dons he finished 13th, but across Europe only Man City and Barcelona had higher possession percentage.

OK, so he's not the best manager in Europe like Nathan, but third's not to be sniffed at.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, captainchris said:

If we were to make a change Danny Rohl has done an amazing job at Wednesday and also we were playing very well under his coaching when he was with us.  Very experienced at top level in Germany and here and with something still to prove. Not sure if Moyes is still ambitious enough now and not really very progressive in nature but hey just throwing it out there. RM might yet sort his head out and our defence which would be preferable.

I thought about that also , Ralph / Saints weren’t as effective after his departure 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toussaint said:

I thought about that also , Ralph / Saints weren’t as effective after his departure 

Surely not this myth again. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toussaint said:

Was it? That is my recollection ? Ralph had his lockdown purple patch but other than that there were some very sketchy times 

Myth. We had our best season under Ralph when he was already gone.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toussaint said:

Oh well, myth then. He seems to have done well at Sheffield Wednesday 

Yeah, I've no doubt hes a good coach and looks a good manager. I'd have taken him here and still would (although I think something may have gone on behind the scenes which would prevent that - @Turkish might know more...). 

But Yes, its a myth we went on a instant downward spiral after he left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dman said:

Yeah, I've no doubt hes a good coach and looks a good manager. I'd have taken him here and still would (although I think something may have gone on behind the scenes which would prevent that - @Turkish might know more...). 

But Yes, it’s a myth we went on an instant downward spiral after he left. 

 You betcha I do 😇😇😇

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dman said:

Blackburn (h) aside, all of the other games you've listed have been 'exciting' due to imcompentance. 

The sign of a good manager / team is winning those games comfortably - not 3-2 / 4-3 etc. relying on a last minute winner. 

I agree. I deliberately chose the word exciting rather than competent. To be fair to RM, he has got us playing some neat passing football, but a) he hasn't got a plan when teams come on to us and b) he isn't yet tactically astute enough to react to changes from the opposition. In some ways, despite the incompetence up front and lack of a goalkeeper who saves shots, it's our midfield that is getting exposed. One poster mentioned we lost the plot when Romeu went and nowadays when Downes isn't playing and that's what he needs to sort out.

Personally reckon Charles could develop in to a competent CDM but there's something RM doesn't like about him. Maybe it's just his inexperience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

80 games at MK Dons, 105 goals conceded,

99 games at Swansea, 143 conceded,

48 games at Southampton, 63 conceded.

He cannot coach defences.

That is scary stats to be honest!  Dont think it will ever change under Martin .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, verlaine1979 said:

I do find it odd that the team completely falls apart without Downes, and yet it seemed far from certain at the time that he wanted to join us. What was the plan if he'd turned us down?

Plan a) convert Jack Stephens.

Plan b) mid-table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, verlaine1979 said:

I do find it odd that the team completely falls apart without Downes, and yet it seemed far from certain at the time that he wanted to join us. What was the plan if he'd turned us down?

Well it was certain, he wasn't linked with anyone else.

All that happened is he ate some dodgy chicken, got the shits and then the assorted dins on here decided we'd been gazumped, he wasn't coming and etc etc etc.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

If we don't go up I'd go for Cooper 

A decent, solid, experienced, non hipster, non good looking manager? The polar opposite of what the legend in his own mind Rasmus W. Ankersen wants. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Challenger said:

So convinced this bloke will not promote this team,I will personally present him with a bunch of flowers, naked ,in the center circle prior to our first game back in the Prem if wrong .

 

I don’t know if that’s something to look forward to or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ally_uk said:

If we don't go up I'd go for Cooper 

managed Swansea before Rusty did, here are their records.

Swansea finished 6th in his first season 4th in his second season losing in the play offs. Rusty managed 15th and 10th. 

Cooper in 3 years managing in the championship has never finished outside the play offs. 

 

50px-Steve_Cooper.jpg Steve Cooper 23px-Flag_of_Wales.svg.png Wales 13 June 2019 21 July 2021 2 years, 38 days 105 47 28 30 44.76   [51]
50px-Russell_Martin_2019.jpg Russell Martin 23px-Flag_of_Scotland.svg.png Scotland 1 August 2021 21 June 2023 1 year, 324 days 99 36 26 37

36.36

Edited by Turkish
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Turkish said:

managed Swansea before Rusty did, here are their records.

Swansea finished 6th in his first season 4th in his second season losing in the play offs. Rusty managed 15th and 10th. 

Cooper in 3 years managing in the championship has never finished outside the play offs. 

 

50px-Steve_Cooper.jpg Steve Cooper 23px-Flag_of_Wales.svg.png Wales 13 June 2019 21 July 2021 2 years, 38 days 105 47 28 30 44.76   [51]
50px-Russell_Martin_2019.jpg Russell Martin 23px-Flag_of_Scotland.svg.png Scotland 1 August 2021 21 June 2023 1 year, 324 days 99 36 26 37

36.36

With the notable caveat that Martin managed them during the period where their parachute payments were cut and then ended.

Cooper has had a mixed bag of a managerial career so far, comes across a bit dour to me. Obviously did well to get Forest up but they lacked any real style of play in the PL and he chopped and changed every week (albeit not helped by having a squad of 60).

One thing for sure, if they did sack RM after delivering pretty much 2pts/game then the next guy would need to make a hell of a start.

Personally think the last thing we need is more change (plus the costs that entails) and certainly no guarentee anyone else would come in and do better. Change again to a third manager and new style of play in November if we are in the playoff positions and on 1.7pts/game?!

Edited by Dusic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Dusic said:

With the notable caveat that Martin managed them during the period where their parachute payments were cut and then ended.

Cooper has had a mixed bag of a managerial career so far, comes across a bit dour to me. Obviously did well to get Forest up but they lacked any real style of play in the PL and he chopped and changed every week (albeit not helped by having a squad of 60).

One thing for sure, if they did sack RM after delivering pretty much 2pts/game then the next guy would need to make a hell of a start.

Personally think the last thing we need is more change (plus the costs that entails) and certainly no guarentee anyone else would come in and do better. Change again to a third manager and new style of play in November if we are in the playoff positions and on 1.7pts/game?!

Mixed bag?

Won the World Cup with England u17s, runners up in the euros 

never finished outside the play offs in 3 championship seasons. In one of these he took over a team bottom to finishing 6th and winning the play offs 

Then kept Forest up in his first season in the premier league. Sacked with them 17th which is exactly the same position they are now 

of that’s a mixed bag I’m not sure what sort of manager you expect us to get

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Mixed bag?

Won the World Cup with England u17s, runners up in the euros 

never finished outside the play offs in 3 championship seasons. In one of these he took over a team bottom to finishing 6th and winning the play offs 

Then kept Forest up in his first season in the premier league. Sacked with them 17th which is exactly the same position they are now 

of that’s a mixed bag I’m not sure what sort of manager you expect us to get

Definetly think they have gone backwards since appointing Nuno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Nearer 80 than 90.

Besides, money talks.

Yeah money might talk but so do other teams, with equal or more money. Presumably ones that haven’t been through 4 managers in 2 seasons too. 

Edited by Fabrice29
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said:

We’re not sacking Martin and if we did after he delivered a near 90 point season then you’ll do well to convince credible managers to trust you. 

Has it been a "near 90 point season"  because we've been exceptional or because the collective quality of the teams below us has been poorer than usual...? 

#itsallrelative

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint said:

I agree. I deliberately chose the word exciting rather than competent. To be fair to RM, he has got us playing some neat passing football, but a) he hasn't got a plan when teams come on to us and b) he isn't yet tactically astute enough to react to changes from the opposition. In some ways, despite the incompetence up front and lack of a goalkeeper who saves shots, it's our midfield that is getting exposed. One poster mentioned we lost the plot when Romeu went and nowadays when Downes isn't playing and that's what he needs to sort out.

Personally reckon Charles could develop in to a competent CDM but there's something RM doesn't like about him. Maybe it's just his inexperience.

He hasn't got a plan when teams come on to us because :

a) We don't give a shit about other teams, how they play, what tactics they use etc

and 

b) We only have a passing interest in what they do at set pieces

Because :

c) Our system is the best, trust the system, we will be brave, therefore we will win.

It's sad but true.  If we spent a little time on the tactics of other teams, maybe we wouldn't throw away so many winning positions.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

He hasn't got a plan when teams come on to us because :

a) We don't give a shit about other teams, how they play, what tactics they use etc

and 

b) We only have a passing interest in what they do at set pieces

Because :

c) Our system is the best, trust the system, we will be brave, therefore we will win.

It's sad but true.  If we spent a little time on the tactics of other teams, maybe we wouldn't throw away so many winning positions.

It’s like a weird religious cult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, trousers said:

Has it been a "near 90 point season"  because we've been exceptional or because the collective quality of the teams below us has been poorer than usual...? 

#itsallrelative

Average 90 points over past 10 or 20 years of Championship football should give you the answer to get you off the fence 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, notnowcato said:

Average 90 points over past 10 or 20 years of Championship football should give you the answer to get you off the fence 😉

Nah... prefer to stay open minded thanks.... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, trousers said:

Has it been a "near 90 point season"  because we've been exceptional or because the collective quality of the teams below us has been poorer than usual...? 

#itsallrelative

The second point plus the embarrassment of riches within the squad he was given to work with.

Edited by Toussaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, notnowcato said:

Average 90 points over past 10 or 20 years of Championship football should give you the answer to get you off the fence 😉

Not really, it seems clear to me the gap between the prem, and particularly the teams relegated, is widening at an exponential rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toussaint said:

Not really, it seems clear to me the gap between the Prem,  and particularly the teams relegated, is widening at an exponential rate.

well said Toussaint,

I've quoted several times in the past that the "gap" between the bottom of the Prem... and the top end of the Championship is far greater than

merely 3 league places.   Looking at last season when Burnley were runaway winners in the Championship whilst Luton and Sheff. United made

it more by luck than judgment, and this season's performances have been no real surprise to many of us.  

 

Saints' final relegation had been delayed  - only because there had been 3 sides - a little worse than we were - for several seasons past. 

Leeds and Leicester drew the short straws and  came down at the same time ..when on the balance  Forest and Everton were worse and can

count themselves very lucky to have survived by getting a few extra points in the last month. 

 

This season all three promoted sides were treading water from the first games, and they are in line for an abrupt return to the Championship,

and maybe Forest and Everton will survive for yet another year - subject to off-the-field punishments of a points deduction. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Fabrice29 said:

We’re not sacking Martin and if we did after he delivered a near 90 point season then you’ll do well to convince credible managers to trust you. 

Was Nathan Jones a credible manager? Managers will come here we are a good place to attract. Whether our owners can do that is another matter.

I agree we won’t sack him and after 15m spent on sacking him and Ralph we can’t but something has to change next season we simply cannot allow teams to walk through our midfield again.

Edited by Give it to Ron
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the gulf between the two getting greater? If it was you would expect the three promoted teams to come straight back down most of the time, but this rarely happens. You can still go up and stay up if you do it properly. All non big club clubs are one bad season away from going down and often the foundations for a bad season are laid in the season before. Which means there is a space in the Prem ready to be bagged by the most prepared promoted team.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...